Re: Race in simplest after-queue content filter?

2008-09-20 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Note: When I wrote this email I supplied 3 attachments, the files both6, both7, and both8. However the message bounced because of it's size, so I am attaching only the both6 libpcap dump. I am happy to supply the other dumps, or whatever else may be helpful. On 09/11/2008 05:55:27 AM, Wietse V

Re: Postfix errors

2008-09-20 Thread Barney Desmond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hungry Snail wrote: > Sahil Tandon wrote: >> Clearly, *something* has changed. >> > Um, well no nothing has changed I think I would know if I had changed > something. *You* haven't changed anything, but something has. Zero-maintenance systems don't ex

Re: Postfix errors

2008-09-20 Thread Hungry Snail
Sahil Tandon wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> Recently (about 3 weeks ago) my postfix setup started emailing and >> logging >> errors. >> >> nothing has changed and it has worked well for the last 8 months, my max >> connections for mysql is 800 so I dont see how it can have too many >> connections

Re: Client Trouble with SASL AUTH

2008-09-20 Thread Drew Tomlinson
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: * Sahil Tandon : Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My ISP has implemented SASL AUTH on its smtp server. Thus I now have to setup my postfix client to provide login information. I've read the docs and added the relevant lines to my main.cf file. T

Re: SASL authentication failure - NETBSD

2008-09-20 Thread mouss
Sahil Tandon wrote: J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now everything is happy. Great! As an aside, I noticed (when replying to your message) that sbcmx4.prodigy.net is rejecting connections from my MX thusly: 553 5.3.0 flpi113 - m8KGIgl3025928, DNSBL:521< 206.251.255.39 >_is_blocked

Re: Postfix errors

2008-09-20 Thread Sahil Tandon
Hungry Snail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Recently (about 3 weeks ago) my postfix setup started emailing and logging > errors. > > nothing has changed and it has worked well for the last 8 months, my max > connections for mysql is 800 so I dont see how it can have too many > connect

Re: SASL authentication failure - NETBSD

2008-09-20 Thread Sahil Tandon
J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now everything is happy. Great! As an aside, I noticed (when replying to your message) that sbcmx4.prodigy.net is rejecting connections from my MX thusly: 553 5.3.0 flpi113 - m8KGIgl3025928, DNSBL:521< 206.251.255.39 >_is_blocked. __For_information_see

Re: Client Trouble with SASL AUTH

2008-09-20 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Sahil Tandon : > Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My ISP has implemented SASL AUTH on its smtp server. Thus I now have to > > setup my postfix client to provide login information. I've read the docs > > and added the relevant lines to my main.cf file. > > > > The SASL AUTH par

Re: Client Trouble with SASL AUTH

2008-09-20 Thread Sahil Tandon
Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My ISP has implemented SASL AUTH on its smtp server. Thus I now have to > setup my postfix client to provide login information. I've read the docs > and added the relevant lines to my main.cf file. > > The SASL AUTH part seems to be working but I kee

Re: Client Trouble with SASL AUTH

2008-09-20 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here's the same session with the Postfix smtp client with smtp -v set in > master.cf: > > --- BEGIN --- > > Sep 20 07:48:17 blacklamb postfix/smtp[8558]: smtp_connect_addr: trying: > smtpauth.surewest.net[66.60.130.153] port 25... > Sep 20 07:48:17 blackl

Postfix errors

2008-09-20 Thread Hungry Snail
Hi Guys, Recently (about 3 weeks ago) my postfix setup started emailing and logging errors. Sep 20 15:01:46 mail postfix/trivial-rewrite[30087]: fatal: proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem Sep 20 15:02:00 mail dovecot: auth-worker(default)

Client Trouble with SASL AUTH

2008-09-20 Thread Drew Tomlinson
My ISP has implemented SASL AUTH on its smtp server. Thus I now have to setup my postfix client to provide login information. I've read the docs and added the relevant lines to my main.cf file. The SASL AUTH part seems to be working but I keep getting errors about "Recipient address rejected

Re: SASL authentication failure - NETBSD

2008-09-20 Thread J.D. Bronson
At 12:18 PM 9/20/2008 -0400, you wrote: J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running NetBSD 4.0 and pkg installed cyrus > and cram/digest/login mechanisms. I opted for another solution: Installed the pkgsrc of db4 then rebuilt cyrus against that then rebuilt postfix against all of t

