Re: nvidia-driver-570 failing at 1500051+?

2025-07-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello! Thanks for explanation and commit links. I will update my src next days, so actual build error will be go away. Cheers! Tomoaki AOKI escreveu (domingo, 27/07/2025 à(s) 12:27): > On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 11:51:28 +0100 > Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I

nvidia-driver-570 failing at 1500051+?

2025-07-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
t;= kva_layout.dmap_low && va < kva_layout.dmap_high) | ^ 2 errors generated. ``` Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: Introduce wxwidgets 3.3 devel branch releases to ports

2025-07-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, I did some work on 3.3. It builds ok. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288467 Cheers, Chris escreveu (sexta, 25/07/2025 à(s) 00:13): > On 2025-07-24 11:28, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello, > > > > 3.3 branch means devel branch and upstream have rel

Re: Introduce wxwidgets 3.3 devel branch releases to ports

2025-07-24 Thread Nuno Teixeira
_SITELIBDIR}/wx/__init__.py + # Set _WX_SHVER_comp_ver to 0 and _WX_FILE_comp_ver for libs appropriately. # Set _WX_DEPTYPE_comp_ver for "python" to "run", and others to "lib". Cheers, Chris escreveu (quinta, 24/07/2025 à(s) 16:33): > On 2025-07-23 12:37, Nuno

Re: Introduce wxwidgets 3.3 devel branch releases to ports

2025-07-23 Thread Nuno Teixeira
as it can be coinstalled with wx30/wx32 ports i see no reason why > not > to add and use wx33 port for software that requires it. > > Cheers, > Max > > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Introduce wxwidgets 3.3 devel branch releases to ports

2025-07-23 Thread Nuno Teixeira
are welcome, Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Introduce wxwidgets 3.3 devel branch releases to ports

2025-07-23 Thread Nuno Teixeira
e branches... Please take a look at: https://github.com/aardappel/treesheets/issues/1064#issuecomment-3106748619 At this point, treesheets will be in stale status and I don't know what to do: add wx 3.3 port or deprecate treesheets... Any hints are welcome, Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBS

Re: poudriere -b latest: Package fetch: Failed to fetch package repository.

2025-07-07 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, Thanks for PR link. Cheers Vincent Miller escreveu (segunda, 7/07/2025 à(s) 17:23): > See https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1228 for prospective patch > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:21 AM Nuno Teixeira wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On 14.3R jail poudrie

poudriere -b latest: Package fetch: Failed to fetch package repository.

2025-07-07 Thread Nuno Teixeira
repository. [00:00:31] Checking packages for incremental rebuild needs ``` Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-06-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
it is correct to follow https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=aa1da009b4081b25bb162b0c4177e872ca0b81a3 to fix it. Thanks! Baptiste Daroussin escreveu (quarta, 12/03/2025 à(s) 15:02): > > > 12 mars 2025 à 16:01 "Nuno Teixeira" > > a écrit: > > > This is expec

Re: lang/go124: fatal: bad g in signal handler

2025-05-31 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello David, Thanks. I've missed it on @current list and I following it now. Cheers. David Wolfskill escreveu (sábado, 31/05/2025 à(s) 12:00): > On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 11:43:30AM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello, > > > > After updating from main 2025051

Re: Renew Julia Language

2025-04-11 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, The port lang/julia expired because it depends on security/mbedtls2. The > first thing would be to check if it can support security/mbedtls3. https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/56708 shows that they moved from mbedtls to openssl. Cheers, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX:

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-03-12 Thread Nuno Teixeira
y unusable because the ports tree do > not > provide a 32bit version of libX11.so.6. Adding NO_SHLIB_REQUIRES_GLOB=* to x11/nvidia-driver/Makefile solves the issue. Should danfe@ be CCed to be in touch with this issues? Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-03-12 Thread Nuno Teixeira
that I see. go* and llvm* are OK. Thanks, Nuno Teixeira escreveu (quarta, 26/02/2025 à(s) 08:31): > Same with pkg-2.0.99.5 and poudriere-devel-3.4.99.20250209: > > > testport 2 times on net/speedtest-go > > [00:00:06] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting ports-mgmt/pkg-devel | pkg-2

