Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Noel Jones:
Don't bash OP too hard. He got bit by the interaction of the
default value of virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps
and a static map in virtual_alias_maps. That made every
domain match the virtual_alias_domains lookup.
Just a funny int
William Michael wrote:
Long story - but to jump to end I changed platforms (Debian etch which
I am no comfortable with yet - from SuSE 6.2 system that serverely ate
itself with a heat spell)
I followed an ISP online how-to guide to set up the "perfect" debian ISP
server (I am NOT an ISP - b
Wietse Venema:
> Noel Jones:
> > Don't bash OP too hard. He got bit by the interaction of the
> > default value of virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps
> > and a static map in virtual_alias_maps. That made every
> > domain match the virtual_alias_domains lookup.
> >
> > Just a funny in
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, William Michael wrote:
>
> > Long story - but to jump to end I changed platforms (Debian etch
> which
> > I am no comfortable with yet - from SuSE 6.2 system that serverely ate
> > itself with a heat spell)
> >
> > I
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, William Michael wrote:
> Long story - but to jump to end I changed platforms (Debian etch which
> I am no comfortable with yet - from SuSE 6.2 system that serverely ate
> itself with a heat spell)
>
> I followed an ISP online how-to guide to set up the "perfect" debian I
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
> > i agree. But now i have to do it with postsuper -d QUEUE_ID
> >
> > in this situation how can i notify the user? i believe there will be somehow
> > a way to inform the user!!!
>
> There is no automatic notification for postsuper -d. If you want to no
Long story - but to jump to end I changed platforms (Debian etch which
I am no comfortable with yet - from SuSE 6.2 system that serverely ate
itself with a heat spell)
I followed an ISP online how-to guide to set up the "perfect" debian ISP
server (I am NOT an ISP - but I do let family and fr
On Wed June 10 2009 18:28:44 Noel Jones wrote:
> Don't bash OP too hard. He got bit by the interaction of the
> default value of virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps
> and a static map in virtual_alias_maps. That made every
> domain match the virtual_alias_domains lookup.
>
> Just a funny
Noel Jones:
> Don't bash OP too hard. He got bit by the interaction of the
> default value of virtual_alias_domains = $virtual_alias_maps
> and a static map in virtual_alias_maps. That made every
> domain match the virtual_alias_domains lookup.
>
> Just a funny interaction with a seldom-used
>
> Yes, but it does not help when you add a virtual alias DOMAIN,
> when I ask you to add only a virtual alias MAP.
>
> Wietse
Wietse, sorry my last reply went straight to you. Forgot to change the
addresses. Wanted to post here in case anyone else has this issue
though it's a strange
/dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed June 10 2009 17:50:34 Michael Glenney wrote:
After this message I was starting to think you were just some guy
who's screwing with me. Then I took a second and googled your name
:) I guess I'm not coming across as genuine if you feel I'm
deceiving you in some way. I'll
Michael Glenney:
> Can Postfix do this?:
Yes, but it does not help when you add a virtual alias DOMAIN,
when I ask you to add only a virtual alias MAP.
Wietse
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:09 PM
> To: Michael Glenney; postfix users list
> Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or "super" catch-all
>
> Michael Glenney wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> F
Michael Glenney wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:20 PM
To: Michael Glenney
Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or "super" catch-all
Michael Glenney:
I set it up as a map as y
On Wed June 10 2009 17:50:34 Michael Glenney wrote:
> After this message I was starting to think you were just some guy
> who's screwing with me. Then I took a second and googled your name
> :) I guess I'm not coming across as genuine if you feel I'm
> deceiving you in some way. I'll give this o
mouss wrote:
Harakiri a écrit :
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
From: Ralf Hildebrandt
Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM
* Harakiri :
Is it possible to specify the blackhole servers in a
se
> This would be a good time to confess you are using "my" virtual
> alias and sending mail to another virtual alias.
>
> Don't do that. Your catch-all destination needs to be a non-virtual
> address.
