Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Here's what I currently have:
10125 inet n - - - - smtpd -v
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=
-o smtpd_helo_restrictions=
-o smtpd_sender_restrictions=
-o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,rejec
I'm not suer whether this is the correct place to report this - but if
not please advise:
In the document:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
In the section entitled:
Postfix SMTP/LMTP client policy - SASL mechanism /properties/
and the subsection:
Encrypted SMTP session
Thanks to everyone who has helped with this. There are several of you
nd your help is much appreciated.
My recent posting on the "trust" issue with the google certificates is
not sorted - but is a red herring as far as this issue is concerned.
I think I have it sorted - or at least working so f
mouss put forth on 9/10/2010 5:54 PM:
> for header_checks, the option is no_header_body_checks:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#receive_override_options
Got it, I think.
> for smtpd restrictions:
> -o smtpd_foo_restrictions=blahblah
>
> if you want per smtpd header checks,
No. I
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> donovan jeffrey j:
>>> greetings
>>>
>>> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
>>> read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permis
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>> greetings
>>
>> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
>> read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
>> harmful. How do i clear the warning ?
>>
>> I
donovan jeffrey j:
> greetings
>
> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
> read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
> harmful. How do i clear the warning ?
>
> I used macports
>
> Sep 10 22:00:22 mx1 postfix/master[191]:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:05 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> greetings
>
> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
> read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
> harmful. How do i clear the warning ?
>
> I used macports
>
> Sep
greetings
i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have read
in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not harmful.
How do i clear the warning ?
I used macports
Sep 10 22:00:22 mx1 postfix/master[191]: daemon started -- version 2.7.1,
con
At 03:16 PM 9/10/2010, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/10/2010 05:28 PM, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
Hi!
what I'd like to do is block all emails from individual contries
based on sender email address (.au, .jp, etc)
What makes you think those are dependable criteria for filtering ?
Depends on w
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-09-10 5:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Indexes can speed up IMAP performance a decent amount, but they don't
> > help POP performance at all.
>
>
> As far as I know, Courier's speed issues are mostly IMAP related, so if
> you're o
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick Edwards:
> > Another quick question before I depart for work, I understand also (from
> > that other lists thread) that postfix does not support maildir++ , with
> that
> > curiosity, I googled and found mention of it not being introduc
On 9/6/2010 7:49 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/6/2010 6:27 PM, Alex Brown wrote:
I'd like to know what configuration option within Postfix I
can use to block this spam.
The mail is addressed to users at a hosted domain on my server
and it's being relayed by a trusted spam filtering server.
That do
Le 10/09/2010 17:45, augustocasagra...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.2.9 . Recently , i ' ve started receiving some
strange messages in my /var/log/messages log.
postfix/local[26604]: DEF9B441D6: to=,
orig_to=, relay=local, delay=1, status=bounced
(cannot access
mailbox /var/m
Le 11/09/2010 00:41, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Is there a way to have locally submitted mail (my_networks) bypass
header_checks when using a single master.cf smtpd instance?
one smtpd => one cleanup => one header checks
Since implementing Sahil's fine checkdbl.pl tcp server in header_checks,
Le 10/09/2010 17:28, post...@corwyn.net a écrit :
Hi!
what I'd like to do is block all emails from individual contries based
on sender email address (.au, .jp, etc)
In reading the docs, it looks like I can block particular domains with
check_client_access and check_sender_access
When I r
Is there a way to have locally submitted mail (my_networks) bypass
header_checks when using a single master.cf smtpd instance?
Since implementing Sahil's fine checkdbl.pl tcp server in header_checks,
I've noticed a 1-3 second delay when submitting from my workstation MUA.
Prior to this submission
post...@corwyn.net put forth on 9/10/2010 10:28 AM:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> what I'd like to do is block all emails from individual contries based
> on sender email address (.au, .jp, etc)
>
> In reading the docs, it looks like I can block particular domains with
> check_client_access and check_sender_a
Bryan Irvine:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> Jasper Jongmans:
> >>> http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#active_congestion
> >>> Google Groups link produces "documented not available" error.
> >>
> >> I gu
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:25:22PM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Jasper Jongmans:
> >> http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#active_congestion
> >> Google Groups link produces "documented not available" error.
> >
> > I guess they chang
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Jasper Jongmans:
>>> http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#active_congestion
>>> Google Groups link produces "documented not available" error.
>>
>> I guess they changed the locatio
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jasper Jongmans:
>> http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#active_congestion
>> Google Groups link produces "documented not available" error.
>
> I guess they changed the location. Someone who remembers the thread
> subject may be able to
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:06:33PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> Sep 10 15:54:10 alfmta01 postfix/master[21189]: warning: process
>> /usr/libexec/postfix/tlsmgr pid 21195 exit status 1
>> Sep 10 15:54:10 alfmta01 postfix/master[21189]: warning:
>> /usr/libexec/postfix/tlsmgr: bad command start
Jasper Jongmans:
> http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#active_congestion
> Google Groups link produces "documented not available" error.
I guess they changed the location. Someone who remembers the thread
subject may be able to dig up its current location.
