Hi folks,
Postfix
Dovecot
Xen
Debian Etch - Host (desktop, running Gnome)
Debian Etch - Guest
I have >10 domUs (guests) running on the Xen box. All of them running
on Debian Etch base without X. I'm prepared making following test;
Build all them as mail server with different hostname
Woul
Johan Str?m:
> Hi
>
> I got a situation where I need to relay ALMOST all mail through
> another mail server. The catch is that I want a few specific sender
> mail addresses to send directly from the postfix itself (as if I
> didn't have a relayhost directive). I've fooled around woth
> sen
Hi
I got a situation where I need to relay ALMOST all mail through
another mail server. The catch is that I want a few specific sender
mail addresses to send directly from the postfix itself (as if I
didn't have a relayhost directive). I've fooled around woth
sender_dependent_relayhost_ma
Thanks for the suggestions, sounds like a good idea.
Which method is the simplest to implement and get up and running?
I am running MailScanner, Postfix, Spamassassin.
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Patrick,
I want a single username and password to be used for
* Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I want a single username and password to be used for all people sending
> through this install.
> Which method would be best for this?
Any method as long as you only create one user and use that for all mail
clients, but I totally agree with Victor:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:13:31AM +1300, Lists wrote:
> I want a single username and password to be used for all people sending
> through this install.
> Which method would be best for this?
None, this is a terrible idea, because you can never change the password
without breaking all the users,
Hi Patrick,
I want a single username and password to be used for all people sending
through this install.
Which method would be best for this?
Kate
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Not sure if this is the right place to post, apologies if it is not.
This is my fir
* Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Not sure if this is the right place to post, apologies if it is not.
>>>
>>> This is my first MailScanner / Postfix install - on CentOS 5.2
>>>
>>> I have attempted to setup the smtp authentication using SASL
>>> following various tutorials.
>>> When I attempted to
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Wray, Oran wrote:
>
>> Here is the results of the postconf -n
>>
>> # postconf -n
>> alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
>> alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
>>
>>
> You do know these are never triggered with local disabled.
>
>> local_recipient_maps =
I've inherited POSTFIX from someone that left a month ago, so I have a lot of
discovery work to do and a lot of questions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Evans -
Postfix List
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:32 PM
To: postfix-use
Wray, Oran wrote:
> Here is the results of the postconf -n
>
> # postconf -n
> alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
> alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
>
You do know these are never triggered with local disabled.
> local_recipient_maps =
> local_transport = error:local mail delivery is disabled
>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:48:40PM -0400, Eddy Beliveau wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using postfix 2.5.4 and it works great :-)
>
> I'm using the following parameters to limit traffic on my server:
>
> smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 10
> anvil_rate_time_unit = 60s
> smtpd_client_event_limit_exce
Wray, Oran wrote:
Here is the results of the postconf -n
[snip]
myhostname = srvmailtmp.marsh.net
$ host srvmailtmp.marsh.net
Host srvmailtmp.marsh.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
if you want to join the internet, please use names registered in the DNS.
[snip]
smtpd[25253]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
"Don't need" but "could be". The standards *could be suggest*
something about loop detection.
only if you can get consensus, which is much harder than you might
think. while almost everybody now agrees that putting the envelope
recipient in a header (except for m
Here is the results of the postconf -n
# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
biff = no
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
data_directory = /var/lib/postfix
debug_peer_level = 1
debug_peer_l
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:48:40PM -0400, Eddy Beliveau wrote:
Hi!
I'm using postfix 2.5.4 and it works great :-)
I'm using the following parameters to limit traffic on my server:
smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 10
anvil_rate_time_unit = 60s
smtpd_client_event_li
Hi!
I'm using postfix 2.5.4 and it works great :-)
I'm using the following parameters to limit traffic on my server:
smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 10
anvil_rate_time_unit = 60s
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions not defined, so default=$mynetworks
I know that any client registered in
Steve Lindemann:
> My problem is that I support a number of email lists (using mailman),
> none are particularly big or busy and, until recently, have been
> chugging merrily along without a problem. However, a number of domains
> we deliver to have suddenly started complaining and my outbound
Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On 10/2/08, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrzej Kukula wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 18:29, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI, RFCs 5321 and 5322 "obsolete" 2821 and 2822 (respectively).
Again there's no mention of Delivered-To header for loop detection.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
>
>> "Delivered to" could be mentioned by the RFC, as well as
>
> No reason to, it has no end-to-end semantics. The only valid consumer
> of "Delivered-
First off, I'm not a postfix expert... in fact I'm no kind of expert,
just a very well rounded jack of all trades. My current install is
fairly generic and I know there are plenty of places it could be
improved (and I would welcome constructive criticism).
My problem is that I support a numbe
mouss:
> Andrzej Kukula wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 18:29, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> FYI, RFCs 5321 and 5322 "obsolete" 2821 and 2822 (respectively).
> >
> > Again there's no mention of Delivered-To header for loop detection.
>
> loop detection is not part of smtp.
>
> > Did yo
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> "Delivered to" could be mentioned by the RFC, as well as
No reason to, it has no end-to-end semantics. The only valid consumer
of "Delivered-To" is the system that added it. The header could be:
X-Loop-COM-EXAMPLE:
an
On 10/2/08, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrzej Kukula wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 18:29, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > FYI, RFCs 5321 and 5322 "obsolete" 2821 and 2822 (respectively).
