Postfix snapshot 20100916 fixes one tiny buglet in postscreen, and
improves the logging for pregreeting spambots. If nothing else
comes up, this will be the last update in a while.
Wietse
Bugfix (introduced 20100914): the "postscreen_greet_wait"
delay speedup worked only for DNSB
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:53:03 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Le 14/09/2010 19:11, fakessh a écrit :
>> hi guru of postfix
>> hi mouss and wieste
>>
>> hi all the users of ths list
>>
>> my question is simply
>>
>> is there a way to force startssl on port 25
>> or it is not a good method
>
> the short answe
I think i got it !
I'm running Dovecot as imap server for my Squirrel mail connections.
My Dovecot version 1.2.6. I change one configuration in the dovecot
configuration file:
# Group to enable temporarily for privileged operations. Currently this is
# used only with INBOX when either its initial
Le 14/09/2010 12:13, Frank Doege a écrit :
Hi all,
id like to modify the message postfix sends to the server when it
rejects an email in one of the checks performed.
For example,
450 Helo command rejected: Host not found; http://readhereforemore.info
this message is obscure to me! what's
Le 14/09/2010 19:11, fakessh a écrit :
hi guru of postfix
hi mouss and wieste
hi all the users of ths list
my question is simply
is there a way to force startssl on port 25
or it is not a good method
the short answer is no. you use port 25 to get mail from "public"
senders. you can't force
> I have to check, if I did a mistake with the patch itself, causing the man
> page errors, or if the patch needs little tweaks :) But at least the
> functionality is working. I am so happy! :)
The patch has very little bugs. The following snippet from the patch _could_
look like this:
--- pro
--On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 7:06 PM +0200 Christian Rößner
wrote:
I have to check, if I did a mistake with the patch itself, causing the
man page errors, or if the patch needs little tweaks :) But at least the
functionality is working. I am so happy! :)
Glad to hear it! I only ever u
It works!
The ldap_table SASL patch works for me on postfix-2.8-20100913
Sep 15 18:57:58 db slapd[1355]: do_bind: dn () SASL mech EXTERNAL
Sep 15 18:57:58 db slapd[1355]: ==>slap_sasl2dn: converting SASL name
cn=mx0.roessner-net.de to a DN
Sep 15 18:57:58 db slapd[1355]: slap_parseURI: parsing
> I have the patch, it has not yet been fully reviewed/integrated. If
> anyone wants to test it "as is", it is attached.
Thanks. I took the patch and applied it. Is compiled without warnings. Just
little bugs in the man page, which I am going to fix tomorrow.
server_host = ldap://db.roessner-net
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:28:22PM +0200, eri...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have to know if it is possible to reformat postfix log in a better
> readable format (like mdaemon log).
Yes, by parsing Postfix messages in syslog output files via a Perl script
or similar, and generating output that meets you
Hi all,
i have to know if it is possible to reformat postfix log in a better
readable format (like mdaemon log).
thanks
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:34:51AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I wrote a patch to support SASL mechanisms when connecting to LDAP many
> years ago, and maintained for for a time. However, I left the job where I
> required it back in 2007, and didn't do much with it since that point in
Christian Rößner writes:
>>> What about SASL-AUTH (i.e. EXTERNAL) and or Kerberos support in
>>> ldap_table? I was looking for not binding with binddn/bindpw to my
>>> LDAP-server and using something like authz-regexp to map the user. But
>>> could not find the support in postfix :)
>>
>> You ma
--On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:19 PM +0200 Christian Rößner
wrote:
Hi gain,
little question:
What about SASL-AUTH (i.e. EXTERNAL) and or Kerberos support in
ldap_table? I was looking for not binding with binddn/bindpw to my
LDAP-server and using something like authz-regexp to map the u
>> What about SASL-AUTH (i.e. EXTERNAL) and or Kerberos support in
>> ldap_table? I was looking for not binding with binddn/bindpw to my
>> LDAP-server and using something like authz-regexp to map the user. But
>> could not find the support in postfix :)
>
> You may use the sasl auxprop ldapdb and
Christian Rößner writes:
> Hi gain,
>
> little question:
>
> What about SASL-AUTH (i.e. EXTERNAL) and or Kerberos support in
> ldap_table? I was looking for not binding with binddn/bindpw to my
> LDAP-server and using something like authz-regexp to map the user. But
> could not find the support i
Ok thank you very much! now it works!
Fabio Ferrari
> * Fabio Ferrari :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have some problems in implementing a pipe to an external command.
>>
>> As said in the documentation, I've added the line
>>
>> transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
>>
>> in the main.cf file, then I
* Brian Evans - Postfix List :
> On 9/15/2010 8:19 AM, Christian Rößner wrote:
> >Hi gain,
> >
> >little question:
> >
> >What about SASL-AUTH (i.e. EXTERNAL) and or Kerberos support in ldap_table?
> >I was looking for not binding with binddn/bindpw to my LDAP-server and using
> >something like
> Postfix uses Dovecot or Cyrus libraries for SASL implementations.
>
> It does not care how they are configured to look on their backend for
> requests.
But the backend is a part of the setup. Shouldn't it cover it?
My wishlist features for example would be:
/etc/postfix/some_ldap.cf:
...
lda
On 2010/09/15 03:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
The postscreen in snapshot 20100914 has a problem where it terminates
...
There is no loss of mail (or even delay of mail) but I'll try to fix it
today. Meanwhile, snapshot 20100913 is problem free.
Postfix snapshot 20100915
On 2010/09/15 03:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
. Meanwhile, snapshot 20100913 is problem free.
