Hi,
I read and re-read the address-rewriting readme and coul dnot find any
indication on the way to rewrite addresses to include GECOS
information:
o...@cs.ait.ac.th => Olivier Nicole
Is that possible in Postfix? I beleive yes.
Where is that done and how?
Best regards,
Olivier
> I have gone through the postfix configs and amavis configs and could not f=
> ind any reference to spamc.. so where could this be coming from?
It should not be in amavisd-new: in normal configuration,
amavisd-new loads SpamAssassin as a Perl module and does not use
spamc/spamd mechanism.
You
>solution proposed by mouss:
>remove: this line:xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"from maildroprc
I removed xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"from maildroprcrestarted all services
but am still getting the following in my logs...
Jul 17 06:18:42 mail spamc[32239]: connect(AF_INET)
On Mon, July 27, 2009 18:21, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 18:05 CEST,
> Pablo Yaggi wrote:
>
>> On Monday 27 July 2009 12:46:04 pm Magnus Bäck wrote:
>> > On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 16:37 CEST,
>> > Pablo Yaggi wrote:
>> >
>> > > taking a deep look into your
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jake Vickers:
Now I know I posted the other day about disabling SSLv2, but if I add
That solution was for MANDATORY TLS encryption. If TLS is not mandatory,
then disabling SSLv2 is pointless: you allow plaintex
On Monday 27 July 2009 20:54:25 Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On Mon, July 27, 2009 23:06, Halassy Zoltán wrote:
> >> domain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
> >> otherdomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
> >> somedomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
> >>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Mon, July 27, 2009 23:06, Halassy Zoltán wrote:
>
>> domain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
>> otherdomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
>> somedomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
>> mail.example.com. CNAME real.example.com.
>
> imho mx reco
Hi Mouss,
The informaiton about Postfix environment follows :-
Postfix 2.5.1 (Ubuntu package)
Ubuntu 8.04.2 LTS
The content of main.cf using 'postconf -n' follows :-
=== begin of postconf -n ===
alias_database =
alias_maps =
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
On Mon, July 27, 2009 23:06, Halassy Zoltán wrote:
> domain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
> otherdomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
> somedomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com.
> mail.example.com. CNAME real.example.com.
imho mx records must not be a cname
--
xpoint
On Tue, July 28, 2009 01:07, ghe wrote:
> My MTA is on the DMZ with an FQDN and IP on a 1918 network. That IP gets
> NAT'ed on its way out to one that resolves to a218.slsware.com. So I set
> the helo name to what is seen by the universe.
>
> Is that a good enough reason?
yes if you make sure th
On Monday 27 July 2009 18:07:51 ghe wrote:
> On 7/27/09 1:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > [1] Strictly speaking, it's $smtp_helo_name which should resolve, but
> > the default value for smtp_helo_name is $myhostname, and I would
> > not generally recommend setting smtp_helo_name without good
Hello,
To test Spam Assassin you can compose an email and within the body include:
XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UBE-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
This will trigger spam assassin
2009/7/28 Joe :
> Carl A jeptha wrote:
>> When setting up Postfix with Amavis, ClamAV and spamassassin, should
On 7/27/2009 7:38 PM, Carl A jeptha wrote:
When setting up Postfix with Amavis, ClamAV and spamassassin, should one
see spamassassin working (I am using a Ubuntu server)
Yes, you should. One config item I'm still troubled by is:
@local_domains_maps If the domain you're receiving mail at isn't
Agree with the other, probably better for amavis-users list; however,
the answer is typically No. Amavis calls SA as a perl module. When
SA is processing you'll see amavisd processes in your ps list only,
not SA.
- N
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Carl A jeptha wrote:
> When setting up Postfi
Carl A jeptha wrote:
> When setting up Postfix with Amavis, ClamAV and spamassassin, should
> one see spamassassin working (I am using a Ubuntu server)
This might be better asked on an amavisd forum -
But having said that, the spamassassin classes are actually called
directly by amavis, so you wo
Carl A jeptha wrote:
> When setting up Postfix with Amavis, ClamAV and spamassassin, should one
> see spamassassin working (I am using a Ubuntu server)
>
True?
