2009/4/18 LuKreme :
> Well, that's not quite it. The issue is not simply that I don't want SMTP
> connections out of this LAN to servers other than the mail.example.com
> server (that is dealt with with relayhost, iirc)
Firewall policy :)
> but that no outbound mail
> should be accepted unless it
Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> We recently took over a company that used SPF.
>
> Because our e-mail infra is way more complicated than theirs and we have
> tons of external parties who send mails using our domains, we decided
> long ago not to use SPF.
>
>
>
svoop a écrit :
> Hi
>
> My mailserver (mail.bitcetera.com) is behind a router that gets a dynamic IP
> (87.221.120.44) from the ISP. In order to prevent outgoing mail from being
> considered spam due to the dynamic IP, I've configured the ISP's mailserver as
> relayhost.
>
> Unfortunately, Yahoo
On 17-Apr-2009, at 05:00, Barney Desmond wrote:
2009/4/17 LuKreme :
What I want to do is to have users
on the LAN send emails to other users on the LAN
(u...@example.local) and
have those email addresses mapped to specific addresses on the
remote server
(f...@example.com, served by mail.exa
* i...@comtek.co.uk :
> Hi,
>
> I am using Postfix with the virtual agent to deliver to Maildirs for LDAP
> users. We use
> Courier IMAP to pick up mail. This all works fine, but I would like to
> provide Sieve for
> users. I have been looking at maidag
> (http://www.gnu.org/software/mailutils
* Wietse Venema :
> I don't think it is a good idea to tweak each individual reject
> message. It makes perhaps more sense to append the same "for support
> please (call xxx|see http://mumble/)" text to all reject messages.
That was my proposal when he called me.
> Of couse no-one ever reads suc
2009/4/18 i...@comtek.co.uk :
I can't answer all your questions, but...
> Would it be reasonable to use 'pipe' and pass mail for delivery to maidag
> instead of 'virtual'?
> I'm interested to note that I can find no references to maidag being used
> with Postfix. Can
> anybody foresee problems wi
i...@comtek.co.uk:
> I am also wondering if there is an unreasonable overhead involved.
> pipe will have to spawn maidag for each Maildir; is this reasonable?
Postfix reuses a proces for multiple deliveries. You can also reuse
non-Postfix delivery processes with systems that use the LMTP
protocol
On Friday 17 April 2009 18:16:01 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > > Mailbox files, on the other hand, are usually overwritten, and they
> > > are updated in place. This almost works reliably, especially if
> > > you use dotlock files and
Hi,
I am using Postfix with the virtual agent to deliver to Maildirs for
LDAP users. We use
Courier IMAP to pick up mail. This all works fine, but I would like to
provide Sieve for
users. I have been looking at maidag
(http://www.gnu.org/software/mailutils/manual/html_node/maidag.html).
Woul
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > Mailbox files, on the other hand, are usually overwritten, and they
> > are updated in place. This almost works reliably, especially if
> > you use dotlock files and turn off NFS attribute caching.
> >
> And I was talking about O
On 4/17/2009 9:08 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Jeff,
One more thing I noticed today also. All messages which have the "+" in
the e-mail are sent to Dovecot's Deliver twice. So, I receive the
message twice in the folder. All other messages are only sent to
Deliver once. Any idea what I have
On Friday 17 April 2009 14:01:07 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Melvyn Sopacua:
> > > On Friday 17 April 2009 01:23:20 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Also, any technical objections against moving shared files into an nfs
> > > mounted directory and adjusting main.cf to look there?
> >
> >
Jeff,
> One more thing I noticed today also. All messages which have the "+" in
> the e-mail are sent to Dovecot's Deliver twice. So, I receive the
> message twice in the folder. All other messages are only sent to
> Deliver once. Any idea what I have configured wrong for the message to
> be s
* Wietse Venema :
> > a customer asked me to help them customize Postfix replies, so clients
> > (better: users) can get a hint why their message is being rejected.
> >
> > The idea is to refer to an URL in the reply where (generic) verbose
> > explanations on the reject reason can be found. Somet
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:26:50AM -0400, Shelley Waltz wrote:
> Apr 12 05:25:21 roadrunner postfix/smtp[10809]: B7D9311D8008:
> to=, relay=none, delay=43453,
> delays=43453/0.01/0/0, dsn=4.4.6, status=SOFTBOUNCE (mail for
> buena.cabm.rutgers.edu loops back to myself)
Masquerading is not applied
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:11:36AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Thanks for the information. The problem I have with that is all of my
> > > > > users
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> Wietse,
>
> a customer asked me to help them customize Postfix replies, so clients
> (better: users) can get a hint why their message is being rejected.
>
> The idea is to refer to an URL in the reply where (generic) verbose
> explanations on the reject reason can be found.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:16:17AM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> Thanks for the help and information. I am going to see if I can figure out
> how to configure Dovecot to use mailbox_transport with system users.
