Nikolai K. Bochev a écrit : > And your point is ?
please do not top post. my point is what I said: v2 has nothing to do with v1. it's the same name but it's not the same program. if you have something to say about this, feel free to express yourself... Until then, - v1 is a single threaded C program. v2 is a complete rewrite in perl. it has absolutely nothing to do with v1 - v1 was used in a large ISP setup. I have no information about v2 being used anywhere ... using the same name for two different solutions is not honest. > > ----- "mouss" <mo...@ml.netoyen.net> wrote: > >> Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit : > > >> note that v2 has nothing to do with v1. It is unfortunate to see the >> >> same product name used for two different things. v1 was a single >> thread >> >> C program. v2 is a perl program (I like perl. this isn't the >> issue...). >