>
> Wietse
After this message I was starting to think you were just some guy who's
screw
Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
> * Gábor Lénárt :
>
>>> This is a backscatter source and will get you blacklisted in no time.
>> Hmm, what would be if someone use a policy server, rejecting the mail with
>> the link for the captcha URL in it.
>
> That sound interesting. It could work! It definitely s
Truth Seeker a écrit :
>
> Dear Pros'
>
> I am facing a problem in getting system generated mails to my local mailbox.
> let me explain the scenario.
>
> Postfix Mail Server <---> Firewall <---> External Mail Hosting
> example.comexternal.com
>
> To our inte
Harakiri a écrit :
>
>
> --- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>> From: Ralf Hildebrandt
>> Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM
>> * Harakiri :
>>> Is it possible to specify the blackhole server
This would be a good time to confess you are using "my" virtual
alias and sending mail to another virtual alias.
Don't do that. Your catch-all destination needs to be a non-virtual
address.
Wietse
> -Original Message-
> From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:20 PM
> To: Michael Glenney
> Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
> Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or "super" catch-all
>
> Michael Glenney:
> > I set it up as a map as you sp
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:40:58 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> This is known as a "Prove You Love Me" scheme and is, essentially,
> offloading your spam problems onto everyone else who sends you mail.
> You will find a LOT of people are pissed off by these PYLM emails,
> and will not reply.
Nor will si
Michael Glenney:
> I set it up as a map as you specified.
And you failed to create the destination email account first.
My example requires that the address "u...@example.com" as used in
the example already works.
/etc/postfix/main.cf
virtual_alias_maps = static:u...@example.co
>
> I told you to use a virtual alias MAP. I did not tell you to use
> a virtual alias DOMAIN.
>
> My example requires that you can already receive mail at
> u...@example.com. Never will Postfix create an account just
> because you send mail to it.
>
> See http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.
Michael Glenney:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:00 PM
> > To: Michael Glenney
> > Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
> > Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or "super" catch-all
> >
> > Michael Glen
> -Original Message-
> From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:00 PM
> To: Michael Glenney
> Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
> Subject: Re: Need to create a mail dead-end or "super" catch-all
>
> Michael Glenney:
> >
> > I have a request from one
On 10-Jun-2009, at 01:24, Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with
captcha and that works with postfix.
The idea is, when somebody sends me an email and this address have
never sent me any other mail, automatically the sender receives a
message with
On 10-Jun-2009, at 03:52, Michael Wang wrote:
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since
the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my
personal email on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess
with it since it has been running rock solid and
Michael Wang wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Michael Wang:
> [...snip...]
>>> Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
>>
>> Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
>
> So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year. Assuming that, I
> have (very) roughly 6 months + some unknown amount of t
You didn't specify enough details. What firewall you are using, what
your DNS servers run, etc. But, I had a similar situation at my last
company. We were using BIND for DNS and setup a different view for the
firewall. That may be one option.
It may be a better option just to setup a rule on
Zitat von Michael Wang :
Gerard wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:52:32 -0700
Michael Wang wrote:
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since
the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal
email on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess w
Hello,
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 09:24:09 AM +0200, Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
Good morning,
...
if you aren't convinced yet, there is also
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cr/index.html
If you're still not yet convinced, take a look at w3.org opinion :
http://www.w3.org
* Simon Jones :
> This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger?
You COULD use smtp_source
OR
your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then test it manually using
telnet.
Keep in mind, though:
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions = $mynetworks
so the test must be pe
2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Simon Jones :
>
>> > http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html#conn_limit
>
>> ok thanks - I added those to main.cf
>
> What EXACTLY did you add?
>
>> but it still doesn't do anything,
>
> Of course it doesn't do anything per se!
>
> Shit needs to hit the fan before
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> Shit needs to hit the fan before something happens. Did you throw enough
> shit in the general direction of the fan to faicilitaty a hitting of the
> fan?