~Seth
When setting up Postfix with Amavis, ClamAV and spamassassin, should one
see spamassassin working (I am using a Ubuntu server)
--
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
On 7/27/09 1:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
[1] Strictly speaking, it's $smtp_helo_name which should resolve, but
the default value for smtp_helo_name is $myhostname, and I would
not generally recommend setting smtp_helo_name without good reason.
My MTA is on the DMZ with an FQDN and IP on
Joris Dobbelsteen:
> My idea to use
> ---
> inet_protocols=ipv6
> smtp_fallback_relay=smtp:[smtp.online.nl]
> ---
Drop the inet_protocols=ipv6. The SMTP client will
succeed over IPv6, when IPv4 is blocked. If the client
can't reach via either IPv6 or IPv4, use the ISP relayhost.
Wietse
My idea to use
---
inet_protocols=ipv6
smtp_fallback_relay=smtp:[smtp.online.nl]
---
fails, since you can only specify a host, but not a transport. So
disabling IPv6 effectively disables also the ability to reach
smtp.online.nl. The alternative it to have the firewall quickly end any
IPv4 SMTP
Charles Sprickman a écrit :
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Simon Waters wrote:
>
>> On Monday 27 July 2009 11:13:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
>>> Losing catchall seems to be the best solution but some of my customers
>>> want to create an emailaddress for every website the register on.
>>>
>>> m...@desjors
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
> Unfortunately, I have found that many Web programmers don't bother to
> read RFC's and find out what characters are allowed in email addresses.
> Many sites will not accept a "+" in your username. I think the old
> default qmail delimiter, "-", is a better choice for those jus
Cameron Camp a écrit :
> If I have a box with a valid reverse DNS entry of mail.example.com that
> has virtual domains of
>
> domain.com
> otherdomain.com
> somedomain.com
>
> will my "wrong" reverse DNS for the virtual domains affect delivery? Do
> I need to do anything?
>
many people confuse
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
> On Monday 27 July 2009 14:14:54 Cameron Camp wrote:
>> If I have a box with a valid reverse DNS entry of mail.example.com that
>> has virtual domains of
>>
>> domain.com
>> otherdomain.com
>> somedomain.com
>>
>> will my "wrong" reverse DNS for the virtual domains affect deliv
John/SML a écrit :
>
> [snip]
>
> however, there is an error about cleanup server in the verbose log when
> using LDAP :-
mouss said:
>> next time, do not show VERBOSE logs unless asked. ...
>
> [verbose log ignored]
>
> I googled the problem, but find no clue. Any idea?
>
Please be coll
I don't think that's a terribly good idea, but anyway:
main.cf:
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access pcre:/path/to/file
/path/to/file:
/(ppp|dialup|adsl)/ REJECT
You can move the check_client_access restriction to any other
smtpd_xxx_restrictions if you want. You probably
If I have a box with a valid reverse DNS entry of mail.example.com that
has virtual domains of
domain.com
otherdomain.com
somedomain.com
will my "wrong" reverse DNS for the virtual domains affect delivery? Do
I need to do anything?
You can simply do the following:
domain.com. MX 10 mail.examp
Cameron Camp schrieb:
> If I have a box with a valid reverse DNS entry of mail.example.com that
> has virtual domains of
>
> domain.com
> otherdomain.com
> somedomain.com
>
> will my "wrong" reverse DNS for the virtual domains affect delivery? Do
> I need to do anything?
>
> thx,
> Cameron
>
On Mon, July 27, 2009 21:14, Cameron Camp wrote:
> If I have a box with a valid reverse DNS entry of mail.example.com that
> has virtual domains of
>
> domain.com
> otherdomain.com
> somedomain.com
>
> will my "wrong" reverse DNS for the virtual domains affect delivery? Do
> I need to do anything?
On Monday 27 July 2009 14:14:54 Cameron Camp wrote:
> If I have a box with a valid reverse DNS entry of mail.example.com that
> has virtual domains of
>
> domain.com
> otherdomain.com
> somedomain.com
>
> will my "wrong" reverse DNS for the virtual domains affect delivery?