> http://www.postfix.org/XFORWARD_
On 09/10/2010 09:58 PM, Raymond Fagnon wrote:
I am having issues with my postfix install. When I telnet to port 25
and try to do any smtp commands the system doesn't respond. I see in
my logs /var/lib/postfix/smtpd_tls_session_cache.db: Permission
denied. I have chown of the /var/lib/postfix/ d
On 9/10/2010 3:58 PM, Raymond Fagnon wrote:
I am having issues with my postfix install. When I telnet to port 25
and try to do any smtp commands the system doesn't respond. I see in
my logs /var/lib/postfix/smtpd_tls_session_cache.db: Permission
denied. I have chown of the /var/lib/postfix/ di
I am having issues with my postfix install. When I telnet to port 25 and try
to do any smtp commands the system doesn't respond. I see in my logs
/var/lib/postfix/smtpd_tls_session_cache.db: Permission denied. I have chown
of the /var/lib/postfix/ directory to postfix user and group postfix. I also
http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#active_congestion
Google Groups link produces "documented not available" error.
http://www.postfix.org/XFORWARD_README.html
First block says "EMSTP command".
post...@corwyn.net wrote:
what I'd like to do is block all emails from individual contries based on
sender email address (.au, .jp, etc)
check_helo_access regexp:/etc/postfix/map_tld
check_reverse_client_hostname_access regexp:/etc/postfix/map_tld
check_sender_access regexp:/etc/postfix/map
On 09/10/2010 05:28 PM, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
Hi!
what I'd like to do is block all emails from individual contries based
on sender email address (.au, .jp, etc)
What makes you think those are dependable criteria for filtering ?
In reading the docs, it looks like I can block particula
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.2.9 . Recently , i ' ve started receiving some strange
messages in my /var/log/messages log.
postfix/local[26604]: DEF9B441D6: to=,
orig_to=, relay=local, delay=1, status=bounced
(cannot access
mailbox /var/mail/user for user user. cannot open file: Permission denie
Hi!
what I'd like to do is block all emails from individual contries
based on sender email address (.au, .jp, etc)
In reading the docs, it looks like I can block particular domains with
check_client_access and check_sender_access
When I read through the docs for those two fucntions, it loo
On 2010-09-10 5:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Indexes can speed up IMAP performance a decent amount, but they don't
> help POP performance at all.
Dovecots indexes speed up IMAP performance quite dramatically in most
cases, not just a 'decent amount', at least as compared to Courier -
well, lets
I've been using dbmail (http://dbmail.org) for some time now. It works
great and its MySQL based. Messages are stored in the MySQL database.
I've heard of installations with thousands of users and it has
commercial support if you need it. GUI administration is not very good,
but there are
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:27:12 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
>> wrote:
>> > Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
>> > version of everything.
>> >
>> >Wietse
>> >
>> > *** ./
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
> wrote:
> > Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
> > version of everything.
> >
> > Wietse
> >
> > *** ./dict_sqlite.c-Fri Jun 18 20:19:15 2010
> > --- ./dict_sqlite.c Th
On 9/9/10 1:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> pickup(8) and smtpd(8) produce Received: headers. They write the
> message to cleanup(8) which implements header checks.
On 9/9/10 1:52 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> This message is handed off a proxy filter, not cleanup, so the
> cleanup_service_name has n
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
> version of everything.
>
> Wietse
>
> *** ./dict_sqlite.c- Fri Jun 18 20:19:15 2010
> --- ./dict_sqlite.c Thu Sep 9 11:01:12 2010
> ***
> ***
Nick Edwards:
> Another quick question before I depart for work, I understand also (from
> that other lists thread) that postfix does not support maildir++ , with that
> curiosity, I googled and found mention of it not being introduced due to
> possible race conditions, but the latest mentions were
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Nick Edwards put forth on 9/10/2010 2:32 AM:
>
> > Before the fans cry foul of why not Dovecot. we have followed the list
> > thread of what may be a problem with Dovecot its author has identified
> but
> > decided is a "tuff luck" case, he i
* Richard Chapman :
> OK. I'm making some progress here:
>
> After attempting a sasl/tls connection to smtp.gmail.com I get the
> following in the logs:
>
> Sep 10 17:12:32 C5 postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
> Sep 10 17:12:32 C5 postfix/master[20209]: daemon started -- v
Nick Edwards put forth on 9/10/2010 2:32 AM:
> Before the fans cry foul of why not Dovecot. we have followed the list
> thread of what may be a problem with Dovecot its author has identified but
> decided is a "tuff luck" case, he indicates serious corruption risks with
> index and caches using mu
OK. I'm making some progress here:
After attempting a sasl/tls connection to smtp.gmail.com I get the
following in the logs:
Sep 10 17:12:32 C5 postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
Sep 10 17:12:32 C5 postfix/master[20209]: daemon started -- version 2.3.3,
configuration /e
Good day all,
I apologize in advance if the moderators consider this slightly OT.
We have many users moved to a MySQL database, planned for moving away from
Cyrus on Sunday Oct 3, we are almost ready to go but found a problem with
pop3 software we were going to use.
So basically, using postifx's
44 matches
Mail list logo