If the shit doesn't hit the fan, Postfix will log some info - in my
case every 10 minutes:
Jun 10 15:40:03 mail postfi
* Simon Jones :
> > http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html#conn_limit
> ok thanks - I added those to main.cf
What EXACTLY did you add?
> but it still doesn't do anything,
Of course it doesn't do anything per se!
Shit needs to hit the fan before something happens. Did you throw enough
shi
> I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on
> Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam
implementation. I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix/ but when i enable
the config within main.cf smtpd_error_sleep_time = 1s and grep on maillog
there's no e
Simon Jones wrote:
> ok thanks - I added those to main.cf but it still doesn't do anything,
> I have googled - oooh yes I have googled something good but it still
> doesn't make sense how to get postfix working with anvil, there's
> plenty of info on config but how do i get pfx to pass info to anvi
2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Simon Jones :
>
>> > That does not enable anvil.
>
>> can you point me to some docs on how to do it perhaps? would be much
>> appreciated, this is something i cam across today so apologies for
>> coming across as a complete noob...
>
> http://www.postfix.org/TUNING
* Simon Jones :
> > That does not enable anvil.
> can you point me to some docs on how to do it perhaps? would be much
> appreciated, this is something i cam across today so apologies for
> coming across as a complete noob...
http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html#conn_limit
--
Ralf Hildebr
2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Simon Jones :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on
>> Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam
>> implementation. I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix/ but when i
>> enable the config withi
* Simon Jones :
> Hi folks,
>
> I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on
> Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam
> implementation. I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix/ but when i
> enable the config within main.cf smtpd_error_sleep_time = 1
Hi folks,
I have postfix 2.3.3 installed and have just found some info on
Anvil(8) which looks like it should be good as part of my anti-spam
implementation. I can see anvil in /usr/libexec/postfix/ but when i
enable the config within main.cf smtpd_error_sleep_time = 1s and grep
on maillog there'
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 14:00:28 Sthu Pous wrote:
> > Read the log (and post it if you need help).
>
> I do not know why but now I get error:
>
> 502 5.5.1 Error: command not implemented
>
> on server side I see:
>
> lost connection after STARTTLS from unknown[1.2.3.4]
Honestly, you don't sound
Michael Wang:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Michael Wang:
> [...snip...]
> >> Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
> >
> > Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
>
> So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year.
I can't predict when that would happen. Updates for Postfix 2.3
will cea
Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Wang:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Wang:
[...snip...]
Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year.
I can't predict when that would happen. Updates for Postfix 2.3
will c
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 13:46:08 Sthu Pous wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
> > See my other reply. The server does not announce STARTTLS support.
>
> I got it already, also I have posted here my current configuration
> (postconf -n), could You please tell me what to edit, or
Thank You for Your time and answer, Rainer:
> > 454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem
> >
> > And what is the local problem? Some permissions?
>
> Read the log (and post it if you need help).
I do not know why but now I get error:
502 5.5.1 Error: command not implemented
on server
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> I scanned the Postfix documentation for stress_expire_time and could only find
> it in master_avail.c, where it is set to 1000s.
>
> So the stress recheck interval is 1000s, correct?
Yes, and this is not configurable. The benefits are less than the
cost of having to explain
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
> See my other reply. The server does not announce STARTTLS support.
I got it already, also I have posted here my current configuration (postconf
-n), could You please tell me what to edit, or how I can find the culprit?
Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Wang:
[...snip...]
Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year. Assuming that, I have
(very) roughly 6 months + some unknown amount of time past that if or
when a securi
Gerard wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:52:32 -0700
Michael Wang wrote:
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since
the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal
email on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess with it
since it has been ru
Zitat von Michael Wang :
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since
the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my
personal email on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess
with it since it has been running rock solid and it does have quite
On 6/10/2009 12:16 AM, June Qiu wrote:
> I can send short emails (1KB) from my mailserver (abc.domain.com) to
> gmail account (t...@gmail.com), but for larger emails (7KB), it
> fails. It gets deferred on the mail queue forever. But this same mail
> can be sent to yahoo.