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-02-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
:32 Building devel/llvm19@default | llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase Guido Falsi escreveu (quinta, 13/02/2025 à(s) 07:18): > > > On 11/02/25 21:53, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > (...) > > > > pkg 2.0.6 doesn't solve issue with go: > > > > test

Re: /etc/localtime symlink in poudriere jails

2025-02-25 Thread Nuno Teixeira
this to upstream. Thanks, Dag-Erling Smørgrav escreveu (quarta, 11/12/2024 à(s) 09:37): > Nuno Teixeira writes: > > I'm trying to find why there is no /etc/localtime in poudriere jails > > and I need to create manually a symlink for some R-cran tests inside > > inter

Re: cran.mk strange do-test

2025-02-13 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) MAKE_ENV+= LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 OK MAKE_ENV+= LC_ALL=C FAIL Nuno Teixeira escreveu (quinta, 13/02/2025 à(s) 18:50): > Hello, > > Just tested OK: > > +MAKE_ENV+= LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 > > As you are suspecting that LC_ALL is affecting tests, you can now test > with ot

Re: cran.mk strange do-test

2025-02-13 Thread Nuno Teixeira
skipped). > > I changed the command in cran.mk to '/bin/sh /root/test.sh' - the test > fails > > (as in github issue)! > > > > Do you have any idea why fails with ports framework and how can fix it? > > > > Thanks, > > Zsolt > > > > [1] https://github.com/r-lib/sessioninfo/issues/111 > > [2] https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/Mk/Uses/cran.mk#n39 > > > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-02-13 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Maybe we can open a go PR demonstrating this results and a link to https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204 Maybe go team understand the problem? Cheers Guido Falsi escreveu (quinta, 13/02/2025 à(s) 07:18): > > > On 11/02/25 21:53, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > (...) &g

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-02-11 Thread Nuno Teixeira
] [01] [00:00:00] Warning: go121-1.21.13_1 will be rebuilt as it misses libc.so.6:32 [00:00:03] [01] [00:00:00] Building lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase Nuno Teixeira escreveu (segunda, 10/02/2025 à(s) 07:59): > > poudriere-devel-3.4.99.20250209 main >>

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-02-10 Thread Nuno Teixeira
> poudriere-devel-3.4.99.20250209 main > > Using bulk on *existing* repo it loops on both go121 and 123 and also > nvidia. > Repeat process and same. > > Since that repo was build *without* PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes, I cleaned > (pkgclean -A) it and I'm building it from scratch at the moment. > W

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-02-09 Thread Nuno Teixeira
On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>>>> On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: > >>>>>> On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > >>>>>>> Hello Rainer, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>

Re: cran.mk strange do-test

2025-02-09 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ged the command in cran.mk to '/bin/sh /root/test.sh' - the test > fails > (as in github issue)! > > Do you have any idea why fails with ports framework and how can fix it? > > Thanks, > Zsolt > > [1] https://github.com/r-lib/sessioninfo/issues/111 > [2] https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/Mk/Uses/cran.mk#n39 > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: How can i prevent blueprint-compiler from generating pycache files thus causing build_fs_violation

2025-02-04 Thread Nuno Teixeira
piler/outputs/xml/__pycache__ > > extra: > > > usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/blueprintcompiler/outputs/__pycache__ > > extra: > usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/blueprintcompiler/__pycache__ > > extra: > > > usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/blueprintcompiler/language/__pycache__ > > =>> Cleaning up wrkdir > > > > https://github.com/nxjosephofficial/flare-ports > > > > Best regards, > > > > Yusuf. > > > > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: committer for Bug 284521 - astro/google-earth-pro: update to 7.3.6.10201

