Hi community,
in the last time i have some problems with smtp-senders who are blocked by
dnsbl-lists like
uceprotect.net. The owner of the mailservers assured me not to generate and
send any SPAM.
How can i implement a whitelist for some friendly senderdomains to bypass the
reject_rbl_client r
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:19:03PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> I have a system with some user accounts and is the final destination
> for a few domains. Some of these users forward email off the system to
> another system, such as yahoo or gmail. The problem I'm having is when
> a user is forwarding thei
Hi,
I have a system with some user accounts and is the final destination
for a few domains. Some of these users forward email off the system to
another system, such as yahoo or gmail. The problem I'm having is when
a user is forwarding their email to an expired yahoo account, for
example, and how
On 25/03/2010, at 10:43 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> * all mail to be sent on to a relayhost regardless of whether
>> the local MTA thinks it should be delivered locally or not.
>> (this is the specfic issue I currently have)
>
> relayhost = $mydomain
This still doesn’t solve the issue of local
James Lever:
> * all mail to be sent on to a relayhost regardless of whether
> the local MTA thinks it should be delivered locally or not.
> (this is the specfic issue I currently have)
relayhost = $mydomain
> * all mail to be rewritten in the form $lo...@$mydomain (preferrably
> in that ge
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:09:44AM +0100, Gregory BELLIER wrote:
> if I copy an existing cipher in OpenSSL and rename it, it will act as if it
> is a new cipher.
On the wire SSL ciphers have numeric ids, not names. If you "rename"
a cipher, it just changes how it is displayed in logs. Renaming c
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 07:51:53AM +1000, James Lever wrote:
>
> On 25/03/2010, at 3:45 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> >>
> >> http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#myorigin
> >>
> >> See the *second* paragraph.
> >
> > Also: http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#
Hi Wietse,
On 25/03/2010, at 8:59 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> See http://www.postfix.org/ADRESS_REWRITING_README.html, option
> address masquerading.
So that is what I was trying to use. The problem with this is that to get it
to work the way I (think) I want it to work, I need to do the follow
First and foremost, please read the fine Postfix Debugging HOWTO [1]. It
will provide guidance in troubleshooting your problem.
On 2010-03-24 Josh Cason wrote:
> First I hope I'm posting a reply back. I'll try to explain better.
> Since I cannot find the log I need to post.
What operating system
It isn't just aol. It is any isp system that they seem to be spamming.
As I said a person connnects up. (not one of the email users). Just a
random ip number. Sometimes it is postini (we use postini), aol, etc,
etc. That sends one message in with mutiple reciepients. Then it sends
out like
James Lever:
> On 25/03/2010, at 3:45 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >>
> >> http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#myorigin
> >>
> >> See the *second* paragraph.
> >
> > Also: http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick
>
> Unfortunately, the problem with both of thes
Randy put forth on 3/24/2010 3:55 PM:
> dig -x 208.43.143.111
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 111.143.43.208.in-addr.arpa. 3600 INPTR
> 208.43.143.111-static.reverse.softlayer.com.
Your problem isn't the Exchange server per se. Your problem is that you're
forwarding spam to it, and its anti-spam
Josh Cason a écrit :
> I have two problems. I built a new postfix e-mail system that worked
> great for about 1 year. Then I started getting spam that comes into our
> system as one msg and is then routed out to mutiple e-mail addresses
> like aol.com.
so you forward mail to aol and the like? ple
Gregory BELLIER a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> if I copy an existing cipher in OpenSSL and rename it, it will act as if
> it is a new cipher.
>
> Would I need to build postfix against this new OpenSSL to be able to use
> the new cipher? I think it's not required but I have a doubt.
> How does the TLS negoci
Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>>> This is harder than it looks. do you really need to worry about all this
>>> stuff or are you inventing problems?
>
> Well, I don't think I'm inventing problems, maybe I could do it in a
> easier way, and that's why I sent this mail to this list. ;)
>
> I had a lot o
On 25/03/2010, at 3:45 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#myorigin
>>
>> See the *second* paragraph.
>
> Also: http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick
Unfortunately, the problem with both of these configurations is that I ca
Nikolai K. Bochev a écrit :
> And your point is ?
please do not top post.
my point is what I said: v2 has nothing to do with v1. it's the same
name but it's not the same program. if you have something to say about
this, feel free to express yourself... Until then,
- v1 is a single threaded C pr
duyz
仍然们
ent from my HTC
-Original Message噢
From: Wietse Venema 万维网
Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2010 6:29 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Relaying and backskatter problem
Sean Reifschneider:
> On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> > EX:
> > : Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
> >
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
> > If all you want is treat anything.example.com as example.com, use:
> >
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > mydestination = localhost example.com pcre:/etc/postfix/mydestination.pcre
> >
> > /etc/postfix/mydestination.pcre:
> > /\.example\.com$/ whatever
> >
> > Where "whatev
Maybe you should look into spam feedback loops, to get notified when
users at remote ISPs are flagging your mail as SPAM.
http://www.google.com/search?q=spam+feedback+loop
Wietse
On Mar 24, 2010, at 16:26, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniel L'Hommedieu:
>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Daniel L'Hommedieu:
Hi all.
I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list.
I'm really hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do
Wietse Venema wrote:
Sean Reifschneider:
On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
EX:
: Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
reply to RCPT TO command))
I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that'
First I hope I'm posting a reply back. I'll try to explain better.
Since I cannot find the log I need to post.
The spam comes from any place. Mostly just foreign IP numbers. Yea we
could block the ip numbers but they change. We also use postini and to
my surprise it even show up through the
Sean Reifschneider:
> On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> > EX:
> > : Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
> > reply to RCPT TO command))
>
> I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
> would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that's where it's destine
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Daniel L'Hommedieu:
> >> Hi all.