We cannot guess what mil
On Monday 27 July 2009 13:52:07 Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Simon Waters wrote:
> > On Monday 27 July 2009 11:13:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> >> Losing catchall seems to be the best solution but some of my customers
> >> want to create an emailaddress for every website the regi
If I have a box with a valid reverse DNS entry of mail.example.com that
has virtual domains of
domain.com
otherdomain.com
somedomain.com
will my "wrong" reverse DNS for the virtual domains affect delivery? Do
I need to do anything?
thx,
Cameron
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Simon Waters wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 11:13:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Losing catchall seems to be the best solution but some of my customers
want to create an emailaddress for every website the register on.
m...@desjors.nl
pay...@desjors.nl
deb...@desjors.nl
They
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jake Vickers:
> > Now I know I posted the other day about disabling SSLv2, but if I add
> That solution was for MANDATORY TLS encryption. If TLS is not mandatory,
> then disabling SSLv2 is pointless: you allow plaintext email.
I don
On Jul 27, 2009, at 7:18 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 05:47:29 Simon Waters wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 11:13:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Losing catchall seems to be the best solution but some of my
customers
want to create an emailaddress for every website the register on.
On Monday 27 July 2009 01:21:43 pm Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 18:05 CEST,
> Pablo Yaggi wrote:
>
> > On Monday 27 July 2009 12:46:04 pm Magnus Bäck wrote:
> > > On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 16:37 CEST,
> > > Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> > >
> > > > taking a deep loo
On Monday 27 July 2009 05:47:29 Simon Waters wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009 11:13:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> > Losing catchall seems to be the best solution but some of my customers
> > want to create an emailaddress for every website the register on.
> >
> > m...@desjors.nl
> > pay...@desjors.
On Monday 27 July 2009 05:38:17 Wietse Venema wrote:
> John/SML:
> > < Jul 24 14:16:22 imapsv02 postfix/master[17734]: warning: process
> > /usr/lib/postfix/cleanup pid 17969 exit status 2
>
> ...
>
> > I googled the problem, but find no clue. Any idea?
>
> This is the official reference:
>
> http:
On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 18:05 CEST,
Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009 12:46:04 pm Magnus Bäck wrote:
> > On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 16:37 CEST,
> > Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> >
> > > taking a deep look into your example, I notice
> > > the restriction is only applied to
I can see why he would want to do that - 99% of the spam I get is from
US-based cable modem- and DSL-hosted systems. My host - earthlink -
recently reconfigured their routers to disallow outbound email that
doesn't go through their servers, and I wish all ISPs would do that.
Perhaps . .
On Monday 27 July 2009 12:46:04 pm Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 16:37 CEST,
> Pablo Yaggi wrote:
>
> > taking a deep look into your example, I notice
> > the restriction is only applied to example.com, isn't it ?
>
> Yes.
>
> > if this is the case, I have a proble
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
>
> Losing catchall seems to be the best solution but some of my customers
> want to create an emailaddress for every website the register on.
>
> m...@desjors.nl
> pay...@desjors.nl
> deb...@desjors.nl
>
> etc.
>
> Then they use their mail client to filter the messages a
On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 16:37 CEST,
Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> taking a deep look into your example, I notice
> the restriction is only applied to example.com, isn't it ?
Yes.
> if this is the case, I have a problem on doing it, my list of domains
> is virtual, so I need to restrict th
On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 16:27 CEST,
Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> Well Magnus, I did what you told me, and postfix stoped receiving
> mails, when an external smtp tries to send mail to my local users,
> postfix respond access denied.
> I didn't do it exaclty like in you example,
Like most progra
Mangus,
taking a deep look into your example, I notice
the restriction is only applied to example.com, isn't it ?
if this is the case, I have a problem on doing it, my list
of domains is virtual, so I need to restrict the test to
them, is it possible ?
On Monday 27 July 2009 11:27:51 am
Well Magnus, I did what you told me, and
postfix stoped receiving mails, when an external smtp
tries to send mail to my local users, postfix respond
access denied.
