On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 13:48:20 -0700, motty.cruz wrote:
> Where does Postfix reads default perimeters? Is there an actual file,
> or do I have a misconception of Postfix structure, I google it but
> come up empty.
See src/global/mail_params.h.
--
Sahil Tandon
On 7/10/10 6:49 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 09:48 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
>>
>> To call all mailing list managers "listservs" is as wrong as calling
>> all MTAs "Postfixes". :-)
>
> That would not be a bad idea.
Yes it would, we'd end up in a world where people genuinely thought that
On Oct 6, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 12:04 PM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please suggest me solution on following requirements :
>>
>> User will send emails on one postfix server then this server will route
>> email traffic to multiple postfix server
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:13 +1100, James Gray wrote:
> > We've used it for years, had very little complaints, maybe half a
> > dozen in all that time.
> > SPF is a "must use" IMHO, and by use of "-all" ... providing you
> > configure your DNS correctly.
> >
>
>
>
> ...and then a user puts
On 10/06/2010 10:48 PM, motty.cruz wrote:
Hello,
Where does Postfix reads default perimeters? Is there an actual file, or do
I have a misconception of Postfix structure, I google it but come up empty.
If you want to know what the defaults are for your installation, run
postconf -d > main
motty.cruz:
> Hello,
> Where does Postfix reads default perimeters? Is there an actual file, or do
> I have a misconception of Postfix structure, I google it but come up empty.
The defaults are are determined when Postfix is compiled.
Wietse
Victor wrote:
> It looks like the ps_early_dnsbl_event() callback is called here with
> a client context that has been deallocated (client disconnected, ...
> before all the DNS blacklist lookups completed). The callback should
> be cancelled when the client state is deleted.
>
> The "dnsbl_score_
Hello,
Where does Postfix reads default perimeters? Is there an actual file, or do
I have a misconception of Postfix structure, I google it but come up empty.
Thanks,
-motty
2010/10/6 Jeroen Geilman :
> On 10/04/2010 10:30 PM, K bharathan wrote:
>>
>> hi all
>> i'd like to put a smarthost using postfix; what are the min.precautions i
>> shud put in? i've heard controls on outgoing mails are not that easily
>> effective unlike the controls on incoming mails; also i plan
Carlos Mennens wrote:
> Guys I apologize if this doesn't belong here but I did a 'Google'
> search and I decided it would be best to ask the community who uses
> Postfix from an 'administrative' perspective. I am looking for a
> statistics utility for mail. I don't really have any specific
> requir
On 10/04/2010 10:30 PM, K bharathan wrote:
hi all
i'd like to put a smarthost using postfix; what are the
min.precautions i shud put in? i've heard controls on outgoing mails
are not that easily effective unlike the controls on incoming mails;
also i plan to use SA and Amavis; appreciate valua
On 10/04/2010 10:42 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 29/09/2010 02:33, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 09/28/2010 02:17 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 00:15 +0200, mouss wrote:
Le 27/09/2010 13:25, Julien Vehent a écrit :
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:06:46 +0200, David
Touzeau wrote:
I'm i
On 10/06/2010 09:48 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
If the lists are managed by a listserv software such as mailman ...
Please excuse the brief aside but as someone who has been involved
slightly with Mailman (as the author of some installation
instructions)
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
If the lists are managed by a listserv software such as mailman ...
Please excuse the brief aside but as someone who has been involved
slightly with Mailman (as the author of some installation instructions),
please do not use "listserv" as a generic
On 10/04/2010 10:55 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 04/10/2010 21:10, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 10/04/2010 08:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jeroen Geilman:
The real client IP ? That can't be trivially spoofed, and so would
actually BE your server.
I have seen clients who apparently connect to my M
On 10/05/2010 08:48 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hi,
I have a setup, where emails received by mail server(postfix) are taken on and
the resulting email's body(html or plain text) and attachments are parsed to
separate files and saved, for this I use javax mail api.
Suspect.
The problem oc
On 10/05/2010 12:04 PM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
Hi,
Please suggest me solution on following requirements :
User will send emails on one postfix server then this server will
route email traffic to multiple postfix servers.
For what purpose ?
Any useful advice hinges on why you want to d
* Vernon A. Fort :
> > Were you seeing the signal 11 errors before turning on verbose logging?
> >
> > Wietse
>
> yes, as noted with my previous post. just not as frequent, say one
> every 4-5 days.
I also have a few:
Sep 24 13:56:04 mail postfix/master[2823]: warning: process
/usr/libexe
On 10/05/2010 08:35 PM, Christopher Kurtis Koeber wrote:
Hello,
I have emailed about integrating my Postfix installation with Mailman
and discovered that I will need to redesign my Postfix configuration
to make it work. Therefore, I am asking for assistance in this task.
Here is what my mail
Vernon A. Fort:
> > > This is enough. You are running "postscreen -v", you probably should
> > > not be running it with verbose logging, but that of course is no reason
> > > why it should crash, so...
> > >
> > > It looks like the ps_early_dnsbl_event() callback is called here with
> > > a client
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:40 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:51:16PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> >
> > > Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
> > > Core was generated by `postscreen -l -n smtp -t inet -u -s 2 -v'.
> > > Program terminated with s
On 10/06/2010 07:16 PM, D G Teed wrote:
Usually I prefer to work within the package management provided
by a distro, or some repository collection. It can provide timely
security updates and you can have some confidence that all
of the updates coming at once are tested to work together.
