On Oct 17, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Jim Wright wrote:
If you have compiled your own version of Postfix, this update will
overwrite it. Be prepared to reinstall your own version, or at
minimum restore any configuration files you've changed from the
default
Joey wrote, at 10/17/2008 09:14 PM:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of j debert
>> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:26 AM
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Subject: Re: Finally blocking some spam
>
>> That's still too simple
Stephen Liu wrote:
> Could you please shed me some light on running following commands:-
Well... what about them?
> 1)
> hostname - xen02.satimis.com (guest running on Xen box)
>
> postconf -e 'myhostname = virtual.xen02.satimis.com'
> postconf -e 'mydestination = virtual.xen02.satimis.com, loca
Hi folks,
Debian Etch
Postfix 2.3.8 (on a virtual interface)
Could you please shed me some light on running following commands:-
1)
hostname - xen02.satimis.com (guest running on Xen box)
postconf -e 'myhostname = virtual.xen02.satimis.com'
postconf -e 'mydestination = virtual.xen02.satimis.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of j debert
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:26 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Finally blocking some spam
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Joey さんは書きました:
Camron W. Fox wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:05:06PM -1000, Camron W. Fox wrote:
Alle,
We have the current setup under Postfix 2.3.3:
masquerade_domains = AAA.BBB.org, BBB.org, AAACCC.org, AAA.DDD.ac.jp
sender_canonical_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
/etc/po
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:05:06PM -1000, Camron W. Fox wrote:
Alle,
We have the current setup under Postfix 2.3.3:
masquerade_domains = AAA.BBB.org, BBB.org, AAACCC.org, AAA.DDD.ac.jp
sender_canonical_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
/etc/postfix/canonical:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:46:13PM +0200, Luigi Iotti wrote:
> > > Two seconds later we have 46 bytes of data from the sender.
> >
> > Or is window scaling in effect? And perhaps an edge firewall at the
> > sender's edge system that fails to take window scaling into account?
> >
> > We'd need to
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Wieste Venema wrote:
On MAC client machines, Postfix runs only briefly when a user
submits mail. Apparently, Apple's client configuration runs an
SMTP server that receives mail from the network. This client
configuration is subject to the same rules as any Postfix installat
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:19:17PM -0400, Ofer Inbar wrote:
> Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ofer Inbar:
> > > Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Your queue manager is crashing.
> > > [...]
> > > > Queue manager re-starts.
> > >
> > > Is that a bug? Should it handle
Ofer Inbar:
> Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ofer Inbar:
> > > Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Your queue manager is crashing.
> > > [...]
> > > > Queue manager re-starts.
> > >
> > > Is that a bug? Should it handle this situation more gracefully?
> >
> > No, you
On Oct 17, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
I rejoined the list earlier this week thinking I might see some
mention of this but as I haven't, here goes. I run Postfix on my
Macintosh running Mac OS X 10.5.5 to serve mail for my domain. This
is the standard (client) version of OS X, not
Noel Jones wrote:
Payne wrote:
Hi,
I need to know a way I can block dsn. Someone is out there spoofing
my domain. I am about to hopefully stop some of that with setting up
spf signture for my domain. But I like a way to block the dsn that
are flooding my network. I really like a way to find
Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ofer Inbar:
> > Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Your queue manager is crashing.
> > [...]
> > > Queue manager re-starts.
> >
> > Is that a bug? Should it handle this situation more gracefully?
>
> No, you should not restart the queue ma
Ofer Inbar:
> Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your queue manager is crashing.
> [...]
> > Queue manager re-starts.
>
> Is that a bug? Should it handle this situation more gracefully?
No, you should not restart the queue manager willy-nilly.
Wietse
On MAC client machines, Postfix runs only briefly when a user
submits mail. Apparently, Apple's client configuration runs an
SMTP server that receives mail from the network. This client
configuration is subject to the same rules as any Postfix installation,
i.e. you have to work hard to turn it in
I rejoined the list earlier this week thinking I might see some mention of
this but as I haven't, here goes. I run Postfix on my Macintosh running
Mac OS X 10.5.5 to serve mail for my domain. This is the standard (client)
version of OS X, not the server version.
Last week, Apple issued a secur
Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your queue manager is crashing.
[...]
> Queue manager re-starts.
Is that a bug? Should it handle this situation more gracefully?
Now, a more interesting question:
What is the incremental memory cost of each smtp process?
According to pmap -d, the s
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:16:44AM -0400, Ofer Inbar wrote:
> We recently observed something strange: After doubling the number of
> smtp processes in master.cf and restarting, the size of the active
> queue started fluctuating over time in almost exact inverse of the
> incoming queue. I'm using
We recently observed something strange: After doubling the number of
smtp processes in master.cf and restarting, the size of the active
queue started fluctuating over time in almost exact inverse of the
incoming queue. I'm using Ganglia to track the sizes of the queues on
a graph, and the queue gr
Paul Cocker wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer, but I think I'll try and solve the issue. Once
> the server goes live it will be next to impossible to ever switch
> SELinux back on, while it's undergoing build I can happily try and
> figure this stuff out and better understand it for next time.