I didn't do it exaclty like in you example, but I was
doing int the smtpd_recipent_restrictions,
this is what I did:
smtpd_sender_res
2009/7/27 Magnus Bäck :
> On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 11:55 CEST,
> Alejandro Vargas wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much. For the record, the solution was this:
>> 1) in /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>>
>> ensure alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
>> ensure mydestination = localhost
>> transport_maps
On Jul 27, 2009, at 5:08, Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 10:56 CEST,
Zbyszek wrote:
I googled everywhere, read how-tos but can not find solution for
simple problem in postfix:
I would like to have such config:
- smtp25/tcp; only server-server communication,
Jake Vickers:
> Now I know I posted the other day about disabling SSLv2, but if I add
That solution was for MANDATORY TLS encryption. If TLS is not mandatory,
then disabling SSLv2 is pointless: you allow plaintext email.
But if it gives someone warm fuzzies, you can use smtpd_tls_protocols
inste
I'm pulling my hair out with this one. I need to make the server PCI
compliant and we are still failing the test because we accept SSLv2
connections. I'm running Postfix 2.5.1 on a Fedora machine, and here is
my postconf:
$ postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/
On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 11:55 CEST,
Alejandro Vargas wrote:
> Thank you very much. For the record, the solution was this:
> 1) in /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>
> ensure alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
> ensure mydestination = localhost
> transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
>
On Monday 27 July 2009 11:13:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> Losing catchall seems to be the best solution but some of my customers
> want to create an emailaddress for every website the register on.
>
> m...@desjors.nl
> pay...@desjors.nl
> deb...@desjors.nl
They could use the "recipient_delimiter"
John/SML:
> < Jul 24 14:16:22 imapsv02 postfix/master[17734]: warning: process
> /usr/lib/postfix/cleanup pid 17969 exit status 2
...
> I googled the problem, but find no clue. Any idea?
This is the official reference:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
And please turn off that ve
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 10:55 +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> On Monday 27 July 2009 10:40:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> >
> > I'm using a couple of anti-spam techniques which successfully reject
> > (5xx) or ban (ipfilter firewall rule) most spam before even getting in
> > the queue.
>
> You use a L
On 7/27/2009, Martijn de Munnik (mart...@youngguns.nl) wrote:
> Are there ways to block these spam attacks?
Don't use catchalls for live/normal domains...
--
Best regards,
Charles
2009/7/27 Magnus Bäck :
>> I am using postfix+mysql virtual domains/users+dovecot+sieve. I am
>> using virtual domains, users, and aliases in mysql. How can I create
>> a pipe to a program like "test: |/usr/local/bin/test". If I insert
>> an a record in aliases tables, postfix tries to deliver the
On Monday 27 July 2009 10:40:34 Martijn de Munnik wrote:
>
> I'm using a couple of anti-spam techniques which successfully reject
> (5xx) or ban (ipfilter firewall rule) most spam before even getting in
> the queue.
You use a LOT of blacklists, which probably results in more false positives
than
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 11:40 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a couple of anti-spam techniques which successfully reject
> (5xx) or ban (ipfilter firewall rule) most spam before even getting in
> the queue. A couple of days ago about 2600 spam messages where delivered
> to an us
Hi,
I'm using a couple of anti-spam techniques which successfully reject
(5xx) or ban (ipfilter firewall rule) most spam before even getting in
the queue. A couple of days ago about 2600 spam messages where delivered
to an user with a catch-all account. These messages where classified as
SPAM or S
On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 11:00 CEST,
Alejandro Vargas wrote:
> I am using postfix+mysql virtual domains/users+dovecot+sieve. I am
> using virtual domains, users, and aliases in mysql. How can I create
> a pipe to a program like "test: |/usr/local/bin/test". If I insert
> an a record in al
On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 10:56 CEST,
Zbyszek wrote:
> I googled everywhere, read how-tos but can not find solution for
> simple problem in postfix:
> I would like to have such config:
> - smtp25/tcp; only server-server communication, only
> mail receive for local domain, n
I am using postfix+mysql virtual domains/users+dovecot+sieve. I am
using virtual domains, users, and aliases in mysql. How can I create a
pipe to a program like "test: |/usr/local/bin/test". If I insert an a
record in aliases tables, postfix tries to deliver the mail to
"|/usr/local/bin/t...@mydoma
Hello,
I googled everywhere, read how-tos but can not find solution for simple
problem in postfix:
I would like to have such config:
- smtp25/tcp; only server-server communication, only
mail receive for local domain, no relay, no send, encryption optional,
SPF, blocking 'serve
63 matches
Mail list logo
