Re: Removing Headers

2009/8/14 Eduardo Júnior : > > ok, but there is another way to do what I want. > The example above was a test. > Accepting some headers and denying the rest is an alternative: > > /^((Resent-)?From|To|Cc|Date|Reply-to|Reply-TO|Return-Path|Message-ID):/       >  OK > /./     IGNORE > > No!! cleanu

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

On 14-Aug-2009, at 18:21, Marcelo Terres wrote: I know that, and I'm looking for help there too. Please stop TOFU posting. -- Vernon: Now this is the thought that wakes me up in the middle of the night. That when I get older, thes

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

I know that, and I'm looking for help there too. Anyway, vda patch is applied in postfix and I thought this list covers postfix in all its aspects (even patches and add-ons). Regards, Marcelo H. Terres mhter...@gmail.com ICQ: 6649932 MSN: mhter...@hotmail

Forward or BCC only external messages trough MTA

Hi everyone: I'm using postfix as MTA in a lot of servers. I usually use aliases to forward messages from one account to another, or use BCC (sender_bcc_maps and recipient_bcc_maps) to copy messages to other accounts. A couple of customers asked me to configure the system to save only a copy of e

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

Marcelo Terres schrieb: > I know that, but I suppose that others here may use this patch, am I right ? > > Regards, > > Marcelo H. Terres > mhter...@gmail.com > > ICQ: 6649932 > MSN: mhter...@hotmail.com

Re: Removing Headers

Hi, On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote: > On Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 22:18 CEST, >     Eduardo Júnior wrote: > >> > smtpd (listener) is not smtp (client). >> >> Ops, my mistake. >> >>  -o smtpd_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks > > There is no such configuration param

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

I know that, but I suppose that others here may use this patch, am I right ? Regards, Marcelo H. Terres mhter...@gmail.com ICQ: 6649932 MSN: mhter...@hotmail.com Jabber: mhter...@jabber.org http://twitter.com/mhterres http://identi.ca/mhterres http://mhter

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Marcelo Terres wrote: > I'm running RHEL4. I'm using postfix 2.2.10 with VDA patch and everything > is fine, except the following. That is a rather old version of Postfix; consider upgrading. > With parameter: > > virtual_overquota_bounce = no The above parameter is not p

Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

Hi. I'm running RHEL4. I'm using postfix 2.2.10 with VDA patch and everything is fine, except the following. With parameter: virtual_overquota_bounce = no I send a message from marc...@dominio1.com.br to marc...@dominio2.com.br and found this in the logs of dominio2 (the server running postfix

Re: SSL_accept error

2009/8/14 Ebbe Hjorth : > No more hints? :-( Do you still have a problem? You said, "Ahh, now we are talkin", which sounds like you were successful. Patrick's docs (http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/postfix_tls_support.html) are great, but I think they're a little misleadi

Re: What does Postfix do with undeliverable messages that never make it to the destination MTA?

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > All messages stay in the queue until maximal_queue_lifetime is reached. > By default, this is 5 days. > This prevents transient errors, such as connection loss on either end, > from affecting mail delivery. > Do not set this to a

Re: postfix terminating on signal 15

Wietse Venema wrote: Postfix usually logs an error if it cannot proceed. What are the logfile symptoms (excluding those caused by your babysitter)? Around the time the problems start there are far less log entries of postfix. And it's always writing log entries since it's a busy server. That

Re: What does Postfix do with undeliverable messages that never make it to the destination MTA?

Clint Miller wrote: > I have emails that accumulate in the Postfix deferred queue with > messages like: > > * (connect to comcat.net [216.3.71.208]:25: No > route to host) > * (connect to schollnet.com [208.73.210.27]:25: > Connection refused) > * (Host or d

Fwd: What does Postfix do with undeliverable messages that never make it to the destination MTA?

Stu, Here is how I have handled the cleaning up of enqueued messages. (Comments to follow) #!/bin/sh if [ $# -lt 4 ] ; then     echo "Usage: $0 MAIL_FROM DayOfWeek Month Date" ; exit fi mail_from=$1 dow=$2 month=$3 date=$4 date_regex="$2[[:space:]]+$3[[:space:]]+$4" report_to=`whoami` awk=

Re: What does Postfix do with undeliverable messages that never make it to the destination MTA?

Hi Clint, Would you mind posting your script/strategy on cleaning these messages out? Not to help me answer your question, but because I would love to do what you have done yourself :-) Thanks, Stu Clint Miller wrote: > I have emails that accumulate in the Postfix deferred queue with messages >

What does Postfix do with undeliverable messages that never make it to the destination MTA?

