On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 05:26:32PM +0100, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a bi Xeon 3.2Ghz 4Go memory Redhat EL4 server as a relay
> connected to Internet. On that server we have an advanced filter
> injecting mail back into postfix 2.5.4 for the anti spam/virus (Sophos
> Puremessage).
>
> Time to time we have lot of mail in the incoming queue, "no" mail in the
> active queue, the "qmgr "is very" slow and the server is very idle. We
> tested the antispam/virus to see if there is a problem but the response
> is very good.
How often does the qmgr(8) process id change?
> T 5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280 1280+
> TOTAL 3201 2121 937 87 11 21 23 0 0 0 1
Almost all the mail in "incoming" is recent, with ~2000 msgs under 5
minutes old, and ~1000 between 5 and 10 minutes old. What happened
leading up to this?
> qshape active
>
> T 5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280 1280+
> TOTAL 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Exactly 32 active messages, all 10-20 minutes old, what happened leading
up to this?
What's in the deferred queue? Read your logs, looking for errors, warnings,
throttled transports and nexthops, ...
Is your disk I/O adequate? ... The information you provide is too skimpy.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
