I know that, and I'm looking for help there too. Anyway, vda patch is applied in postfix and I thought this list covers postfix in all its aspects (even patches and add-ons).
Regards, Marcelo H. Terres [email protected] **************************************** ICQ: 6649932 MSN: [email protected] Jabber: [email protected] http://twitter.com/mhterres http://identi.ca/mhterres http://mhterres.jaiku.com/ **************************************** http://mundoopensource.blogspot.com/ http://offtopicsandfun.blogspot.com/ http://www.propus.com.br On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Robert Schetterer <[email protected]>wrote: > Marcelo Terres schrieb: > > I know that, but I suppose that others here may use this patch, am I > right ? > > > > Regards, > > > > Marcelo H. Terres > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > **************************************** > > ICQ: 6649932 > > MSN: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > Jabber: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://twitter.com/mhterres > > http://identi.ca/mhterres > > http://mhterres.jaiku.com/ > > **************************************** > > http://mundoopensource.blogspot.com/ > > http://offtopicsandfun.blogspot.com/ > > http://www.propus.com.br > > Sent from Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Sahil Tandon <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Marcelo Terres wrote: > > > > > I'm running RHEL4. I'm using postfix 2.2.10 with VDA patch and > > everything > > > is fine, except the following. > > > > That is a rather old version of Postfix; consider upgrading. > > > > > With parameter: > > > > > > virtual_overquota_bounce = no > > > > The above parameter is not part of Postfix and hence unsupported > here. > > > > > Any ideas ? > > > > -- > > Sahil Tandon <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > vda has its own maillist > > -- > Best Regards > > MfG Robert Schetterer > > Germany/Munich/Bavaria >
