Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:25 CET,
"Daniel L. Miller" wrote:
What I have/had now was the following:
master.cf:
192.168.0.11:smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
-o relayhost=[192.168.0.10]:225
192.168.0.11:125 inet n -
Ray(r...@stilltech.net)@Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:32:40PM -0700:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:10:22 Bill Weiss wrote:
(lots of content snipped for context)
> > Have you tried getting a pcap while the mystery server is supposed to be
> > sending you mail?
>
> Haven't done this yet, but I will try
Summary:
I realize that the problem most likely is not due to postfix (thus the OT in
the subject), but I figured someone here might have seen this before
Server is live and fully functional. it deals with thousands of messages per
day and has for over a year. One user can't receive messages
One of my clients sends mail using a custom application which *cannot*
recognize a smtpd error message .. like user-not-found, or
invalid-domain etc
Now they want our postfix server to accept all mails without checks and
send NDR's for undeliverable mails.
Can I write a special transport in post
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 20:18:18 Paweł Leśniak wrote:
[snip]
> Sure. I'm sending myself emails sometime. But I'm using server which is
> permitted to send with address from my domain. So that's surely not 100%
> spam when sender eq recipient. But then we come to definition of spam. It's
in simp
Ray wrote:
Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob an Email (b...@myserver.com) CC
(b...@3rdserver.com) I run myserver.com. message goes through to
b...@3rdserver.com, but not b...@myserver.com.
there is absolutely no trace of alice's domain in the mail logs.
Do you have "smtpd_delay_reject = yes
Sorry, I should have filled in all this information before hand :(
Server is live and fully functional. it deals with thousands of messages
per day and has for over a year. One user can't receive messages from one
contact. That contact doesn't even show up in the logs as spam or lost
connection
On 4-Mar-2009, at 20:29, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Add "-v" to the cleanup(8) service to see where the change was made.
cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup -v
that REALLY broke things.
Lots of stuff, ending with:
Mar 4 20:58:22 mail postfix/cleanup[55873]: cleanup
On 4-Mar-2009, at 20:29, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:17:27PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep
john | awk
'{prin
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:49:57 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
> >> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
> >>
> >> Ray wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:10:22 Bill Weiss wrote:
> Ray(r...@stilltech.net)@Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:46:21PM -0700:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > > On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > > > Ray
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:17:27PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
>>> $ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep john | awk
>>> '{print $7" "$8}'
>>> to=, orig_to=,
>>> to=, orig
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep john
| awk
'{print $7" "$8}'
to=, orig_to=,
to=, orig_to=,
hiding the full logging for the message in question is not helpful
LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 09:25 PM:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:12, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:24 PM:
>>> On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
>>>
>>> Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it sho
J.P. Trosclair wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:01 PM:
> I'll research the smtpd_tls_security_level option further. It didn't
> present a problem until I started working on this specific feature with
> the white lists. I have created another smtpd instance to forward white
> listed domains to rather than t
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> $ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep john | awk
> '{print $7" "$8}'
> to=, orig_to=,
> to=, orig_to=,
hiding the full logging for the message in question is not helpful. Do
ditch the awk script and report all oth
On 4-Mar-2009, at 17:13, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:07:44PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
If j...@example.com is not in /etc/postfix/virtual, where else
could this
be controlled?
See above. Consider also that the rewrite could be based on a partial
match of either the domain o
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:12, Jorey Bump wrote:
LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:24 PM:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it
shouldn't.
The context is irrelevant.
Of course the
LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:24 PM:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
>
> Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it shouldn't.
The context is irrelevant. smtpd_tls_security_level is the new parameter
that replace
Ray(r...@stilltech.net)@Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:46:21PM -0700:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > > Ray wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I'm having an issue with mail
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
>> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
>>
>> Ray wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
>> > > Ray wrote:
>> > > > Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob a
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:11:02PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:28, mouss wrote:
>> LuKreme a ?crit :
>>> What controls escaping "From " in the body of a mail message if it's at
>>> the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir, it
>>> seems silly to do this any
/dev/rob0 wrote:
Please don't top-post. Thank you.
On Wed March 4 2009 17:10:49 Jim McIver wrote:
Guess I'm confused. I have a relay_recipient and recipient_access
files listing only valid user's email addresses for my company.
ie..
relay_recipients
bg...@lmtribune.com any_value
bi...@
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:07:44PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> when you have "to=, orig_to=" in the
> maillog file, that translation is handled by /etc/postfix/virtual, isn't
> it?
