On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> "Delivered to" could be mentioned by the RFC, as well as
No reason to, it has no end-to-end semantics. The only valid consumer
of "Delivered-To" is the system that added it. The header could be:
X-Loop-COM-EXAMPLE: <date> <hmac-sha1(secret, date+address)>
and would work just as well (or perhaps better) for loop detection.
The point is that RFCs don't need to cover purely local issues.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
