Hi All.
I have observed some strange behavior when using VRFY against my Postfix
relays.
I use GLD greylisting called as a policy service:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
pcre:/etc/postfix/recip_access,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks,
c
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Sometimes I get this message in my daily overview:
[snip]
Removing stale entries from sendmail host status cache:
mailwrapper: no mapping in /etc/mail/mailer.conf
[snip]
/etc/mail/mailer.conf:
sendmail/usr/local/sbin/sendmail
send-mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:34:11AM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Noel Jones wrote:
>>> This should have all the information you need:
>>> http://www.postfix.org/TLS_R
On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 at 18:43 CET,
Jos Chrispijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sometimes I get this message in my daily overview:
>
> [snip]
>
> Removing stale entries from sendmail host status cache:
> mailwrapper: no mapping in /etc/mail/mailer.conf
>
> [snip]
>
> /etc/mail/maile
Dear Guys,
I am having a postfix+ldap+jamm debian server having more than 15 mail
accounts and so now, Jamm is not able to load all the mail accounts together
and not able to reset a mail account password due to this. Please let me
know is there any alternative to Jamm, i am not able to see a
Francis SOUYRI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I say "very idle" because I have 30/70% cpu idle and 10/30% cpu wait.
If you really have the CPU in wait 10% - 30%, then that's very likely
your problem. Is there something other than postfix running on this
box that is putting demand on the disk?
> -
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:12:34PM +0100, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> >Is syslog configured to not log each line synchronously??? On Linux systems
> >with syslogd make sure that the log file has "-/var/log/maillog" not
> >"/var/log/maillog". Otherwise syslog can't keep up and the queue manager
> >is b
Hi,
>
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] de la part de Victor Duchovni [EMAIL
>PROTECTED]
>Date d'envoi : mardi 28 octobre 2008 20:40
>À : postfix-users@postfix.org
>Objet : Re: RE : Big incoming queue, slow qmgr, idle system.
>
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2008
Hi,
>
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] de la part de Victor Duchovni [EMAIL
>PROTECTED]
>Date d'envoi : mardi 28 octobre 2008 20:27
>À : postfix-users@postfix.org
>Objet : Re: RE : Big incoming queue, slow qmgr, idle system.
>
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2008
Francis SOUYRI:
> Hello Wietse,
>
> For this day 15 times, all are postfix restarts, after parameters
> changes to see what appended (activate/deactivate qmgr verbose)
> or when there is too many mails in the incoming (to reduce the
> smtpd from 100 to 40 in the master.cf)
TURN OFF ALL VERBOSE LO
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:17:15PM +0100, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello Ofer,
>
> I say "very idle" because I have 30/70% cpu idle and 10/30% cpu wait.
>
> Sorry I checked...
>
> - Get a faster disk
>
> I have 2x36Go U320 15000rpm mirrored with md, 2x73Go U320 15000rpm mirrored
> with md, and
Hello Wietse,
For this day 15 times, all are postfix restarts, after parameters changes to
see what appended (activate/deactivate qmgr verbose) or when there is too many
mails in the incoming (to reduce the smtpd from 100 to 40 in the master.cf)
Oct 28 11:18:42 vador postfix/qmgr[11389]: dict_e
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:50:51PM +0100, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> >> Time to time we have lot of mail in the incoming queue, "no" mail in the
> >> active queue, the "qmgr "is very" slow and the server is very idle. We
> >> tested the antispam/virus to see if there is a problem but the response
> >
Francis SOUYRI:
> qshape incoming
>
> T5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640
> 1280 1280+
> TOTAL 3201 2121 937 87 11 21 23 0 0
> 0 0
This is typical for what happens after the qmgr is restarted (with
"postfix reload" or ot
Hello Viktor
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] de la part de Victor Duchovni [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Date d'envoi : mardi 28 octobre 2008 17:59
Cc : postfix-users@postfix.org
Objet : Re: Big incoming queue, slow qmgr, idle system.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at
Hello Ofer,
I say "very idle" because I have 30/70% cpu idle and 10/30% cpu wait.
Sorry I checked...
- Get a faster disk
I have 2x36Go U320 15000rpm mirrored with md, 2x73Go U320 15000rpm mirrored
with md, and 4g0 memory (cache).
- Put your postfix queues on a separate disk from other stuff
Sometimes I get this message in my daily overview:
[snip]
Removing stale entries from sendmail host status cache:
mailwrapper: no mapping in /etc/mail/mailer.conf
[snip]
/etc/mail/mailer.conf:
sendmail/usr/local/sbin/sendmail
send-mail /usr/local/sbin/sendmail
mailq /u
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 05:26:32PM +0100, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello,
>
>We have a bi Xeon 3.2Ghz 4Go memory Redhat EL4 server as a relay
> connected to Internet. On that server we have an advanced filter
> injecting mail back into postfix 2.5.4 for the anti spam/virus (Sophos
> Puremes
Francis SOUYRI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time to time we have lot of mail in the incoming queue, "no" mail in the
> active queue, the "qmgr "is very" slow and the server is very idle. We
> tested the antispam/virus to see if there is a problem but the response
> is very good.
When you say "v
Hello,
We have a bi Xeon 3.2Ghz 4Go memory Redhat EL4 server as a relay
connected to Internet. On that server we have an advanced filter
injecting mail back into postfix 2.5.4 for the anti spam/virus (Sophos
Puremessage).
Time to time we have lot of mail in the incoming queue, "no" mail i
2008/10/28 Kyle Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It is unlikely that there will be a second edition of _Postfix: The
> Definitive Guide_. O'Reilly has said that they are less and less interested
> in doing sysadmin-type books because people tend to get that information
> online, and it's difficult to ke
> It is unlikely that there will be a second edition of _Postfix: The
> Definitive Guide_. O'Reilly has said that they are less and less
> interested in doing sysadmin-type books because people tend to get that
> information online, and it's difficult to keep the material current in a
> boo
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:50:07PM +, kj wrote:
James Brown wrote:
I second "The Book of Postfix: State-of-the-art Message Transport"!
Another is "Postfix: The Definitive Guide" by Kyle Dent, published by
O'Reilly.
Third! Awesome book!
Speaking of which, any wor
Thanks all for your help, it works now.
Reinaldo de Carvalho a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thanks for your reactivity but the recipient field are all addressed to
>> proxy.foo.com and I've to discriminate by user account to redirect mail.
>>
>> I find transport table by the link you've given to me an
Just a follow-up that I did end up fixing the Maildrop issue, mainly
due to this article I found:
http://www.marlow.dk/site.php/tech/postfix
Thanks also to mouss for suggesting that I reconsider procmail!
Maildrop seems to be a bit more modern in its design.
-Dan
On Oct 24, 2008, at 4:58
25 matches
Mail list logo
