Victor Duchovni: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Victor Duchovni: > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:11:36AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for the information. The problem I have with that is all of my > > > > > users are local system users. I don't think I can use > > > > > mailbox_transport with local users only virtual users. It appears the > > > > > only way I can do what I want is to switch to virtual users. > > > > You are confusing mailbox_transport and virtual_transport. > > > > > > > > See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_transport > > > > > > Perhaps, but not necessarily, the key issue is how the location and > > > ownership of the mailboxes and how the IMAP server accesses them. > > > One can use mailbox_transport with system users, but the mail will > > > belong to the uid of the delivery agent, not the system user. > > > > They could do "mailbox_transport = virtual". > > Yes, but the whole point at the start of the thread was Dovecot delivery > to extension-based folders... > > I am however puzzled by the local(8) documentation update in the 20060202 > snapshot:
Postfix local() folds all text to the left of the right-most @. This won't change until pipe(8)-like functionality is put into every delivery agent. I don't want multiple copies of code doing similar things. Wietse