Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> 
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:11:36AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > Thanks for the information.  The problem I have with that is all of my
> > > > > users are local system users.  I don't think I can use
> > > > > mailbox_transport with local users only virtual users.  It appears the
> > > > > only way I can do what I want is to switch to virtual users.
> > > > You are confusing mailbox_transport and virtual_transport.
> > > > 
> > > > See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_transport
> > > 
> > > Perhaps, but not necessarily, the key issue is how the location and
> > > ownership of the mailboxes and how the IMAP server accesses them.
> > > One can use mailbox_transport with system users, but the mail will
> > > belong to the uid of the delivery agent, not the system user.
> > 
> > They could do "mailbox_transport = virtual".
> 
> Yes, but the whole point at the start of the thread was Dovecot delivery
> to extension-based folders...
> 
> I am however puzzled by the local(8) documentation update in the 20060202
> snapshot:

Postfix local() folds all text to the left of the right-most @.
This won't change until pipe(8)-like functionality is put into
every delivery agent. I don't want multiple copies of code doing
similar things.

        Wietse

Reply via email to