> >>
> >> I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list.
> >> I'm really hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do
> >> here. I've been looking into things for the
On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> EX:
> : Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
> reply to RCPT TO command))
I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that's where it's destined)
and see if that server will acc
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> Sent: 24 March 2010 20:02
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Forward local mailbox to relayhost
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:51:33PM +0200,
On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniel L'Hommedieu:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list.
>> I'm really hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do
>> here. I've been looking into things for the last couple days and
>> have not m
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:51:33PM +0200, Isak Badenhorst wrote:
> I have asked before with no sucess and want ask again because I have spent
> quite a few days now searching for the answer with no luck. Maybe I am just
> not reading well enough but I cannot find my answer.
>
> I have just moved
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:43:18AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> James Lever:
> > I_ve been banging my head away at this for a while today and all
> > I have is a headache.
> >
> > Is there a (preferably generic) way to redirect *all* delivery to
> > local accounts to $lo...@$mydomain instead of
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
> Hi all.
>
> I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list.
> I'm really hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do
> here. I've been looking into things for the last couple days and
> have not made any progress.
You forgot to follow the mailing list
A configuration was introduced ( from the holy powers ) which happens
to cause our server to backskatter and I am trying to fix the problem on
our end ASAP.
1. We relay to an offsite mail server for a few of our users (
contracted mail hosting )
2. This is M$exchange, and they have rules whi
Hi all.
I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list. I'm really
hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do here. I've been looking
into things for the last couple days and have not made any progress.
Thanks.
Daniel
---
Today I think I am trying to do something si
I have asked before with no sucess and want ask again because I have spent
quite a few days now searching for the answer with no luck. Maybe I am just
not reading well enough but I cannot find my answer.
I have just moved from sendmail and have this one problem. I have a local
server in the offi
Am 24.03.2010 14:31, schrieb Martijn de Munnik:
> Hi,
>
> Our smtp server has some issues when talking to some remote mx's. This
> results in a timeout and the message not being delivered (this was
> discussed on this mailinglist but there doesn't seem to be a real
> solution available now). When
Query your mysql tables for the domains that loop:
$ postmap -q 126.com mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-va.cf || echo not found
$ postmap -q 126.com mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-vd.cf || echo not found
In both cases the output should be the text "not found".
Wietse
On 2010-03-24 Josh Cason wrote:
> I have two problems. I built a new postfix e-mail system that worked
> great for about 1 year. Then I started getting spam that comes into
> our system as one msg and is then routed out to mutiple e-mail
> addresses like aol.com.
Check your logs to find out how th
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:45:55 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Our smtp server has some issues when talking to some remote mx's. This
>> results in a timeout and the message not being delivered (this was
>> discussed on this mailinglist but there doesn't seem to
I had the same error at one time make sure you have this below in your
main.conf
mydestination = localhost.$mydomain, localhost, mateford.com, 126.com,
163.com
Thanks,
- Motty
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 04:18:49PM +, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> [ Received: from stytwo.spampig.org.uk (stytwo.spampig.org.uk
> [212.69.52.158]) ]
>
> > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:05 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >
> > > Everything you need to know is the RELEASE_NOT
Martijn de Munnik:
> Hi,
>
> Our smtp server has some issues when talking to some remote mx's. This
> results in a timeout and the message not being delivered (this was
> discussed on this mailinglist but there doesn't seem to be a real
> solution available now). When we relay the message through
James Lever:
> I_ve been banging my head away at this for a while today and all
> I have is a headache.
>
> Is there a (preferably generic) way to redirect *all* delivery to
> local accounts to $lo...@$mydomain instead of delivering to
> /var/mail/ ?
>
> (I_m trying to setup a true NULL CLIENT co
Hi,
Our smtp server has some issues when talking to some remote mx's. This
results in a timeout and the message not being delivered (this was
discussed on this mailinglist but there doesn't seem to be a real
solution available now). When we relay the message through another
server the remote mx ha
I have two problems. I built a new postfix e-mail system that worked
great for about 1 year. Then I started getting spam that comes into
our system as one msg and is then routed out to mutiple e-mail
addresses like aol.com. I have since update my postfix config file to
block even more spam
Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-03-24 11:49:
On 2010-03-24 Patric Falinder wrote:
If I have a subdomain that I need to do this with, sub.domain.com,
should it he like this then?
/etc/postfix/recipient_bcc:
if /@sub\.domain\.com/
/^...@sub\.domain\.com$/ $...@new.domain.com
endif
You can probably o
On 2010-03-24 Patric Falinder wrote:
> If I have a subdomain that I need to do this with, sub.domain.com,
> should it he like this then?
>
> /etc/postfix/recipient_bcc:
> if /@sub\.domain\.com/
> /^...@sub\.domain\.com$/ $...@new.domain.com
> endif
You can probably omit the "if ... endif", the mat
> (copy of an answer from a few days ago)
>
> To deliver to two destinations, you need two recipients.
>
> You can use a regexp recipient_bcc_maps to add another
> recipient, then use smtp_generic_maps to rewrite it back to
> the original during delivery. Use a transport_maps entry to
> direct th
Hi.
if I copy an existing cipher in OpenSSL and rename it, it will act as if
it is a new cipher.
Would I need to build postfix against this new OpenSSL to be able to use
the new cipher? I think it's not required but I have a doubt.
How does the TLS negociation work ? I guess it is done by Pos
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 19:31 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>
> Anyway, the solution is simple
>
> u...@example.com = Rejected as spam
> user+extens...@example.com = possibly accepted.
>
Good point.
Bas.
49 matches
Mail list logo
