Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently have several virtual mail domains with various users/aliases;
> some mail addresses are aliased like:
By "virtual mail domains" do you mean virtual alias domains or virtual
mailbox domains? I assume you mean the former.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freebsd 6.3
mx1# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 2.6-20080606
main.cf
content-filter = snfilter
master.cf
snfilter unix - n n - 10 pipe
flags=q user=snfilter argv=/var/spool/snfilter/sniffer
-f ${sender} ${recipient}
mx1# ll /var/spool/snfi
I currently have several virtual mail domains with various users/aliases;
some mail addresses are aliased like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that all works fine, BUT, mail server for domainAAA.tld is going to be
transferred away from here to msexchange server at users' own location,
and,
Cameron Camp wrote:
without your IP, your hostname and your sender domain(s) that you use,
there is absoluetly no way for us to help you.
and even with all the infos, it's not sure we can help.
--
66.11.124.130
mail.logicalwebhost.com
sending domain campworkz.com
$ who
> without your IP, your hostname and your sender domain(s) that you use,
> there is absoluetly no way for us to help you.
>
> and even with all the infos, it's not sure we can help.
--
66.11.124.130
mail.logicalwebhost.com
sending domain campworkz.com
thx,
Cameron
Cameron Camp wrote:
I'm getting more complaints from users on a virtual host box not
delivering, or being found in people's junk mailboxes, though mail seems
to be getting to my gmail/hotmail accounts fine. Is there anything
stupid on my main.cf I should change to help this? I'm not blacklisted
a
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:11 -0400, Jeff wrote:
Jeff wrote:
I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user
basis:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or
I'm getting more complaints from users on a virtual host box not
delivering, or being found in people's junk mailboxes, though mail seems
to be getting to my gmail/hotmail accounts fine. Is there anything
stupid on my main.cf I should change to help this? I'm not blacklisted
anywhere and my ptr rec
Anton Yuzhaninov:
> >> 20080411
> >>
> >> Bugfix (introduced Postfix 2.3): the queue manager would
> >> initialize missing client logging attributes (from xforward)
> >> with real client attributes. Fix: enable this backwards
> >> compatibility feature only with queu
Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:53:07AM -0400, Adam Mason wrote:
>
> > ifconfig lo0 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.0.0 -arp up
>
> Leave the *primary* IP address of lo0 as 127.0.0.1, add "1.2.3.4"
> (examples really should use 192.0.2.0/24 addresses) as a secondary
> IP address for lo0. Co
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:11 -0400, Jeff wrote:
> > Jeff wrote:
> >> I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user
> >> basis:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
On 25.09.2008 04:52, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
Anton Yuzhaninov:
In postfix-2.5.4 environment variable CLIENT_HOSTNAME is not set at all, if
hostname is unknown.
Older version work in different way - env variable CLIENT_HOSTNAME set to
string unknown.
Why this chan
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:53:07AM -0400, Adam Mason wrote:
> ifconfig lo0 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.0.0 -arp up
Leave the *primary* IP address of lo0 as 127.0.0.1, add "1.2.3.4"
(examples really should use 192.0.2.0/24 addresses) as a secondary
IP address for lo0. Commands for adding secondary IPs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noel Jones wrote:
| Jay Deiman wrote:
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Hello all,
|>
|> I'm wondering, when setting up a policy daemon, can you respond to
|> Postfix with multiple actions?
|
| The expected results are the same
Jay Deiman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I'm wondering, when setting up a policy daemon, can you respond to
Postfix with multiple actions?
The expected results are the same as an access(5) table.
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
Multiple main.cf UCE res
Adam Mason:
> Sep 29 10:45:38 {hostname} postfix/smtpd[39862]: warning: problem talking to
> server 127.0.0.1:10023: Permission denied
If you configure lo0 to be something other than 127.0.0.1,
then what interface listens on the 127.0.0.1 address?
Wietse
Jeff wrote:
Jeff wrote:
I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user
basis:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or would it be
@domain.tld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
http://
Jay Deiman wrote:
Hello all,
I'm wondering, when setting up a policy daemon, can you respond to
Postfix with multiple actions?
No.
For example, could I respond to the
policy service request with both a "PREPEND X-Something: yada yada" and
a "DUNNO"? If so, do I just separate the responses
Stephen Holmes wrote:
mouss wrote:
so for some reason, postfix can't open a map configuration file.
here
$ ls -l /usr/local/etc/postfix/maps/sql/mailbox
-rw--- 1 root wheel 400 Jul 14 22:08 mailbox
did you notice that this is only readable by root?
and it works without problems.
