On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:45:53PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jan P. Kessler:
> > Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> > > The topmost header "by your-MTA" is trustworthy, as are any headers
> > > above it.
> > >
> >
> > That makes sense, of course.
> >
> > Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_rec
Jan P. Kessler:
> Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> > The topmost header "by your-MTA" is trustworthy, as are any headers
> > above it.
> >
>
> That makes sense, of course.
>
> Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not include
> the ccert_fingerprint when available?
Perhaps it
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
The topmost header "by your-MTA" is trustworthy, as are any headers
above it.
That makes sense, of course.
Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not include
the ccert_fingerprint when available?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:28:40PM +0100, Dario Cavallaro wrote:
> just to be sure anyone want's to strip routes away knows what he/she is doing:
>
> From: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
>
> "If source routes are stripped, this practice will cause failures."
>
> Don't strip routes/paths 't
Erick Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have a postfix 2.3.3 system being used for redirection purposes
> during a migration from sendmail to postfix.
> let call this system postfix1 (192.168.10.10) , the new postfix system
> is postfix2 (192.168.10.20) and the old system is sendmail1
> (19
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Perez
> Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2008 9:39 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: suggestions with transport and virtual
>
> And correctly delivers the emails to both servers. This i
Hi, I have a postfix 2.3.3 system being used for redirection purposes
during a migration from sendmail to postfix.
let call this system postfix1 (192.168.10.10) , the new postfix system
is postfix2 (192.168.10.20) and the old system is sendmail1
(192.168.10.30)
I am using a combination of /etc/pos
Dario Cavallaro a écrit :
> Hi all,
> just to be sure anyone want's to strip routes away knows what he/she is doing:
>
> From: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
>
> "If source routes are stripped, this practice will cause failures."
>
> Don't strip routes/paths 'til you are working on internet
Hi all,
just to be sure anyone want's to strip routes away knows what he/she is doing:
From: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
"If source routes are stripped, this practice will cause failures."
Don't strip routes/paths 'til you are working on internet. It is
dangerous and it's not rfc-complia
Hello,
In order to update the quota file "maildirsize" in mailbox' users, I
need to do :
maildirmake -q {quota}S /home/vmail/domain/user1 && chown vmail.vmail
/home/vmail/domain/user1/maildirsize
Is it possible to do this with a unix pipe in virtual delivery ?
How to do this in master.cf
Sturgis, Grant a écrit :
> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 11:44 -0700, Duane Hill wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sturgis, Grant:
> I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
headers of
>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:58:25PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> The space just before the final "/" should not be there. Postfix added
> Received headers (for network-originated traffic) match (PCRE):
>
> /^Received:
> [ ] from [ ] \S+# Helo name
> [ ] \(\S+ [ ]
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 11:44 -0700, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> Sturgis, Grant:
> >>> I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
> >> headers of
> >>> outbound email. I've done
Jan P. Kessler a écrit :
> Victor Duchovni schrieb:
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
>>
>>
>>> would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
>>> attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp
>>> session? Background is the current
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 08:48:31PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> >On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> >
> >
> >>would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
> >>attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp session?
Background is the current development of a content/proxyfilter.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:16:59AM -0700, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Sturgis, Grant:
> > > I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
> > headers of
> > > outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have f
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sturgis, Grant:
I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
headers of
outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found
two
solutions:
...
2. Use header_
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sturgis, Grant:
> > I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
> headers of
> > outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found
> two
> > solutions:
> ...
> > 2. Use header_checks like this
> > http://
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
> attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp session?
> Background is the current development of a content/proxyfilter.
What problem would this so
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:15:05AM -0800, LaGatorVII wrote:
>
> Ok here is the problem. My postfix server is the front end for 2 exchange
> servers running Symantec Mail Security with spam filtering. The most
> important thing is to cut down the spam as much as possible. We go to great
> pains to
Dear postfix developers,
would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp session?
Background is the current development of a content/proxyfilter.
Cheers, Jan
Am Wednesday 26 November 2008 18:15:05 schrieb LaGatorVII:
>
> ...
> I see two possible solutions, both of which I am not savvy enough to do on
> my own:
>
> 1) Some setting or filter in Postfix to not generate a bounce message when
> an email is rejected for the above reason.
And what about a me
Ok here is the problem. My postfix server is the front end for 2 exchange
servers running Symantec Mail Security with spam filtering. The most
important thing is to cut down the spam as much as possible. We go to great
pains to maintain a proper list of recipients so we don't have "User
Unknown" b
Hello,
Thank you Jan, thanks for your suggestion!
Regards,
Muhammed Sameer
--- On Wed, 11/26/08, Jan P. Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jan P. Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Customized Postfix Check
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wednesday, Novem
Hello,
Thanks for your time and suggestion will sure try that out.
Regards,
Muhammed Sameer
--- On Wed, 11/26/08, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Customized Postfix Check
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: "Postfix users"
> Date: Wednesday, November
ram:
>
> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 09:21 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > ram:
> > > Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
> > > The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
> > > servers
> > >
> > > I can easily configure multiple IP addresses
Le 25 nov. 08 à 05:42, ram a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 13:04 +0100, bsd wrote:
Hello folks,
I am actually working for an African country where the electricity is
not as stable as one could expect - even in the infrastructure of the
historical telco operator…
With all the care that we h
Muhammed Sameer schrieb:
> Salaam,
>
> Hello everyone, Can I write a postfix check myself?
>
> Actually, I want postfix to check for the quota and status of the user in a
> database, and if the user is overquota or if the status of the user is
> suspended, I want postfix to accordingly bounce the
Muhammed Sameer a écrit :
> Salaam,
>
> Hello everyone, Can I write a postfix check myself?
>
> Actually, I want postfix to check for the quota and status of the user in a
> database, and if the user is overquota or if the status of the user is
> suspended, I want postfix to accordingly bounce
Rajkumar S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I suspend postfix delivering mails to external domains
> temporary? Postfix must accept mails to other destinations but not
> deliver them till it's told to.
>
See http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#defer_transports
Brian
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 09:21 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> > Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
> > The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
> > servers
> >
> > I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
>
Salaam,
Hello everyone, Can I write a postfix check myself?
Actually, I want postfix to check for the quota and status of the user in a
database, and if the user is overquota or if the status of the user is
suspended, I want postfix to accordingly bounce the message with the
appropriate bounce
Barney Desmond:
> This is what we thought *should* work, but apparently it doesn't. I'd
> love to be told that it actually works.
>
> 1. Add an extra smtp service to master.cf:
>
> smtphotmailinet n - - - - smtpd
> -o smtp_bind_address=1.1.1.2
>
> 2. Add a
bijayant kumar wrote:
> One thing more that the manpage of addresses(5) says
> Do not use ASCII control characters. Avoid spaces and the
> characters\"<>()[],;:
> I want to ask that are they all be treated as Non-Ascii
> characters or any thing else? If you could clarify the
> same it will be
ram wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 23:39 +1100, Barney Desmond wrote:
>> You'd think you could create extra smtp-service instances in master.cf
>> and bind them to different addresses with -o smtp_bind_address=a.b.c.d,
>> then use transport maps to fiddle with them, but this apparently doesn't
>> w
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 23:39 +1100, Barney Desmond wrote:
> ram wrote:
> > Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
> > The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
> > servers
> >
> > I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. C
37 matches
Mail list logo