I avoid
Carlos Mennens wrote:
Guys I apologize if this doesn't belong here but I did a 'Google'
search and I decided it would be best to ask the community who uses
Postfix from an 'administrative' perspective. I am looking for a
statistics utility for mail. I don't really have any specific
requirements b
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Mennens
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 15:32
> To: Postfix
> Subject: Mail Statistics (OFF TOPIC)
>
> Guys I apologize if this doesn't belong here but I did a 'G
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:40 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:51:16PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> I'll take it from here.
>
> Wietse
Also, I forgot to mention this server is sitting BEHIND a checkpoint
firewall. Not sure if that makes any diff
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:32 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Vernon A. Fort:
> > I recompiled postfix: unstripped and with -ggdb. I ran gdb postscreen
> > core file - new binary but old core file. May be still useful but will
> > have to wait on another segfault.
> >
> > attached is the backtrace
Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:51:16PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
> > Core was generated by `postscreen -l -n smtp -t inet -u -s 2 -v'.
> > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> > ...
> > #3 0x0805f827 in msg_info
Vernon A. Fort:
> I recompiled postfix: unstripped and with -ggdb. I ran gdb postscreen
> core file - new binary but old core file. May be still useful but will
> have to wait on another segfault.
>
> attached is the backtrace using new binary with old core file.
Assuming that the generated pr
Guys I apologize if this doesn't belong here but I did a 'Google'
search and I decided it would be best to ask the community who uses
Postfix from an 'administrative' perspective. I am looking for a
statistics utility for mail. I don't really have any specific
requirements but anything that can giv
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:24 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:51:16PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> This is enough. You are running "postscreen -v", you probably should
> not be running it with verbose logging, but that of course is no reason
> why it should crash, so.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:51:16PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
> Core was generated by `postscreen -l -n smtp -t inet -u -s 2 -v'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> ...
> #3 0x0805f827 in msg_info (fmt=0x80683bb "%s: notify %s:
On 06/10/10 18:16, D G Teed wrote:
Usually I prefer to work within the package management provided
by a distro, or some repository collection. It can provide timely
security updates and you can have some confidence that all
of the updates coming at once are tested to work together.
I avoided th
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 13:37 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:28:45PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> > > We don't yet need the whole core file, just run:
> > >
> > > gdb /usr/sbin/postscreen /path/to/core
> > > ... copious output ...
> > > gdb) bt
> > >
> > > The
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 13:37 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:28:45PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> > > We don't yet need the whole core file, just run:
> > >
> > > gdb /usr/sbin/postscreen /path/to/core
> > > ... copious output ...
> > > gdb) bt
> > >
> > > The
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:35:38PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> > This is my first time working with core and backtrace files - bear with
> > me.
> >
> > Vernon
>
> I'm thinking this is no good - do we need debugging symbols? this is
> from gdb /usr/lib/postfix/postscreen "corefile".
>
> Read
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:28:45PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> > We don't yet need the whole core file, just run:
> >
> > gdb /usr/sbin/postscreen /path/to/core
> > ... copious output ...
> > gdb) bt
> >
> > The "bt" command generates a back-trace (stack trace), that should show
>
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:28 -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 13:22 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:15:36PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:30 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:43:44PM -0
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 13:22 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:15:36PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:30 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:43:44PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've noticed this:
> > >
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:15:36PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:30 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:43:44PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> >
> > > I've noticed this:
> > >
> > > mail.log.1:Oct 3 03:32:43 ns postfix/master[3672]: warning:
>
Usually I prefer to work within the package management provided
by a distro, or some repository collection. It can provide timely
security updates and you can have some confidence that all
of the updates coming at once are tested to work together.
I avoided the default Postfix from Redhat years a
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:30 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:43:44PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> > I've noticed this:
> >
> > mail.log.1:Oct 3 03:32:43 ns postfix/master[3672]: warning:
> > process //usr/lib/postfix/postscreen pid 19122 killed by signal 11
> >
> >
Thanks for your help, we will check the solutions and let you know.
Have a great day.
Saludos.
Ing. Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez
Analista del sector Gobierno
E-mail: aare...@scitum.com.mx
Telefono: 91 50 74 00 ext. 7489
Movil: (044) 55 52 98 34 82
La inf
Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL:
> Hi List,
>
> For one of our companies, we want to use a dedicated ip address for all their
> outgoing mails.
> So mail from @companyx.com goes out via 1.1.1.1
>
> When looking for ways to do this I found the
> sender_dependent_default_transport_maps.
>
>
varad gupta:
> Hi All
>
>
> We have a requirement where we need to reject senders if they are not
> present in our ldap virtual domains.
>
> Scenario =>
>
> postfix 2.5 with openLDAP (with various virtual domains)
>
> Problem Description =>
>
> Unknown senders (mail ids that are not present i
Hi All
We have a requirement where we need to reject senders if they are not
present in our ldap virtual domains.
Scenario =>
postfix 2.5 with openLDAP (with various virtual domains)
Problem Description =>
Unknown senders (mail ids that are not present in LDAP) are able to send
mails to recip
Hi List,
For one of our companies, we want to use a dedicated ip address for all their
outgoing mails.
So mail from @companyx.com goes out via 1.1.1.1
When looking for ways to do this I found the
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps.
Would that be the right way to go?
Thanks for any advic
46 matches
Mail list logo
