Re: Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Curtis wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> >> Curtis: >> > I'm building a spam filtering appliance using Postfix.  We will be >> > making >> > every effort to reject invalid recipient addresses at SMTP time, but >> > since >> > we will

Re: Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

Curtis: > What I'd prefer to do here is have the bounces held for customer review so > that they can realize that they've got an email address that isn't > delivering and fix the problem on their end. Sorry, that does not work. Even my two-user domain sometimes gets thousands of email messages a

Re: Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Curtis: > > I'm building a spam filtering appliance using Postfix. We will be making > > every effort to reject invalid recipient addresses at SMTP time, but > since > > we will not always be made aware when an email box on a final destinati

Re: Anti spam settings just for incoming emails?

bob 001 a écrit : > Thank you for the response. > > After some more thoughts being an announce only list, how about > something like this.. > > 1. Only specific email addresses are allowed to send email to announce-list. > E.g.-> only a...@gmail.com , b...@hotmail.com and c...@ymail.com can s

Re: Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

Curtis: > I'm building a spam filtering appliance using Postfix. We will be making > every effort to reject invalid recipient addresses at SMTP time, but since > we will not always be made aware when an email box on a final destination > server is no longer valid, we'd like to disable all bouncing

Re: Anti spam settings just for incoming emails?

Thank you for the response. After some more thoughts being an announce only list, how about something like this.. 1. Only specific email addresses are allowed to send email to announce-list. E.g.-> only a...@gmail.com , b...@hotmail.com and c...@ymail.com can send email to mail ids on our ser

Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

I'm building a spam filtering appliance using Postfix. We will be making every effort to reject invalid recipient addresses at SMTP time, but since we will not always be made aware when an email box on a final destination server is no longer valid, we'd like to disable all bouncing after SMTP time

Re: Multiple relay destinations

Patrick Saweikis wrote: The one problem I ran into is that we normally use the format smtp:[10.1.1.7], when I kept patsaw.local in brackets it tried to deliver to the A record, I had to take it out of brackets for postfix to do an mx lookup. The examples Viktor posted didn't include brackets. T

Re: Anti spam settings just for incoming emails?

bob 001 wrote: Hello All, Couple questions. Appreciate your responses. 1. Is there any way to set anti spam settings just for incoming emails to server? It is announce-only mailing list. So, not much worried about outgoing stuff for now. We can change it later to check for both ways if the rea

Re: Escaping '^From ' in the body

On 8-May-2009, at 04:02, mouss wrote: LuKreme a écrit : On 7-May-2009, at 16:01, mouss wrote: procmail isn't part of postfix. so test without procmail. If I send a message to a non-procmail enabled account, it delivers to a mbox file in $HOME/Maildir/ with a name like msg.Dv4Z. where d

RE: Multiple relay destinations

>> Patrick Saweikis wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> >> >> We are using postfix 2.3.8 and have it integrated with >> mysql and transport maps are set on a per domain basis this way >> (transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf, >> mysql-transport.cf contains the authentication a

Anti spam settings just for incoming emails?

Hello All, Couple questions. Appreciate your responses. 1. Is there any way to set anti spam settings just for incoming emails to server? It is announce-only mailing list.  So, not much worried about outgoing stuff for now.  We can change it later to check for both ways if the reason arises so. 2

Re: cannot connect to mysql. Too many conections.

On May 8, 2009 10:31:37 am Wietse Venema wrote: > Ray: > > Hello, > > > > System is FreeBSD 7.0, postfix 2.6.2, mysql storage of user info, > > amvisd-new, and dovecot for authentication and pop/imap. postconf -n at > > end of post. > > > > Just Yesterday I started receiving a lot of > > "warning:

Re: Multiple relay destinations

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:28:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Victor Duchovni: > > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:45:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > > Patrick Saweikis: > > > > We are now trying to incorporate a way to create redundancy > > > > on the relay end, so currently w

Re: Multiple relay destinations

Victor Duchovni: > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:45:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Patrick Saweikis: > > > We are now trying to incorporate a way to create redundancy > > > on the relay end, so currently we may just have the transport map set to > > > "smtp:[10.1.1.7]" and are try

Re: Multiple relay destinations

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:45:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Patrick Saweikis: > > We are now trying to incorporate a way to create redundancy > > on the relay end, so currently we may just have the transport map set to > > "smtp:[10.1.1.7]" and are trying to find a way to tell it