>
> Am I missing somethin
* Harakiri :
> > Use a makefile to assemble main.cf from parts
>
> How should that work if i just have unison/rsync between a few servers and
> they only sync each other - there is no option to execute make everytime
Simply run "make" in the directory every minute. Or use incrond
--
Ralf Hild
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> From: Ralf Hildebrandt
> Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM
> * Harakiri :
> >
> > Is it possible to specify the blackhole servers in a
> separate file? I
Michael Wang:
> I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since the
> end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal email
> on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess with it since it
> has been running rock solid and it does have quite a few "mo
* Harakiri :
>
> Is it possible to specify the blackhole servers in a separate file? I
> only found the option, that you specify reject_rbl_client in the
> main.cf multiple times. My problem is that i have a cluster of postfix
> servers and settings like transport map and relay domains are all in
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:52:32 -0700
Michael Wang wrote:
>I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since
>the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal
>email on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess with it
>since it has been running rock so
Is it possible to specify the blackhole servers in a separate file? I only
found the option, that you specify reject_rbl_client in the main.cf multiple
times. My problem is that i have a cluster of postfix servers and settings like
transport map and relay domains are all in a seperate file whic
I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since the
end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal email
on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess with it since it
has been running rock solid and it does have quite a few "moving parts"
to it.
Dear Pros.
The following is my setup
H.O
^
|
|
point
to
point
|
|
Postfix<---> Firewall <---> External Mail Hosting
Mail Server
Postfix Mail Server (postfix-2.3.3-2) on CentOS 5.2;
a. receives mails from local client via outlook and send to out side (internet)
directly
b. rec
Dear Pros'
I am facing a problem in getting system generated mails to my local mailbox.
let me explain the scenario.
Postfix Mail Server <---> Firewall <---> External Mail Hosting
example.comexternal.com
To our internal Postfix Mail Server, we are receiving
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> I scanned the Postfix documentation for stress_expire_time and could only find
> it in master_avail.c, where it is set to 1000s.
>
> So the stress recheck interval is 1000s, correct?
>
> Did I miss that in the official documentation? I believe it should be part of
> the
I scanned the Postfix documentation for stress_expire_time and could only find
it in master_avail.c, where it is set to 1000s.
So the stress recheck interval is 1000s, correct?
Did I miss that in the official documentation? I believe it should be part of
the official documentation. I can write a
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Gábor Lénárt :
>
> > > This is a backscatter source and will get you blacklisted in no time.
> >
> > Hmm, what would be if someone use a policy server, rejecting the mail with
> > the link for the captcha URL in it.
>
> That sound interesting. It
* Gábor Lénárt :
> > This is a backscatter source and will get you blacklisted in no time.
>
> Hmm, what would be if someone use a policy server, rejecting the mail with
> the link for the captcha URL in it.
That sound interesting. It could work! It definitely solves the
backscatter issue.
--
Hei,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:29:06AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with
> > captcha and that works with postfix.
> >
> > The idea is, when somebody sends me an email and this address have
> > never sent me any other mail, automati
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 09:24:09 AM +0200, Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with
> captcha and that works with postfix.
> ...
> Using a tool like this I can stop all spam mail that arrives my inbox.
Gabriel,
tools like these are
* Gabriel Hahmann :
> Good morning,
>
> I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with
> captcha and that works with postfix.
>
> The idea is, when somebody sends me an email and this address have
> never sent me any other mail, automatically the sender receives a
> message with
Good morning,
I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with
captcha and that works with postfix.
The idea is, when somebody sends me an email and this address have
never sent me any other mail, automatically the sender receives a
message with a web link, explaining that is the f
i feel like you can use ;
always_bcc = mailc...@yourdomain.com
in /etc/postfix/main.cf file
this will keep a copy of all mails which is received and send by your system in
mailcopy mailbox.
-
--
---
Always try to find truth!!!
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> From: Wietse Ve
73 matches
Mail list logo
