Re: Selective outbound relaying II

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > TLS security levels are configurable per nexthop destination > as documented.  SASL logins are also specified via the table of > per-destination user:password pairs. It is not clear what's missing. I'll read more. The only thing that may b

Re: Selective outbound relaying II

On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:17:28PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Ville Walveranta put forth on 7/8/2010 9:14 PM: > > sender_dependent_relayhost_maps works except that the other settings > > affecting the relay aren't conditionalized by the defined relayhost > > maps. In this case the relayhost fo

Re: DNS load-balancing two equal nexthops is not fair

On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 01:37:08PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > On 07/06/2010 01:10 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: >> >> So you have multiple exit points with non-uniform latency, but the more >> severe congestion is downstream, so you want to load the exit points >> uniformly. Yes, the solution is

Re: Selective outbound relaying II

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Something tells me you'll answer your own question before we get a chance to. > ;) ;-) I think I've now hit a wall with a singular configuration. I'll proceed with setting up a second instance unless someone has a clever idea how to accompl

Re: Local delivery not working properly

Yes, i know i disable the local delivery agent, but i still wish to have root local delivery to be enable. I follow the document instruction never mention need to add virtual_mailbox_maps. I just try the virtual_mailbox_maps with r...@localhost, but i still get (local mail delivery is disabled), pl

Re: Selective outbound relaying II

Ville Walveranta put forth on 7/8/2010 9:14 PM: > sender_dependent_relayhost_maps works except that the other settings > affecting the relay aren't conditionalized by the defined relayhost > maps. In this case the relayhost for the externally relayed > "business" domains requires TLS and authentic

Re: Selective outbound relaying II

sender_dependent_relayhost_maps works except that the other settings affecting the relay aren't conditionalized by the defined relayhost maps. In this case the relayhost for the externally relayed "business" domains requires TLS and authentication while the relay for the local domain (being the lo

Re: Selective outbound relaying II

"sender_dependent_relayhost_maps" may be what I'm looking for..

Selective outbound relaying II

Hello everybody, I'm revisiting this issue after a break - about a year - and now I'm trying to get to the bottom of this. I found a thread from five years back (http://bit.ly/bIFigX) that discusses a similar issue, but my situation is somewhat different. I'm attempting to create a configuration

Re: Local delivery not working properly

On 07/08/2010 05:42 PM, Teh Kim Chooi wrote: Hi, i have disable local delivery follow the document instruction, then i enable 2 user in the virtual file but not able to send to these users. Jul 8 22:57:07 smtp2 postfix/error[9618]: 3E7C82BE8004: to=mailto:postmas...@xxx.xxx.com>>, orig_to=

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

On 07/08/2010 06:10 PM, Phil Howard wrote: On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt wrote: ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask slackware specific questions on a slackware mailinglist/usenet gr

Re: DNS load-balancing two equal nexthops is not fair

On 07/06/2010 01:10 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: So you have multiple exit points with non-uniform latency, but the more severe congestion is downstream, so you want to load the exit points uniformly. Yes, the solution is to disable the connection cache, and set reasonably low connection and helo

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

Phil Howard wrote: > I wanted to get input on it. I'm still on the fence about making that > change at work. The kind of input I was hoping was something that > indicated general ease of setup from an administrative perspective. > If the feedback with Ubuntu is that it works fine, then I'd consid

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 15:04, markus reichelt wrote: > * Phil Howard wrote: > > A single user scares you? Good heavens. > >> So what was my question specific to, if not Postfix?  It certainly >> was not specific to any distro.  Postfix was the common element. > > You are looking for the silver bu

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

* Phil Howard wrote: A single user scares you? Good heavens. > So what was my question specific to, if not Postfix? It certainly > was not specific to any distro. Postfix was the common element. You are looking for the silver bullet in times when there's only a golden child. (pardon my pun)

Re: Problem with tcp_table server

On 7/8/2010 12:13 PM, Philipp Leusmann wrote: Am 08.07.2010 um 19:02 schrieb Philipp Leusmann: Am 08.07.2010 um 18:23 schrieb Noel Jones: On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote: Hi all, to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota availability for incoming m

Re: Problem with tcp_table server

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 13:13, Philipp Leusmann wrote: > But I still get the odd > > warning: read TCP map reply from localhost:1337: unexpected EOF (Success) > > log entry. Is there missing anything? I gather from the documentation the connection is maintained for more requests. If your server