Re: Multiple relay destinations

Patrick Saweikis: > We are now trying to incorporate a way to create redundancy > on the relay end, so currently we may just have the transport map set to > "smtp:[10.1.1.7]" and are trying to find a way to tell it that if it > cannot relay to the transport_maps location, try this other

Re: Multiple relay destinations

2009/5/9 Patrick Saweikis : > relay to the transport_maps location, try this other. I had done some > research and found that smtp_fallback_relay should do what I need. I tried > implementing this without success, I am getting “unknown mail transport > error” when enabling that option, whether the

Re: Multiple relay destinations

Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > Patrick Saweikis wrote: > >> >> We are now trying to incorporate a way to create >> redundancy on the relay end, so currently we may just have the >> transport map set to “smtp:[10.1.1.7]” and are trying to find a way to >> tell it that if it canno

Re: Multiple relay destinations

Patrick Saweikis wrote: > > Hello > > > > We are using postfix 2.3.8 and have it integrated with > mysql and transport maps are set on a per domain basis this way > (transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf, > mysql-transport.cf contains the authentication and mysql quer

Re: cannot connect to mysql. Too many conections.

Ray: > Hello, > > System is FreeBSD 7.0, postfix 2.6.2, mysql storage of user info, amvisd-new, > and dovecot for authentication and pop/imap. postconf -n at end of post. > > Just Yesterday I started receiving a lot of > "warning: connect to mysql server localhost: Too many connections" > (Samp

Re: using postfix as a front end server in an exchange environment

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 12:20:26PM -0400, Comtois, Andre wrote: > > I'm having mixed results getting this to work. My postfix server > accepts emails and relays them to the exchange server just fine, however > it also seems to have no issues relaying emails to gmail.com as well, so > I'm not sur

Re: using postfix as a front end server in an exchange environment

Comtois, Andre a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > > > First off, my apologies if this topic has been address before. I’ve > been searching in google for days now and had mixed results in finding > answers to my questions. > > > > To put it simply, I have installed postfix on a system running ubu

cannot connect to mysql. Too many conections.

Hello, System is FreeBSD 7.0, postfix 2.6.2, mysql storage of user info, amvisd-new, and dovecot for authentication and pop/imap. postconf -n at end of post. Just Yesterday I started receiving a lot of "warning: connect to mysql server localhost: Too many connections" (Sample log files follow s

Multiple relay destinations

Hello We are using postfix 2.3.8 and have it integrated with mysql and transport maps are set on a per domain basis this way (transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf, mysql-transport.cf contains the authentication and mysql query to retrieve this info).

using postfix as a front end server in an exchange environment

Hi everyone, First off, my apologies if this topic has been address before. I've been searching in google for days now and had mixed results in finding answers to my questions. To put it simply, I have installed postfix on a system running ubuntu 9.04. I would like to configure it as a fr

RE: private/hash

Thanks all! > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Magnus Bäck > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 6:00 PM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: private/hash > > On Friday, May 08, 2009 at 17:45 CEST, >

Re: Using a Virtual Domain Host in smtp_helo_name

Gurunandan R. Bhat a écrit : > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:51 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote: >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Gurunandan R. Bhat > > wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have Postfix configured with virtual hosts and mailboxes. >> > I would like to configur

Re: private/hash

On Fri May 8 2009 10:45:33 Rocco Scappatura wrote: > Sorry, > > > On Fri May 8 2009 10:20:22 Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > > I get: > > > > > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or > > > directory > > > > And which process gives you this warning? You snipped out > > signific

Re: private/hash

On Friday, May 08, 2009 at 17:45 CEST, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > And which process gives you this warning? You snipped out > > significant portions of the log, so definitive help is not possible. > > May 8 17:16:50 av3 postfix/local[3419]: fatal: connect #11 to > subsystem private/hash:

Re: private/hash

Rocco Scappatura wrote: mailbox_transport = hash:/etc/postfix/transport Remove the above setting. -- Noel Jones

Re: Urgent Postfix User Unknown issue:

Dear , Sorry for being poor etiquette, honestly i meant to get this issue in to be noticed and so i hope someone will help me asap. I always appreciate you guy's inspiration to assist others. Regards, Hemanth On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:17 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Fri May 8 2009 10:03:05 Hemant