I have emails that accumulate in the Postfix deferred queue with messages like: * (connect to comcat.net[216.3.71.208]:25: No route to host) * (connect to schollnet.com[208.73.210.27]:25: Connection refused) * (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=oasis.org.autype=MX: Host no

Re: IPv6 and smarter relaying

At Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:16:27 -0600, Dave Täht wrote: > > d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes: > > Half solved! > > > I have setup my laptop (as a test) to send out and respond to ipv6 mail, > > and not listen on the ipv4 ports at all. I tunnel my laptop out to > > have a static ipv6 address, an

RE: Altermime is removing attachments

It seems your google is broken then On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:30:41 -0500, "Jesus Alejandro Cuevas Villegas" wrote: > Thanks a lot Noel, This is a Legacy system and I'm trying to get the > control > of this, I remove this option and I don't see any problem, I'm going to > monitor the logs and let yo

Re: Cluster

heartbeat + drdbor heartbeat + gfs 2009/8/13 Magnus Bäck : > On Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 19:58 CEST, >     pch0317 wrote: > >> Is postfix capable to work in high-availability or load-balancing cluster? >> If yes, where I can read about this. Please, give me a hint. > > This answer has b

RE: Altermime is removing attachments

Thanks a lot Noel, This is a Legacy system and I'm trying to get the control of this, I remove this option and I don't see any problem, I'm going to monitor the logs and let you know if the issue disappear. I search in Google but I can't find the man (available options) for altermime Regards Jesu

Re: Improper command pipelining after QUIT

Stefan F?rster: > * Wietse Venema : > > Stefan F?rster: > > > Dear members of postfix-users, > > > > > > can anyone of you please explain to me what the following log entry > > > means: > > > > > > postfix/smtpd[8558]: improper command pipelining after QUIT from > > > unknown[64.8.20.35] > > >

Bcc problem

mail server is postfix with virtual users and postfix admin for domain example.com; server fetches mail from an ISP mail server; it works fine; but if anybody send a Bcc to someb...@example.com it is immediately sent to postmaster ; it does not deliver to someb...@example.com; this happens only fo

Re: Improper command pipelining after QUIT

* Wietse Venema : > Stefan Förster: > > Dear members of postfix-users, > > > > can anyone of you please explain to me what the following log entry > > means: > > > > postfix/smtpd[8558]: improper command pipelining after QUIT from > > unknown[64.8.20.35] > > This means that the client sent "QUI

Re: Improper command pipelining after QUIT

Stefan F?rster: > Dear members of postfix-users, > > can anyone of you please explain to me what the following log entry > means: > > postfix/smtpd[8558]: improper command pipelining after QUIT from > unknown[64.8.20.35] This means that the client sent "QUIT" followed by something else; a sign

Re: postscreen being exhausted?

Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Wietse Venema : > > > I removed the warning for services with "process limit = 1" in the > > 2.7-nonprod release series, when I added the postscreen daemon. > > I installed the non - non-prod-version and kept the master.cf entries :( Aha. I haven't yet ported the postscreen

Re: openldap-2.3.39 crash

Zitat von 承磊 : Hi list I have been using postfix since a few weeks. The setup is currently: Redhat As4.4 (Linux 2.6.9-42 SMP), Postfix 2.3.39, openldap-2.3.39, BerkeleyDB 4.5. 20 , courier-authlib-0.56. Now, the ldap service crashes frequently once the ldap connection raises about 300(the datab

openldap-2.3.39 crash

Hi list I have been using postfix since a few weeks. The setup is currently: Redhat As4.4 (Linux 2.6.9-42 SMP), Postfix 2.3.39, openldap-2.3.39, BerkeleyDB 4.5. 20 , courier-authlib-0.56. Now, the ldap service crashes frequently once the ldap connection raises about 300(the database engine is bdb)

Improper command pipelining after QUIT

Dear members of postfix-users, can anyone of you please explain to me what the following log entry means: postfix/smtpd[8558]: improper command pipelining after QUIT from unknown[64.8.20.35] I do know what command PIPELINING is, that it is offered in response to an EHLO and that Postfix 2.6 kee

Re: postscreen being exhausted?

* Wietse Venema : > I removed the warning for services with "process limit = 1" in the > 2.7-nonprod release series, when I added the postscreen daemon. I installed the non - non-prod-version and kept the master.cf entries :( -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Char

Re: Postfix refuses to relay mail from SASL clients

Never mind. I was just missing: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,reject

Postfix refuses to relay mail from SASL clients

Hello, A question concerning SASL in Postfix. SASL works fine when I test it locally on the Postfix server, but if I am trying to authenticate to the server remotely, I see the following log messages: smtp postfix/smtpd[14090]: >>> START Client host RESTRICTIONS <<< smtp postfix/smtpd[14090]: gen

postfix + smtpauth + multiple remote mail hosts setup

hi guys. need your help in setting up a postfix mailserver. Basically I have a several mail servers which running different platform/software and hosting quite a number of domains. Now, all I want to setup is ... a single smtp-auth server using postfix which serves as an outgoing smtp server for

Re: SSL_accept error

2009/8/12 Ebbe Hjorth > > > 2009/8/12 Zaeem Arshad > > >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> 2009/8/11 Brian Evans - Postfix List >>> Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > 2009/8/10 Brian Evans - Postfix List >>> > > > >