No, by any mechanism that rewrites the envelope recipient in cleanup(8):
recipient_canonical_maps
canonical_m
On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:18, Robert A. Ober wrote:
Thanks to Brian and others for hanging in there with me!
I think you owe everyone on this thread (which I was not part of, so
no self-interest) a beer. :)
--
#27794 ... I wonder if the really nerdy Klingons learn how
to speak english
At 04:07 PM 3/4/2009, you wrote:
when you have "to=, orig_to=" in
the maillog file, that translation is handled by /etc/postfix/virtual,
isn't it?
If j...@example.com is not in /etc/postfix/virtual, where else could
this be controlled?
I did grep -ir jo...@example.com /etc/postfix/ and got 0 hi
On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:28, mouss wrote:
LuKreme a écrit :
What controls escaping "From " in the body of a mail message if
it's at
the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir, it
seems silly to do this anymore, but I can't find the setting. In
fact,
I'm not even sure it'
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Pawel Lesniak
Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2009 7:32 PM
To: postfix users list
Subject: Re: Spam attacks
W dniu 2009-03-03 23:34, MacShane, Tracy pisze:
when you have "to=, orig_to=" in
the maillog file, that translation is handled by /etc/postfix/virtual,
isn't it?
If j...@example.com is not in /etc/postfix/virtual, where else could
this be controlled?
I did grep -ir jo...@example.com /etc/postfix/ and got 0 hits, so it's
not in virtua
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > Ray wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was
> > > > hoping that someone here would g
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
>
> Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > Ray wrote:
> > > > Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob an Email (b...@myserver.com) CC
> > > > (b...@3rdserver.co
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:25 CET,
"Daniel L. Miller" wrote:
> What I have/had now was the following:
> master.cf:
> 192.168.0.11:smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o relayhost=[192.168.0.10]:225
> 192.168.0.11:125 inet n - - -
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:22 CET,
"Daniel L. Miller" wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > Define content_filter in main.cf pointing to the spam processing
> > machine, define a new smtpd listener in master.cf listening on a
> > different port.
> > http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.htm
On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > Ray wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was
> > > hoping that someone here would give me an idea on where to get
> > > started.
> > >
> > > here's
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > Ray wrote:
> >
> > > Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob an Email (b...@myserver.com) CC
> > > (b...@3rdserver.com) I run myserver.com. message goes through to
> > > b...@3rdser
Please don't top-post. Thank you.
On Wed March 4 2009 17:10:49 Jim McIver wrote:
> Guess I'm confused. I have a relay_recipient and recipient_access
> files listing only valid user's email addresses for my company.
> ie..
> relay_recipients
> bg...@lmtribune.com any_value
> bi...@lmtribune.com
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> Ray wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was hoping
> > that someone here would give me an idea on where to get started.
> >
> > here's the situation. (Made up names)
> >
> > server is postfix wit
mouss wrote:
to setup a Postfix listener for local SMTP connections, which will then
forward to a relayhost for spam processing (in this case, primarily
auto-whitelisting). That relayhost will then send the message back to
Postfix on another connection, and THAT listener will not have a
relayhos
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:22 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: restricting who can be sent to.
>
> Carver Banks wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I
Thanks for your feedback. I do have $myhostname defined and you've
confirmed what I thought. It's their issue and they need to fix it.
Again, thanks.
-- Rob
On 3/4/09 12:19 PM, "LuKreme" wrote:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 12:33, Rob Tanner wrote:
>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: Spa
Noel Jones wrote:
Define content_filter in main.cf pointing to the spam processing
machine, define a new smtpd listener in master.cf listening on a
different port.
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
Amavisd-new is software often used as a postfix content_filter. Even
if you're using s
Ray wrote:
Hello,
I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was hoping that
someone here would give me an idea on where to get started.
here's the situation. (Made up names)
server is postfix with amavis-new, spam-assassin and dovecot. logs are fairly
verbose.
Alice (al..
Noel,
Guess I'm confused. I have a relay_recipient and recipient_access files
listing only valid user's email addresses for my company.
ie..
relay_recipients
bg...@lmtribune.com any_value
bi...@lmtribune.com any_value
bjohn...@lmtribune.com any_value
recipient_access
bg...@lmtribune.co
Hello,
I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was hoping that
someone here would give me an idea on where to get started.
here's the situation. (Made up names)
server is postfix with amavis-new, spam-assassin and dovecot. logs are fairly
verbose.