Postfix snapshot 20100915 fixes this trivial problem, and has been
uploaded to ftp.porcupipine.org.
Wietse
I gather that is supposed to read ftp.porcupine.org
;o)
Wietse Venema:
> The postscreen in snapshot 20100914 has a problem where it terminates
...
> There is no loss of mail (or even delay of mail) but I'll try to fix it
> today. Meanwhile, snapshot 20100913 is problem free.
Postfix snapshot 20100915 fixes this trivial problem, and has
On 9/15/2010 8:19 AM, Christian Rößner wrote:
Hi gain,
little question:
What about SASL-AUTH (i.e. EXTERNAL) and or Kerberos support in ldap_table? I
was looking for not binding with binddn/bindpw to my LDAP-server and using
something like authz-regexp to map the user. But could not find the
The postscreen in snapshot 20100914 has a problem where it terminates
after logging a warning:
Sep 15 00:58:38 spike postfix/postscreen[60527]: warning: ps_dnsbl_receive: unex
pected event: 1
Sep 15 00:58:38 spike postfix/master[13545]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postf
There is no loss of mail
Hi gain,
little question:
What about SASL-AUTH (i.e. EXTERNAL) and or Kerberos support in ldap_table? I
was looking for not binding with binddn/bindpw to my LDAP-server and using
something like authz-regexp to map the user. But could not find the support in
postfix :)
Best regards
Christian
* Fabio Ferrari :
> Hello,
>
> I have some problems in implementing a pipe to an external command.
>
> As said in the documentation, I've added the line
>
> transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
>
> in the main.cf file, then I edited the transport file and added the line
>
> listadipr..
Hello,
I have some problems in implementing a pipe to an external command.
As said in the documentation, I've added the line
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
in the main.cf file, then I edited the transport file and added the line
listadipr...@sms.unimo.it pipediprova:
then I exe
> For your setup I'd say:
>
> * make roessner-net.com a relay_domain
> * use transport_maps to transport it to localhost via LMTP
> * use relay_recipient_maps
Changes took effect. Thanks very, very much :)
Christian
---
Roessner-Network-Solutions
Bachelor of Science Informatik
Nahrungsberg 81,
Zitat von Andrea Urbani :
Hello to everyone,
I'm new at this list so I hope to write in the right way my question.
I have the following situation: I try to send a mail to
u...@domain.tld.
If I manually ask for the MX records of DOMAIN.TLD I get:
MX 20 MAILSERVER1
MX 30 MAILSERVER2
MX 40 MAILS
First of all, I learned the philosophy of not setting default parameters. So if
some values are missing, then they are defaults :)
> I'm seeing multiple problems
>
>> mydomain = roessner-net.de
>> relay_domains = $mydestination lists.roessner-net.de
>
> mydestination should not be in relay_doma
On 09/15/2010 09:36 AM, Christian Rößner wrote:
ad4f0.5040...@roessner-net.com is a message-ID, not an email address.
Here it is used as an email-address
That was the original recipient address that was shown in my daily logs. So I
tested the situation with the same destination
Hello to everyone,
I'm new at this list so I hope to write in the right way my question.
I have the following situation: I try to send a mail to
u...@domain.tld.
If I manually ask for the MX records of DOMAIN.TLD I get:
MX 20 MAILSERVER1
MX 30 MAILSERVER2
MX 40 MAILSERVER3
The MAILSERVER1 has
* Christian Rößner :
> The address is a non existent address. I
> used my web.de test-account to send a mail to this fake. Here is the result:
So the domain is roessner-net.com
> postconf -n
I'm seeing multiple problems
> mydomain = roessner-net.de
> relay_domains = $mydestination lists.roes
>> ad4f0.5040...@roessner-net.com is a message-ID, not an email address.
>
> Here it is used as an email-address
>
That was the original recipient address that was shown in my daily logs. So I
tested the situation with the same destination from web.de.
>> Then they send spam to that message-ID
On 09/15/2010 01:00 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/9/15 Jeroen Geilman:
On 09/14/2010 03:06 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
How to configure postfix only allow tlsv1 connections (no plaintext
allowed) from defined ip ranges? three hosts are needed to communicate
smarthost with tlsv1 only?
On 09/15/2010 06:33 AM, Frank Doege wrote:
On 09/15/2010 01:47 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/14/2010 12:13 PM, Frank Doege wrote:
Hi all,
id like to modify the message postfix sends to the server when it
rejects an email in one of the checks performed.
For example,
450 Helo command rejecte
* Stan Hoeppner :
> ad4f0.5040...@roessner-net.com is a message-ID, not an email address.
Here it is used as an email-address
> Then they send spam to that message-ID thinking it's an email address.
> The RHS is correct, so your Postfix server initially accepts it.
And that's the problem. Why?
* Jeroen Geilman :
> On 09/14/2010 04:42 PM, Christian Rößner wrote:
> >Sep 11 10:34:36 mx0 postfix/lmtp[29594]: 40FC3520A6:
> >to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24,
> >delay=0.39, delays=0.19/0.06/0.01/0.13, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host
> >127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]
>
> Who is that ?
Dovecot LMTPd
On 09/15/2010 02:05 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 9/14/2010 5:56 PM:
On 09/14/2010 04:42 PM, Christian Rößner wrote:
Sep 11 10:34:36 mx0 postfix/lmtp[29594]: 40FC3520A6:
to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24,
delay=0.39, delays=0.19/0.06/0.01/0.13, dsn=5.1.1, statu
39 matches
Mail list logo
