Ville Walveranta wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Postfix uses the names that YOU specify. It does not
magically rename things.
From the MASTER(5):
" The service name is specified as host:port,
" denoting the host and port on which new con-
" ne
--
From: "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 3:36 AM
To:
Subject: tunnel with SSH?
I was creating an SSL tunnel with SSH for pop3 and smtp but I decided to
use pop3s.
The problem is that my client IP is not on the same ne
I was creating an SSL tunnel with SSH for pop3 and smtp but I decided to
use pop3s.
The problem is that my client IP is not on the same network as my smtp
server so I get a relaying denied for any no domain recipient.
I'm starting to think the SSH tunnel was a good idea (since my client IP
is dynam
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Postfix uses the names that YOU specify. It does not
> magically rename things.
>From the MASTER(5):
" The service name is specified as host:port,
" denoting the host and port on which new con-
" nections should be acce
Ville Walveranta:
> Many thanks! That should get me going.
>
> If I disable the default in master.cf, does
> the first interface-specific smtpd become "smtpd" without a suffix or
> does it remain enumerated since it's not generic? I'll find that out
Postfix uses the names that YOU specify. It doe
Many thanks! That should get me going.
The interfaces are apparently numbered ("smtpd1", "smtpd2") in main.cf
in the order they appeared in master.cf while the "smtpd" remains the
default (unless disabled). If I disable the default in master.cf, does
the first interface-specific smtpd become "smtp
Ville Walveranta:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:29 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can create multiple smtpd's in master.cf (but comment out the "default"
> > one or use inte_interfaces to limit it)
> >
> > 192.168.1.1 ... smtpd
> >-o smtpd_client_restrictions=${smtpd1_clien
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:29 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can create multiple smtpd's in master.cf (but comment out the "default"
> one or use inte_interfaces to limit it)
>
> 192.168.1.1 ... smtpd
>-o smtpd_client_restrictions=${smtpd1_client_restrictions}
>-o sm
Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
If a spammer can successfully send enough spam to system aliases, then they can
effectively cause a system wide denial of service for email and other logging
function as /var would be at capacity. So spammers do have a lot to gain by
spamming those mail boxes which
* "Daniel V. Reinhardt":
> Stefan Förster:
>> I think that most of the poeple out there sending UBE/UCE want to
>> make money, but the folks reading postmaster@ and abuse@ are in
>> general not the ones who buy anything from spammers or get easily
>> fooled by some Nigerian scam. From a spammers po
>
> * Neil wrote:
> > On 8 Nov 2008, at 03:46, Stefan Förster wrote:
> >> This has never been a problem for me because the amount of junk email
> >> sent to postmaster and abuse is absolutely negligible. I don't want to
> >> know what happens, though, if that address was used every day...
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Förster さんは書きました:
|
| I think that most of the poeple out there sending UBE/UCE want to make
| money, but the folks reading postmaster@ and abuse@ are in general not
| the ones who buy anything from spammers or get easily fooled by some
| Niger
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Martin Strand schrieb:
We're an email service provider hosting ~3000 domains. Customers can delegate
their domains to our nameservers and administer email accounts with a web
interface.
I figured it would be a good idea to reserve the postmaster@ and abuse@
addresses
Martin Strand schrieb:
> We're an email service provider hosting ~3000 domains. Customers can delegate
> their domains to our nameservers and administer email accounts with a web
> interface.
>
> I figured it would be a good idea to reserve the postmaster@ and abuse@
> addresses for hosted doma
Jan P. Kessler schrieb:
Tom Diehl schrieb:
Hi,
I have a machine running postfix-2.3.2 that processes mail for about
100 virtual
domains. One of my customers wants to try using one of those
anti-spam services
that filters mail before it gets to our box. The problem is that I
know spammy
will
Tom Diehl schrieb:
Hi,
I have a machine running postfix-2.3.2 that processes mail for about
100 virtual
domains. One of my customers wants to try using one of those anti-spam
services
that filters mail before it gets to our box. The problem is that I
know spammy
will ignore the MX and try to
If someone gets a moment-- he/she should add gross to the postfix policy
page: http://www.postfix.org/addon.html
Homepage URL:
http://code.google.com/p/gross/
From page description:
* it's blazingly fast
* it's amazingly resource efficient
* it can be configured to query DNSBL dat
* Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8 Nov 2008, at 03:46, Stefan Förster wrote:
>> This has never been a problem for me because the amount of junk email
>> sent to postmaster and abuse is absolutely negligible. I don't want to
>> know what happens, though, if that address was used every day...
>
On 8 Nov 2008, at 03:46, Stefan Förster wrote:
This has never been a problem for me because the amount of junk email
sent to postmaster and abuse is absolutely negligible. I don't want to
know what happens, though, if that address was used every day...
I've noticed the same in the past, and it
Hi,
I have a machine running postfix-2.3.2 that processes mail for about 100 virtual
domains. One of my customers wants to try using one of those anti-spam services
that filters mail before it gets to our box. The problem is that I know spammy
will ignore the MX and try to deliver directly to our
Martin Strand wrote:
Our customers are extremely non-technical (some believe the Internet is "that blue
'e' on the computer") so I have little hope in explaining why postmaster is a
reserved mailbox. :)
This particular customer registered his domain somewhere else and now decided
to switch to
Hi all,
I'm trying to relay the mails for a user that are in a local domain to an
external relay host, so I want that the email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be
relayed.
postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory
Nasser Heidari wrote:
Dear Folks,
I need a custom SMTP authentication solution.
There is a database that contains about 5000 user authentication data.
Now we want to provide SMTP service for these users with same credentials.
I know I can create a view-only user in database server and
connect to
Ville Walveranta wrote:
Hello everybody!
My "Qmail to Postfix transition project" has been on ice for couple of
months due to other priorities, but now I need to finish it. One of
the things I'm working on is to see if I could limit an interface to
specific domains and to accept unauthenticated
Hello everybody!
My "Qmail to Postfix transition project" has been on ice for couple of
months due to other priorities, but now I need to finish it. One of
the things I'm working on is to see if I could limit an interface to
specific domains and to accept unauthenticated connections only from
spec
Dear Folks,
I need a custom SMTP authentication solution.
There is a database that contains about 5000 user authentication data.
Now we want to provide SMTP service for these users with same credentials.
I know I can create a view-only user in database server and
connect to it via SASL - MYSQL and
* Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now one of these customers wants to create a
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] account and use it for his personal
> email... I just want to ask what you guys think about this policy,
> am I just being silly when reserving these addresses in the
> customer's own doma
27 matches
Mail list logo