Alice (al...@example.com)
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Ok - now that I've fixed my idiotic routing errors (don't have two NIC's
on the same network unless you know what you're doing - which I clearly
don't!), I can get back to Postfix.
From my prior configuration questions in ages past, I have been trying
to make most of
Santiago Romero:
> Wietse Venema escribi?:
> > Santiago Romero:
> >
> >> I case it happens again ... Where or what should I take a look? At OS
> >> level (disk or network I/O, processes...) I didn't see anything before
> >> the "postfix restart"...
> >>
> >
> > Try ``strace -o filename
Daniel L. Miller a écrit :
> Ok - now that I've fixed my idiotic routing errors (don't have two NIC's
> on the same network unless you know what you're doing - which I clearly
> don't!), I can get back to Postfix.
>
> From my prior configuration questions in ages past, I have been trying
> to make
Jim McIver wrote:
In looking at the file in xxx/deferred, my mailserver is trying to
return an undelivable message and it looks like there is something wrong
with the site. " said: 557 Invalid routingNCrequest - domain in
BLACK LIST."
Basically I think the site is a spammer and they are bla
LuKreme a écrit :
> What controls escaping "From " in the body of a mail message if it's at
> the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir, it
> seems silly to do this anymore, but I can't find the setting. In fact,
> I'm not even sure it's in postfix at all.
look at what you
On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it shouldn't.
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:21, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
*encrypt*
Mandatory TLS encryption: announce STARTTLS support to
Carver Banks wrote:
Hello,
I am in the process of setting up an internal mail server
(carver-test.mydomain.local) using postfix, dovecot and squirrel mail.
I want the users of this system only be able send mail to a few users in
mydomain.com
I imagine that there is an easy way to map this to a
In looking at the file in xxx/deferred, my mailserver is trying to
return an undelivable message and it looks like there is something wrong
with the site. " said: 557 Invalid routingNCrequest - domain in
BLACK LIST."
Basically I think the site is a spammer and they are blacklisted. How
can
On 3/4/2009 1:57 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I need to change email sent by a user from one domain (a.com) so that
clicking Reply will reply to him at b.com. (a.com isn't always reliable,
and I admin b.com, among other reasons.)
Google got me to postfix.org's documentation on generic maps. I'm
r
My mistake. The u...@domain.com is in the maillog. yahoo.co.jp is in
postqueue -p
-jm
Paweł Leśniak wrote:
W dniu 2009-03-04 21:32, Jim McIver pisze:
I have Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and am having trouble blocking
email from a domain.
Here is a snipet of the postqueue -p:
DF6A927D 3
My mistake, the ones piling up in postqueue -p are the yahoo.co.jp. The
u...@domain.com is just listed in the maillog and it's a bogus email
address I'd like not to receive email from.
-jm
LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:32, Jim McIver wrote:
they just pile up in the postqueue and I'd like
Jorey Bump wrote:
Put it back. smtpd_enforce_tls is deprecated since Postfix 2.3 and
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
I'll research the smtpd_tls_security_level option further. It didn't
present a problem until I started working on this specific feature with
the white lists.
Paweł Leśniak a écrit :
> W dniu 2009-03-03 18:41, Noel Jones pisze:
>> Some legit "reminder" type services, some meeting notifications, and
>> other legit mail might arrive with you as the sender. Maybe not best
>> practices, but it's legit mail and such a policy will reject it.
> Why would someo
Hello,
I am in the process of setting up an internal mail server
(carver-test.mydomain.local) using postfix, dovecot and squirrel mail.
I want the users of this system only be able send mail to a few users in
mydomain.com
I imagine that there is an easy way to map this to a file, but I can't seem
Ok - now that I've fixed my idiotic routing errors (don't have two NIC's
on the same network unless you know what you're doing - which I clearly
don't!), I can get back to Postfix.
From my prior configuration questions in ages past, I have been trying
to make most of my changes in master.cf, s
J.P. Trosclair wrote, at 03/04/2009 04:05 PM:
> LuKreme wrote:
>> On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:08, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
>>> submission inet n - - - - smtpd
>>> -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
>>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>
> I didn't explicitly add it. It was a left over from the d
Paweł Leśniak wrote:
W dniu 2009-03-04 21:32, Jim McIver pisze:
I have Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and am having trouble blocking
email from a domain.