Works here for Cyrus IMAP. The key question is who owns the mailboxes,
and how does
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:11:36AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> >
> > > > Thanks for the information. The problem I have with that is all of my
> > > > users are local system users. I don't think
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:22:00AM -0400, Shelley Waltz wrote:
>
>> >> # postconf -n
>> >> masquerade_domains = !master2.cabm.rutgers.edu
>> !raven.cabm.rutgers.edu
>> >> !heron.cabm.rutgers.edu cabm.rutgers.edu
>> >
>> > This looks OK, show unedited (consistent localpart
On 4/17/2009 7:11 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Jeff Grossman wrote:
On 4/16/2009 10:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:24:54PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I have set up "recipient_delimiter = +" so I could put a folder name
in an
e-mail addres
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:11:36AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
> > > Thanks for the information. The problem I have with that is all of my
> > > users are local system users. I don't think I can use
> > > mailbox_transport with local users only virtual users. I
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:22:00AM -0400, Shelley Waltz wrote:
> >> # postconf -n
> >> masquerade_domains = !master2.cabm.rutgers.edu !raven.cabm.rutgers.edu
> >> !heron.cabm.rutgers.edu cabm.rutgers.edu
> >
> > This looks OK, show unedited (consistent localpart mangling is OK, if you
> > mangle c
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:11:36AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> > Thanks for the information. The problem I have with that is all of my
> > users are local system users. I don't think I can use
> > mailbox_transport with local users only virtual users. It appears the
> > only way
Jeff Grossman wrote:
> On 4/16/2009 10:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:24:54PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have set up "recipient_delimiter = +" so I could put a folder name
>>> in an
>>> e-mail address and have it automatically filtered for me. I am usin
On 4/17/2009 6:54 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On 4/16/2009 10:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:24:54PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I have set up "recipient_delimiter = +" so I could put a folder name
in an
e-mail address and have it automatically filtered for me. I am us
On 4/16/2009 10:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:24:54PM -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I have set up "recipient_delimiter = +" so I could put a folder name in an
e-mail address and have it automatically filtered for me. I am using
"mailbox_command = /usr/local/libexec
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:36:44PM -0400, Shelley Waltz wrote:
>
>> master.cf
>>
>> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
>> pickupfifo n - n 60 1 pickup
>> cleanup unix n - n - 0 cl
Wietse,
a customer asked me to help them customize Postfix replies, so clients
(better: users) can get a hint why their message is being rejected.
The idea is to refer to an URL in the reply where (generic) verbose
explanations on the reject reason can be found. Something along these lines:
5x
Seth Mattinen:
> "Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
> name=mail.x.net type=A: Host found but no data record of requested type"
The DNS server reported that the destination has no MX record (RFC
5321 requires MX before A lookups) and that the destination has no
A record.
W
Wietse Venema:
> Melvyn Sopacua:
> > On Friday 17 April 2009 01:23:20 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Juan Antonio Cuesta:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > i have two postfix servers, and when i have to do any change in
> > > > virtual file or in aliases file i must to do the same change in the 2
> > > >
Melvyn Sopacua:
> On Friday 17 April 2009 01:23:20 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Juan Antonio Cuesta:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > i have two postfix servers, and when i have to do any change in
> > > virtual file or in aliases file i must to do the same change in the 2
> > > servers.
> > >
> > > Can someon
2009/4/17 LuKreme :
> I have a LAN with several computers on it used by a variety of users. I
> have one server on the LAN running OS X and have postfix installed (probably
> needs updating, but not gotten that far). What I want to do is to have users
> on the LAN send emails to other users on the
"martijn.list" wrote:
> > I’m no expert on SPF but as far as I understand it only checks if a
> > sender is ‘allowed’ to send using that domain, so no relation what so
> > ever on dropping mail from parties that don’t use SPF… Or am I missing
> > something?
>
> A lot of statistics are used to fi
I’m no expert on SPF but as far as I understand it only checks if a
sender is ‘allowed’ to send using that domain, so no relation what so
ever on dropping mail from parties that don’t use SPF…
Or am I missing something?
A lot of statistics are used to filter out spam so it wouldn't surprise
m
On Friday 17 April 2009 01:23:20 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Juan Antonio Cuesta:
> > Hello,
> >
> > i have two postfix servers, and when i have to do any change in
> > virtual file or in aliases file i must to do the same change in the 2
> > servers.
> >
> > Can someone say me how can i do my job more
I have a LAN with several computers on it used by a variety of users.
I have one server on the LAN running OS X and have postfix installed
(probably needs updating, but not gotten that far). What I want to do
is to have users on the LAN send emails to other users on the LAN (u...@example.loc
On 16-Apr-2009, at 23:44, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Don't use mailbox_command, use mailbox_transport (assuming that in
your
case deliver can work acceptably running as a fixed pipe(8) user
rather
than as the recipient). The recipient extension in local(8)
deliveries is
converted to lower-case (
W dniu 2009-04-17 08:50, Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL pisze:
Hi All,
We recently took over a company that used SPF.
Because our e-mail infra is way more complicated than theirs and we
have tons of external parties who send mails using our domains, we
decided long ago not to use SPF.
40 matches
Mail list logo