> > >
> >
> > Again there's no mention of Delivered-To header for loop detection.
> >
Ujjval K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW - There were no instructions in the welcome message..
[...]
> TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
That, right there, looks like a pretty clear instruction to me.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ujjval K wrote:
> Thx for the nice commentsAppreciate your help and everyone on this forum
> has been great...!! I am going to make "sendmail" work
You're welcome. To each his own.
>
> BTW - There were no instructions in the welcome message..
[...]
> [Last updated on: Wed Apr 25 7:
??? ? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > % host css2.ndcorp.com
> > Host css2.ndcorp.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> ?!
>
> For domain lookup You should use whois instead of host
No.
[...]
> Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
> with many different competing r
Thx for the nice commentsAppreciate your help and everyone on this forum
has been great...!! I am going to make "sendmail" work
BTW - There were no instructions in the welcome message..
===
Welcome to the postfix-users maili
Алексей Доморадов wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:03:45 -0400
Subject: Re: receiving smtpd[25253] error from sender
Wray, Oran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
smtpd[25253]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
m
Andrzej Kukula wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 18:29, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI, RFCs 5321 and 5322 "obsolete" 2821 and 2822 (respectively).
Again there's no mention of Delivered-To header for loop detection.
loop detection is not part of smtp.
Did you spot anything useful there?
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 03:36:58PM +0200, rc wrote:
> # header_checks
> /^Date/ PREPEND MIME-Version: 1.0^MContent-Type:
> text/plain^MContent-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I've seen no documentation of support for PREPENDING multiple headers
in this fashion. It should not work, unless something downs
> Moreover, you can safely omit the user@ portions in your transport
> map entries, because the "infamous Exchange 5 bug" (*) will happen
> with all recipients that have the same domain.
I thought so at the beginning too. But this domain is spread in many
countries and every country having its own
Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Goodge:
[FreeBSD ports stuff]
However, when I start Postfix, I get these errors in maillog:
warning: smtpd_sasl_auth_enable is true, but SASL support is not compiled in
Then the FreeBSD ports stuff is broken.
That's what I suspected.
If you look in the Postfix
On 10/1/2008, Ujjval K ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The geniuses at Comcast (my ISP; no, I don't have any choice) have
> suddenly decided that I am a source of spam and hence require me to
> send e-mail to port 587 instead of port 25.
Or maybe you should consider whether you ARE a source of spam.
Mark Goodge:
[FreeBSD ports stuff]
> However, when I start Postfix, I get these errors in maillog:
>
> warning: smtpd_sasl_auth_enable is true, but SASL support is not compiled in
Then the FreeBSD ports stuff is broken.
If you look in the Postfix conf/makedefs.out file, you will probably
find t
Wietse Venema:
> rc:
> > > > #transport
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sevenbit:[my.relayhost]
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sevenbit:[my.relayhost]
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sevenbit:[my.relayhost]
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sevenbit:[my.relayhost]
> >
> > > I recommend that you run ALL mail FROM this appl
Wray, Oran:
> smtpd[25253]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mailgw1.per-se.com[199.190.235.46]: 450 4.1.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sender address rejected: Domain not found; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=ESMTP helo=
css2.ndcorp.com is not valid. The SMTP protocol requires that
rc:
> > > #transport
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sevenbit:[my.relayhost]
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sevenbit:[my.relayhost]
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sevenbit:[my.relayhost]
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sevenbit:[my.relayhost]
>
> > I recommend that you run ALL mail FROM this application through
> > the filter
* Gábor Lénárt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> authoritative DNS servers responds, other problem etc). I really don't
> understand why you'd like to force this whois thing here ... It won't help
> you to solve this problem ...
Amen.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postf
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 12:15:43PM +0400, Алексей Доморадов wrote:
> > css2.ndcorp.com is not delegated, but ndcorp.com is:
> I think css2.ndcorp.com it's a host, not subdomain
And? It does not matter. Postfix like any other MTA does A and MX record
lookup from DNS, it does not care about wh
I've been asked to add SASL authentication to an existing Postfix server
used for outbound mail. For a variety of reasons (but primarily because
it integrates more easily with MySQL), we're planning to use Dovecot as
the authentication server.
I've installed Dovecot, and it works OK. (The serv
> > WHOIS is use to look up the REGISTRATION details od a delegated domain.
> If domain does not exist there are no REGISTRATION detail. Are you agree?
No.
I can make up gkdgfkgkgkasgk.charite.de, yet the domain charite.de has
registration details in the whois
> > css2.ndcorp.com is not delegat
> > For domain lookup You should use whois instead of host
>
> Nonsense.
>
> $ host css2.ndcorp.com
> Host css2.ndcorp.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> $ host -t mx css2.ndcorp.com
> Host css2.ndcorp.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
>
> WHOIS is use to look up the REGISTRATION details od a delegated domai
> > > smtpd[25253]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > > mailgw1.per-se.com[199.190.235.46]: 450 4.1.8
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address rejected: Domain not found;
> > > from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=ESMTP
> > > helo=
> For domain lookup You should use whois instead o
-Original Message-
From: Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:03:45 -0400
Subject: Re: receiving smtpd[25253] error from sender
>
> Wray, Oran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > smtpd[25253]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > mailgw1.per-se
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Ujjval K wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ujjval K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: postfix users list
Subject: Re: New Postfix install
Thx I was able to change MTAs to point to postfix...
However , here is teh next error
46 matches
Mail list logo