Here is a snipet of the postqueue -p:
DF6A927D 3512 Tue Mar 3 18:42:35 MAILER-DAEMON
(connect to mx1.mail.yahoo.co.jp[124.83.183.240]:
LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:08, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
Why?
I didn't explicitly add it. It was a left over from the default
master.cf for the postfix package on debian 5.0. It's gone
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:32, Jim McIver wrote:
they just pile up in the postqueue and I'd like to keep the
postqueue -p cleaned out.
Snippet from maillog:
Mar 4 00:09:21 mail postfix/smtpd[36633]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[89.218.164.251]: 554 : Sender address
rejected: Access denie
W dniu 2009-03-04 21:32, Jim McIver pisze:
I have Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and am having trouble blocking
email from a domain.
Here is a snipet of the postqueue -p:
DF6A927D 3512 Tue Mar 3 18:42:35 MAILER-DAEMON
(connect to mx1.mail.yahoo.co.jp[124.83.183.240]: server dropped
conne
Jim McIver wrote:
> I have Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and am having trouble blocking
> email from a domain.
>
Postfix 2.1 is ancient. Recommend an upgrade as some things I mention
may require 2.2 or 2.3 or higher.
> Here is a snipet of the postqueue -p:
>
> DF6A927D 3512 Tue Mar 3 18:42:3
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:08, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
Why?
--
If I were you boys, I wouldn't talk or even think about women.
T'aint good for your health.
Carlos Williams wrote:
Thanks for that info. Can someone also comment on this? I asked a
friend via email and this was his response to the same issue:
**
"I used nslookup to verify the address your queue is showing, and it
does correspond to je.jfcom.mil. But a reque
I have Postfix 2.1 on Freebsd 4.10 and am having trouble blocking email
from a domain.
Here is a snipet of the postqueue -p:
DF6A927D 3512 Tue Mar 3 18:42:35 MAILER-DAEMON
(connect to mx1.mail.yahoo.co.jp[124.83.183.240]: server dropped
connection without sending the initial SMTP greet
Pawe?? Le??niak:
> W dniu 2009-03-04 20:53, Charles Marcus pisze:
> > Irrelevant. There is nothing wrong with simplifying things...
> >
> Simplifying does not mean changing behavior. As Wietse said, postconf -n
> shows only setting from main.cf. So adding values from outside main.cf
> is not
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a white list with check_sender_access in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. The problem I'm running into is that the
> submission port is requiring TLS even when I have set
> smtpd_enforce_tls=no and smtp_enfoce_tls=no in main.cf and specified
> them as
On 4-Mar-2009, at 12:33, Rob Tanner wrote:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on
microthunder.com
They really *really* need to update their two-year old SA install.
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.4 required=4.0
They really *REALLY* n
On 3/4/2009, PaweB Le[niak (warl...@lesniakowie.com) wrote:
Looking at first email in thread carefully you'd see that Dave has
(or had) problem with spam sent from j...@foo.com to j...@foo.com. And
that's the case where authentication will do the job perfectly - IMHO
way better then zen.
Steve Crawford wrote:
While we do not manage a "mailing list" in the traditional sense, we do
send a lot of emails (daily/weekly/monthly reports, instant-alert
messages, etc.) where using VERP to track bounces could prove useful.
We run numerous projects with varying requirements and the messa
W dniu 2009-03-04 20:53, Charles Marcus pisze:
Irrelevant. There is nothing wrong with simplifying things...
Simplifying does not mean changing behavior. As Wietse said, postconf -n
shows only setting from main.cf. So adding values from outside main.cf
is not simplifying at all.
By your ar
I'm trying to implement a white list with check_sender_access in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions. The problem I'm running into is that the
submission port is requiring TLS even when I have set
smtpd_enforce_tls=no and smtp_enfoce_tls=no in main.cf and specified
them as options for the submission e
Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Robert A. Ober wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
>>>
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>
>>
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
What controls escaping "From " in the body of a mail message if it's
at the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir,
it seems silly to do this anymore, but I can't find the setting. In
fact, I'm not even sure it's in postfix at all.
RTFM replies preferred, just say wi
On 3/4/2009 2:36 PM, Paweł Leśniak wrote:
>> I was just talking about something that would make it easier when
>> someone was asking for help on the list... I don't think the above will
>> quite accomplish that...