Re: Problem with tcp_table server

Am 08.07.2010 um 19:02 schrieb Philipp Leusmann: > > Am 08.07.2010 um 18:23 schrieb Noel Jones: > >> On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota >>> availability for incoming messages. >>> I read

Re: Problem with tcp_table server

Am 08.07.2010 um 18:23 schrieb Noel Jones: > On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota >> availability for incoming messages. >> I read over and over again, but >

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:15, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote: > (I've installed PF on half a dozen Ubuntu boxes, with no hiccups > significant enough to remember.) > > What I would say is that the differences between distros only involve > setup and maybe maintenance, and do not involve performance, so

Re: Problem with tcp_table server

On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote: Hi all, to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota availability for incoming messages. I read over and over again, but still I am getting messages like Jul 8 17:46:24 s15277780 p

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

Phil Howard wrote (on Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:10:39PM -0400): > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt wrote: > > > ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro > > shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask > > slackware specific questions on a sla

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt wrote: > ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro > shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask > slackware specific questions on a slackware mailinglist/usenet group, > and post postfix problems (which you

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 08:30, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > Okay, I may have been baiting a bit there. > The obvious inference is that you need to know your distro in order to be > able to do anything useful with it. > If that causes issues, that distribution's support is your first port of > call, NOT

Re: Multiple sites (and mail servers) for one domain

Hello, First of all, thanks mouss for the reply. I have made few steps forward in my hub and spoke setup. I set up the hub which is forwarding mail to the agencies' server based on a MySQL table. The problem is located on agencies' servers. As I first said, I have only 1 domain. When I want to

Problem with tcp_table server

Hi all, to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota availability for incoming messages. I read over and over again, but still I am getting messages like Jul 8 17:46:24 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[3325]: warning: read TCP map reply

Local delivery not working properly

Hi, i have disable local delivery follow the document instruction, then i enable 2 user in the virtual file but not able to send to these users. Jul 8 22:57:07 smtp2 postfix/error[9618]: 3E7C82BE8004: to=< postmas...@xxx.xxx.com>, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=0.01, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=5.0.0, stat

Re: SASL Authentication per recipient domain

On 7/8/2010 8:24 AM, David Jacobson wrote: Hi There, First post to postfix mailing list, be nice... ;) Postfix 2.6.6.2z We have a hosted mail platform with 100's of companies, some companies require our MTA to talk to a smarthost for their domain with authentication. As per SASL_README The a

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

* Jeroen Geilman wrote: > >Why did you bother responding if you have such a narrow view that you > >cannot see it? Do you actually like to show off how arrogant you can > >be? > There was, simply, no postfix-specific question in your post Agreed. > I could replace every mention of the word "p

Re: postconf and TLS on AIX

Dr. Venema, Looking more closely, I had not specified a value for smtpd_sasl_path. Doing so seems to have resolved the issue. For the record, the error had been: # postfix start /usr/libexec/postfix/post-install: Error: "no smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt" should be "no" or an absolute path

SASL Authentication per recipient domain

Hi There,First post to postfix mailing list, be nice... ;)Postfix 2.6.6.2zWe have a hosted mail platform with 100's of companies, some companies require our MTA to talk to a smarthost for their domain with authentication.As per SASL_READMEThe above can be achieved with something like this :/etc/pos

Re: distribution issues with Postfix

On 07/07/2010 08:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote: On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman wrote: I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure postfix properly. Name it. Okay, I may have been baiting a bit there. The obvious inference is that you need t

Re: status=bounced unknown user:

On 2010-07-07 11:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Jerry put forth on 7/7/2010 8:09 AM: > >> Why are you setting configuration parameters to their default setting? >> It doesn't serve any purpose that I am aware of. > I've seen this quite a bit. It leads me to believe there are some Linux > distros

Re: postconf and TLS on AIX

Zitat von Theodore Durst : Anyone out there been able to configure postfix with TLS certificate support on AIX? I am trying to get postfix running on a RS/6000 running AIX 5.3.0.0. Postfix is working, it sends mail, which is all we want this server to do (it will never need to receive). W

Re: postconf and TLS on AIX

Theodore Durst: > * enabling TLS results in postfix failing to load. By process of eliminati >-on, it is pretty clear that " smtpd_tls_security_level = may" is the culpri >-t. Any value aside from no causes a failure to start. What is hte complete error message? TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://ww