Re: Urgent Postfix User Unknown issue:

On Fri May 8 2009 10:03:05 Hemanth Gopal wrote: > Any help will be appreciated. First, please do not top-post your replies, as it makes the list archives much harder to follow. Consider your readers' time and convenience to be much more important than your own. Second, "Urgent" in the subject i

RE: private/hash

Sorry, > On Fri May 8 2009 10:20:22 Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > I get: > > > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or > > directory > > And which process gives you this warning? You snipped out significant > portions of the log, so definitive help is not possible. May 8

RE: private/hash

Hello, > Rocco Scappatura: > > Hello, > > > > I get: > > > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or > directory > > You have configured a hash: LOOKUP TABLE where Postfix expects a > SERVICE NAME (such as a content filter or policy service). > > Use "ls -lt" to find out w

Re: private/hash

Rocco Scappatura: > Hello, > > I get: > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or directory You have configured a hash: LOOKUP TABLE where Postfix expects a SERVICE NAME (such as a content filter or policy service). Use "ls -lt" to find out what Postfix config files you h

Re: private/hash

On Fri May 8 2009 10:20:22 Rocco Scappatura wrote: > I get: > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or > directory And which process gives you this warning? You snipped out significant portions of the log, so definitive help is not possible. > In main.cf I set: > > virtua

RE: private/hash

> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hayes > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 5:22 PM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: private/hash > > Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I get: > > > >

Re: private/hash

Rocco Scappatura wrote: > Hello, > > I get: > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or directory > > In main.cf I set: > > virtual_alias_domains = domain.tld > virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual > > while in /etc/postfix/virtual > > kubasms@ domain.tld

private/hash

Hello, I get: warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or directory In main.cf I set: virtual_alias_domains = domain.tld virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual while in /etc/postfix/virtual kubasms@ domain.tld autogerma@ domain2.tld kubasms-notifiche@ doma

Re: Question re: blocking unwanted senders

On 5/8/2009 10:20 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: >> I thought that since the check was under smtpd_recipient_restrictions >> that all of those checks would be applied before the recipient was >> 'validated'... apparently that assumption was incorrect and the >> source of my problem... > Well, they ARE, but

Re: Urgent Postfix User Unknown issue:

Any help will be appreciated. Regards, Hemanth On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Hemanth Gopal wrote: > Thanks Geert > > Jamm+postfix implementation, I can search through mailboxes as per > ldap details in the vdomain.cf, vaccounts.cf > > r...@hydra:/etc/postfix# postconf -n > alias_database = has

Re: Question re: blocking unwanted senders

On Fri May 8 2009 06:38:44 Charles Marcus wrote: > I thought that since the check was under smtpd_recipient_restrictions > that all of those checks would be applied before the recipient was > 'validated'... apparently that assumption was incorrect and the > source of my problem... Well, they ARE,

Re: Urgent Postfix User Unknown issue:

Thanks Geert Jamm+postfix implementation, I can search through mailboxes as per ldap details in the vdomain.cf, vaccounts.cf r...@hydra:/etc/postfix# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases append_dot_mydomain = no biff = no config_directory = /etc/postfix de

Re: Urgent Postfix User Unknown issue:

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:55:03PM +0530, Hemanth Gopal wrote: > Hello friends > > I am facing issue with postfix -ldap implementation that even if i can > search through ldap search given in the ldap login credentials > provided in vaccounts.cf valias.cf vdomain.cf. Postfix still > rejecting

Urgent Postfix User Unknown issue:

Hello friends I am facing issue with postfix -ldap implementation that even if i can search through ldap search given in the ldap login credentials provided in vaccounts.cf valias.cf vdomain.cf. Postfix still rejecting mails saying May 8 15:22:22 hydra postfix/smtpd[26744]: NOQUEUE: reject:

Re: SASL against multiple hosts

2009/5/6 Laurent Dilain : > Is there a way to use 2 mixed SASL auth on a server ? > Is it possible to use a remote Dovecot server for SASL ? You could add Dovecot SASL to Server01. Auth could then be done against the MySQL db used by Server02. As long as usernames/domains are remaining the same I