A cra
Please do not top post. put your replies after the text you reply to
(like I'm doing below).
Roland de Lepper a écrit :
> /var/mail is a symlinks to /var/spool/mail.
>
> Ok, I managed to get the restrictions working so only users from a
> specific domain are able to relay.
> I specified a file (n
Stephen Liu:
> Oct 17 11:58:26 xen01 postfix/smtp[1717]: 8BAEA205A8:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=mail.satimis.com[220.232.213.178]:25,
> delay=1.2, delays=1.1/0.01/0.09/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for
> mail.satimis.com loops back to myself)
If this must be delivered on xen01,
see http:
Justin McAleer:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 07:28:57PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Trying to index "pcre" tables. Don't do that.
>
> Would it be worth making postmap notice when someone is trying to index
> one of the non-indexed table types, and give a more s
Am 17.10.2008 um 14:28 schrieb Reinaldo de Carvalho:
I wrote a polycd-daemon (python) to check quota on cyrus using imap
protocol (as cyrus admin user).
This policy-daemon search on ldap to check if email is a alias, to get
and retrive quota from real user.
This program is not complete to pub
--- mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- snip -
> > I think my problem is on virtualization networking. Unfortunately
> I
> > haven't figure out how to solve it.
> >
> >
> > This is a Xen box with only one external IP, 220.232.213.178
> connected
> > to the Host. The network setup is as follo
>
> Is there any way to prevent postfix from calling mailbox_transport
> for an account that is over quota and instead produce a bounce message
> notifying the sender of the fact that the mail could not be deliverd?
>
> If not, is there way to make sure that procmail will not end up bouncing
> mess
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 07:28:57PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to index "pcre" tables. Don't do that.
Would it be worth making postmap notice when someone is trying to index
one of the non-indexed table types, and give a more specific warning
about bein
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 October 2008 12:33
> To: Paul Cocker
> Cc: postfix users list
> Subject: RE: Unable to attach disclaimer - permission denied
>
>
> > Oct 17 11:29:07 server kernel: audit(1224239347.861:12):
> avc: denie
Oct 17 11:29:07 server kernel: audit(1224239347.861:12): avc: denied {
execute } for pid=3055 comm="pipe" name="disclaimer" dev=dm-0
ino=10223661 scontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_pipe_t:s0
tcontext=user_u:object_r:postfix_etc_t:s0 tclass=file
Oct 17 11:29:07 server kernel: audit(1224239347
> -Original Message-
> From: Wietse Venema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 October 2008 11:48
> To: Paul Cocker
> Cc: postfix users list
> Subject: Re: Unable to attach disclaimer - permission denied
>
> Paul Cocker:
> > I'm trying to setup disclaimers for e-mails using altermime. I'
Paul Cocker:
> I'm trying to setup disclaimers for e-mails using altermime. I've found
> a guide -
> http://www.howtoforge.com/add-disclaimers-to-outgoing-emails-with-alterm
> ime-postfix-debian-etch, and have set everything up accordingly.
>
> I've added the following lines to master.cf
>
> smtp
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Victor Duchovni
> Inviato: venerdì 17 ottobre 2008 3.26
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Oggetto: Re: R: R: read timeout on cleanup socket on two
> different machines
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at
I'm trying to setup disclaimers for e-mails using altermime. I've found
a guide -
http://www.howtoforge.com/add-disclaimers-to-outgoing-emails-with-alterm
ime-postfix-debian-etch, and have set everything up accordingly.
I've added the following lines to master.cf
smtp inet n - n
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Wietse Venema
> Luigi Iotti:
> > 02:11:15.006582 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 43044, offset 0,
> flags [DF], proto:
> > TCP (6), length: 52) 192.168.0.100.smtp >
> squid-cache.org.54737: ., cksum
> > 0x1d47 (correct), 134:134(0) ack 2
/var/mail is a symlinks to /var/spool/mail.
Ok, I managed to get the restrictions working so only users from a
specific domain are able to relay.
I specified a file (network_table) with CDIR notation e.g.
130.146.105.0/24 and specifyed my networks = /etc/postfix/network_table.
This works only for
Roland de Lepper wrote:
I'm trying to migrate from a sendmail installation to postfix, but i'm
facing some difficulties.
setup:
1. mail will be stored on an automount /var/spool/ in mbox format
you mean /var/spool/mail/? If you have this directory on your system,
then it's probably the defau
37 matches
Mail list logo