I have some mail servers running postfix on FreeBSD that I am trying to
configure to work with a load balancer. I need to configure the lo0
loopback interface to use the IP address the load balancer will be handling
for this group of mail servers. Also I need to turn off ARP on the
interface to k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I'm wondering, when setting up a policy daemon, can you respond to
Postfix with multiple actions? For example, could I respond to the
policy service request with both a "PREPEND X-Something: yada yada" and
a "DUNNO"? If so, do I just sep
> Jeff wrote:
>> I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user
>> basis:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Or would it be
>> @domain.tld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> T
Jeff wrote:
I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user
basis:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or would it be
@domain.tld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
http://www.postfix.
I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user
basis:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or would it be
@domain.tld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
I have some mail servers running postfix on FreeBSD that I am trying to
configure to work with a load balancer. I need to configure the lo0
loopback interface to use the IP address the load balancer will be handling
for this group of mail servers. Also I need to turn off ARP on the
interface to k
mouss wrote:
so for some reason, postfix can't open a map configuration file.
here
$ ls -l /usr/local/etc/postfix/maps/sql/mailbox
-rw--- 1 root wheel 400 Jul 14 22:08 mailbox
and it works without problems.
And I have -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 165 Sep 29 13:45 virtual-mailbox-maps.cf
w
SH wrote:
Hi Postfix users,
I know that this is a n00b level question, but my head hurts trying to
resolve an issue with virtual accounts and I can't seem to find anything
to help with this specific thing...
I have a postfix 2.3.8/dovecot 1.1/mysql 5.0 setup with 3 virtual
domains, mailboxes
Hi Postfix users,
I know that this is a n00b level question, but my head hurts trying to
resolve an issue with virtual accounts and I can't seem to find anything
to help with this specific thing...
I have a postfix 2.3.8/dovecot 1.1/mysql 5.0 setup with 3 virtual
domains, mailboxes and aliase
Dear Wietse,
> Citing from the patch below:
>
>Workaround for "file has 2 links" warnings in showq.
You're simply the best! Thanks!
--
Zbigniew Szalbot
Zbigniew Szalbot:
> I have just seen this snippet in maillog:
> Sep 29 09:09:11 relay postfix/showq[21060]: warning:
> deferred/3/3559EB80E7: uid 125: file has 2 links
Wietse:
Postfix use the standard rename() function to move mail between incoming,
> active and deferred queues. Depending on the u
Zbigniew Szalbot:
> Hello,
>
> >> > I have just seen this snippet in maillog:
> >> >
> >> > Sep 29 09:09:11 relay postfix/showq[21060]: warning:
> >> > deferred/3/3559EB80E7: uid 125: file has 2 links
> >
> > Postfix use the standard rename() function to move mail between incoming,
> > active and
Hi,
>> I have never seen this warning on my own systems, but many years
>> ago someone using Solaris reported a "file has 2 links" warning on
>> the mailing list.
>
> If a system is powered off during a rename() operation, a file may
> indeed have 2 links. It takes two disk I/O's to rename a file,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:46:03AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Sep 29 09:09:11 relay postfix/showq[21060]: warning:
> > > deferred/3/3559EB80E7: uid 125: file has 2 links
>
> Postfix use the standard rename() function to move mail between incoming,
> active and deferred queues. Depending on
Hello,
>> > I have just seen this snippet in maillog:
>> >
>> > Sep 29 09:09:11 relay postfix/showq[21060]: warning:
>> > deferred/3/3559EB80E7: uid 125: file has 2 links
>
> Postfix use the standard rename() function to move mail between incoming,
> active and deferred queues. Depending on the un
Jay Chandler:
> Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have just seen this snippet in maillog:
> >
> > Sep 29 09:09:11 relay postfix/showq[21060]: warning:
> > deferred/3/3559EB80E7: uid 125: file has 2 links
Postfix use the standard rename() function to move mail between incoming,
active an
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I have just seen this snippet in maillog:
Sep 29 09:09:11 relay postfix/showq[21060]: warning:
deferred/3/3559EB80E7: uid 125: file has 2 links
I googled for an answer and the only suggestion I have found was about
possible file system corruption. I hope this is
Hello,
I have just seen this snippet in maillog:
Sep 29 09:09:11 relay postfix/showq[21060]: warning:
deferred/3/3559EB80E7: uid 125: file has 2 links
I googled for an answer and the only suggestion I have found was about
possible file system corruption. I hope this is not the case with my
syste
37 matches
Mail list logo