Re: Using a Virtual Domain Host in smtp_helo_name

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:51 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Gurunandan R. Bhat wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have Postfix configured with virtual hosts and mailboxes. > > I would like to configure Postfix so that it sends a per-virtual-domain > > hostname a

Re: SASL against multiple hosts

Laurent Dilain a écrit : > Hello ! > > I'm currently migrating my mail server from an old Fedora to an Ubuntu LTS. > > My configuration : > Server01 (old Fedora) : > POP3/IMAP/SMTP ports open to Internet > Postfix Server with SASL authentification against local PAM db > Dovecot Server with local

Re: Mails stuck in incoming queue

* ram : > # Log anything (except mail) of level info or higher. > # Don't log private authentication messages! > *.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none/var/log/messages *.info;mail;authpriv;cron;local7;local6.none /var/log/messages otherwise /var/log/messages will contain loc

Re: Using a Virtual Domain Host in smtp_helo_name

Gurunandan R. Bhat a écrit : > Hi, > > I have Postfix configured with virtual hosts and mailboxes. > I would like to configure Postfix so that it sends a > per-virtual-domain hostname as smtp_helo_name when it delivers to other > smtp servers. > Is this possible? Or desirable? In mos

Re: Using a Virtual Domain Host in smtp_helo_name

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Gurunandan R. Bhat wrote: > Hi, > >     I have Postfix configured with virtual hosts and mailboxes. >     I would like to configure Postfix so that it sends a per-virtual-domain > hostname as smtp_helo_name when it delivers to other smtp servers. >     Is this possi

Re: Question re: blocking unwanted senders

On 5/8/2009, Sahil Tandon (sa...@tandon.net) wrote: >> Webroots service simply proxies the recipient validation... so normally, >> no, this would not be a problem... but, I opened a ticket with them >> yesterday morning in case Rik used some kind of malformed message to >> trigger a bug in their sy

Re: Question re: blocking unwanted senders

On Fri, 08 May 2009, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 5/7/2009 7:30 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > >> relayhost = [post18.emailfiltering.com] > > > Interesting. > > >> May 6 15:22:06 myhost postfix/smtpd[4799]: connect from > >> ixe-mta-18-tx.emailfiltering.com[194.116.198.213] > >> May 6 15:22:06 myhost

Re: Mails stuck in incoming queue

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 11:27 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * ram : > > > > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > * ram : > > > > > > > Thanks for all the info. Well the high incoming queue is definitely is > > > > due to syslog. Because I also notice that some of my

Re: Question re: blocking unwanted senders

On 5/7/2009 7:30 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> relayhost = [post18.emailfiltering.com] > Interesting. >> May 6 15:22:06 myhost postfix/smtpd[4799]: connect from >> ixe-mta-18-tx.emailfiltering.com[194.116.198.213] >> May 6 15:22:06 myhost postfix/smtpd[4799]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from >> ixe-mta-

Re: Escaping '^From ' in the body

LuKreme a écrit : > On 7-May-2009, at 16:01, mouss wrote: >> procmail isn't part of postfix. so test without procmail. > > > If I send a message to a non-procmail enabled account, it delivers to a > mbox file in $HOME/Maildir/ with a name like msg.Dv4Z. > where did "msg.Dv4Z" come from? make su

Re: Mails stuck in incoming queue

* ram : > > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > * ram : > > > > > Thanks for all the info. Well the high incoming queue is definitely is > > > due to syslog. Because I also notice that some of my logs are also > > > getting dropped. > > > > > > Sorry for being OT , b

Re: Mails stuck in incoming queue

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * ram : > > > Thanks for all the info. Well the high incoming queue is definitely is > > due to syslog. Because I also notice that some of my logs are also > > getting dropped. > > > > Sorry for being OT , but can someone help me fin

Using a Virtual Domain Host in smtp_helo_name

Hi, I have Postfix configured with virtual hosts and mailboxes. I would like to configure Postfix so that it sends a per-virtual-domain hostname as smtp_helo_name when it delivers to other smtp servers. Is this possible? Or desirable? Thank you for your attention Regards Gurunan

Re: Mails stuck in incoming queue

* ram : > Thanks for all the info. Well the high incoming queue is definitely is > due to syslog. Because I also notice that some of my logs are also > getting dropped. > > Sorry for being OT , but can someone help me find what is wrong with my > syslogd. Show the config. -- Ralf Hildebran