> In many cases (I'm not gonna do statistics) new users do not post their
> question
Rob Tanner wrote:
Hi,
We are having problems sending email to a particular site on the
internet that uses SpamAssassin to filter for spam. They send me back
the headers on a particular message and here is the spam portion:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (
On 3/4/2009, PaweB Le[niak (warl...@lesniakowie.com) wrote:
> Looking at first email in thread carefully you'd see that Dave has
> (or had) problem with spam sent from j...@foo.com to j...@foo.com. And
> that's the case where authentication will do the job perfectly - IMHO
> way better then zen.
On 3/4/2009 10:05 AM, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:35:38AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matem?tica wrote:
The user was not "relaying": mail was sent to a domain you are
responsible
for, so this was not blocked by "re
I was just talking about something that would make it easier when
someone was asking for help on the list... I don't think the above will
quite accomplish that...
In many cases (I'm not gonna do statistics) new users do not post their
questions correctly - often we can see 2nd message in th
Hi,
We are having problems sending email to a particular site on the internet
that uses SpamAssassin to filter for spam. They send me back the headers on
a particular message and here is the spam portion:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on
microthun
Emmanuel Seyman wrote, at 03/04/2009 02:03 PM:
> What's the best way to do this? If I install SA on the first domain
> and remove the lists.example.org MX, spammers will still be able to
> send spam to it directly. Is setting up SA on both machines the simplest
> way to go?
It's certainly more fl
On Wed March 4 2009 08:48:18 Paweł Leśniak wrote:
But then we come to definition of spam. It's in simple words unwanted
message.
Too simple, and not correct. The true definition of spam is UBE:
unsolicited bulk email. Most spammers put out messages that a tiny
percentage of recipient
On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
Right and that means the type is C
On 4-Mar-2009, at 11:54, Wietse Venema wrote:
"postconf -n" does not list parameters unless they are set in
main.cf. The simplicity of the tool makes it useful for building
into other tools. If we start making random exceptions then we get
on a slippery slope (why stop with mail_version? why not
Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
>> On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
> Right and that means the type is Cyrus?
>
> Robert
You seem to have had Cyrus working, but want to break it to try to us
Hey, all.
I've been asked to overhaul a postfix configuration and I would really
appreciate any tips or advice that people may have on the subject.
I'm working on two servers :
The first one receives mail for @example.org . The configuration isn't
easy to read (hence the overhaul) but it looks
LuKreme:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 09:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Charles Marcus:
> >> Dovecot has added two lines of text to the beginning output of
> >> dovecot
> >> -n that could possibly save some time with troubleshooting...
> >>
> >> It adds the version on the first line, and OS/platform info on
On Wed March 4 2009 08:39:37 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> If I recall correctly the OP reported using Postfix 2.2 and should
> see:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sasl_type
>
> attempts to use Dovecot SASL auth with Postfix 2.2 are unlikely to
> get very far.
I did it, but I chea
Noel Jones:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Charles Marcus:
> >> Dovecot has added two lines of text to the beginning output of dovecot
> >> -n that could possibly save some time with troubleshooting...
> >>
> >> It adds the version on the first line, and OS/platform info on the
> >> second line, like s
At 12:52 PM 3/4/2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> # 1.1.11: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
>> # OS: Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r9 x86_64 Gentoo Base System release 1.12.11.1
If the output is name =value then could the output just be
conf = 1.1.11: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
OS = Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r9 x86_64 G
On Wed March 4 2009 08:48:18 Paweł Leśniak wrote:
> But then we come to definition of spam. It's in simple words unwanted
> message.
Too simple, and not correct. The true definition of spam is UBE:
unsolicited bulk email. Most spammers put out messages that a tiny
percentage of recipients want t
Victor Duchovni:
> > slow_destination_recipient_limit=1
> > slow_destination_concurrency_limit=1
I wonder if the problem recurs when these are changed. But let's
first swap new and old queue managers.
Wietse
ok thanks wietse!
Evelio Vila:
> so I would like to modify the return_attribute to pass postfix only
the user
> part of the mail field.
See: man ldap_table | less +/result_format
> Also, could several queries can be combined to form the desired
result?
You can't make multiple queries per resu
Wietse Venema wrote:
Charles Marcus:
Dovecot has added two lines of text to the beginning output of dovecot
-n that could possibly save some time with troubleshooting...
It adds the version on the first line, and OS/platform info on the
second line, like so:
# 1.1.11: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote
vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd :
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote
vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd :
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
There is some issue with Mandriva 2009.0
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