Re: SASL authentication failure - NETBSD

2008-09-20 Thread Sahil Tandon
J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running NetBSD 4.0 and pkg installed cyrus > and cram/digest/login mechanisms. > > I then roll my own postfix and link against these accordingly. > > > (I have postfix/sasl2 running fine under solaris, so I have the ideas down) > > > But on this machi

SASL authentication failure - NETBSD

2008-09-20 Thread J.D. Bronson
I am running NetBSD 4.0 and pkg installed cyrus and cram/digest/login mechanisms. I then roll my own postfix and link against these accordingly. (I have postfix/sasl2 running fine under solaris, so I have the ideas down) But on this machine, I cannot get postfix to auth: I see the cram/digest

Re: Experiences with BATV?

2008-09-20 Thread Bernd-Ludwig Wenning
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:41:30 +0200, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] an alternative to BATV in this case (when all mail goes via your MTAs) is to use "sub-addresses" (extensions): -(output) use smtp_generic_maps to rewrite the envelope sender (only the envelope sender. no header rewrite

Re: Experiences with BATV?

2008-09-20 Thread mouss
Bernd-Ludwig Wenning wrote: Hello, I'm currently thinking about adding BATV to our mailserver (which is Postfix 2.5.5), because we receive backscatter waves to valid addresses from time to time. When searching the web I came across the following two solutions: http://sourceforge.net/projects

Re: Experiences with BATV?

2008-09-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Bernd-Ludwig Wenning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > I'm currently thinking about adding BATV to our mailserver (which is > Postfix 2.5.5), because we receive backscatter waves to valid addresses > from time to time. When searching the web I came across the following two > solutions: > ht

Re: Why "may be forged"?

2008-09-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > RH> Ask on the sendmail list. smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl is running > RH> sendmail 8.13.8 > > I liked your other reply better :) Oh, well. You can't always get what you want :9 -- Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postfix - Ei

Re: Why "may be forged"?

2008-09-20 Thread lists . postfix-users
Hello Ralf, On Saturday September 20 2008, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote to postfix-users@postfix.org: RH> Ask on the sendmail list. smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl is running RH> sendmail 8.13.8 I liked your other reply better :) I don't use sendmail and the xs4all help desk is nowadays very unhelpful. The chan

Re: Why "may be forged"?

2008-09-20 Thread lists . postfix-users
Hallo Ralf, Op zaterdag 20 september 2008 schreef Ralf Hildebrandt aan postfix-users@postfix.org: RH> $ host -t A duinheks.nl RH> duinheks.nl has no A record Ah, that was a very useful answer, and easily fixed. I really should read up on al this DNS stuff. Thank you very much! Groeten,

Experiences with BATV?

2008-09-20 Thread Bernd-Ludwig Wenning
Hello, I'm currently thinking about adding BATV to our mailserver (which is Postfix 2.5.5), because we receive backscatter waves to valid addresses from time to time. When searching the web I came across the following two solutions: http://sourceforge.net/projects/batv-milter/ http://babel

Re: Why "may be forged"?

2008-09-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > This morning I sent a message from my system at home to my > user account with my provider. When I looked at the headers > I noticed the following received header line: > from duinheks.nl (duinheks.nl [82.95.255.219] (may be forged)) by $ hos

Re: Why "may be forged"?

2008-09-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > This morning I sent a message from my system at home to my > user account with my provider. When I looked at the headers > I noticed the following received header line: > from duinheks.nl (duinheks.nl [82.95.255.219] (may be forged)) by > smt

Why "may be forged"?

2008-09-20 Thread lists . postfix-users
Hello, This morning I sent a message from my system at home to my user account with my provider. When I looked at the headers I noticed the following received header line: from duinheks.nl (duinheks.nl [82.95.255.219] (may be forged)) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8K6up830

Re: destination_rate_delay clarification

2008-09-20 Thread Sahil Tandon
Julius Suarez (GMail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I have in my master.cf: > slow unix - - n - - smtp > > in my transport: > ex.domain slow: > > and > main.cf: > slow_destination_rate_delay = 5s > > Will this mean > - my Postfix server will have a 5 sec.