2025-02-03 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ing distinfo. > > Regards > > John > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-02-01 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello Mark! Note: I do not know why, but aarch64 does not get MULTILIB to > also span armv7 (aarch32). So aarch64 might not have this > problem being visible as stands. I confirm that aarch64 doesn't have this problem. main-n275011-dbedcc169f70 poudriere-devel PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes `pkg

www/webkit2-gtk: Switch to clang

2025-01-29 Thread Nuno Teixeira
lla/show_bug.cgi?id=284445 Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: webkit-gtk consumers: blank screen

2025-01-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) Found a good PR that might address this issue: www/webkit2-gtk3: certain webpages the browser shows a blank page (Cannot create EGL window surface) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229491 Nuno Teixeira escreveu (segunda, 27/01/2025 à(s) 18:22): > Hello all, > &

webkit-gtk consumers: blank screen

2025-01-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
. Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
6.01.25 um 19:12 schrieb Nuno Teixeira: > > I've got same pkg issue like yours. > > > > My case is happening with poudriere builds on llvm19 since I have it > > default. > > So, every pkg that depends on it, I'll get a rebuild of llvm19. > > > > L

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
FREEBSD_HOST=https://download.FreeBSD.org 59c59 < USE_TMPFS=yes --- > USE_TMPFS=no 192c192 < # PARALLEL_JOBS=1 --- > PARALLEL_JOBS=2 226c226 < # ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes --- > ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes Cheers, Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 26/01/2025 à(s) 21:25): > I use poudrier

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
hat poudriere-devel *without* PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes in poudriere.conf solves this issue. Again I use this option for some months without problems until now. See also: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/poudriere-determining-shlib-requirements.94794/ -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ulog.0 => /lib/libulog.so.0 > 7:-lipt.0 => /lib/libipt.so.0 > > Here, we will take a break for the time being :) > > Regards. > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
using poudriere.conf PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes to avoid that rebuilds. I'm doing test without that option and poudriere is rebuilding everything again :) Hope I don't get bad dreams tonite... Cheers, Guido Falsi escreveu (domingo, 26/01/2025 à(s) 19:53): > On 26

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) Same after a portrevision bump on llvm19: [00:00:15] [01] [00:00:00] Warning: llvm19-19.1.7_1 will be rebuilt as it misses libc++.so.1:32 [00:00:15] [01] [00:00:00] Building devel/llvm19@default | llvm19-19.1.7_1: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase :( Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 26

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Something say to me that it is something wrong with pkg 2.x and I will try a bump to see what happens like: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=345307cb539e2e81ddc70cd22f85ea34b4fac043 Cheers, Rainer Hurling escreveu (domingo, 26/01/2025 à(s) 16:51): > Am 26.01.25 um 16:36 schrieb

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) poudriere-devel-3.4.99.20250115 poudriere.conf: + PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes EDIT: pkg 2.0.4 doesn't fixed issue Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 26/01/2025 à(s) 15:21): > Ok, I can reproduce this on a new jail: > > # cd /usr/src > # make buildworld-jobs buildkernel-j

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
E_NATIVE OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=BE_STANDARD OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=MLIR .endif DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=19 -- Thanks, Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 26/01/2025 à(s) 12:38): > (...) > > Also I delete all pkg in new jail everytime I upgrade: > > > # make buildworld-jobs buildkerne

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) Also I delete all pkg in new jail everytime I upgrade: > # make buildworld-jobs buildkernel-jobs > # ./tools/build/beinstall.sh > # reboot # poudriere pkgclean -A -j 15amd64 -p main > # poudriere jail -u -j 15amd64 # poudriere bulk -j 15amd64 -p main -f /path/to/list.ports N

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
upgrade it? Dimitry Andric escreveu (domingo, 26/01/2025 à(s) 12:23): > Does your jail have /usr/lib32/libc++.so.1? > > -Dimitry > > > On 26 Jan 2025, at 13:18, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > > > > As usual everytime I upgrade: > > > > # make buil

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
issed shlib > PORTREVISION chase > > > > It repeats this loop every time I run a testport. > > > > Any clues? > > Is it looking for the 32-bit version of libc++.so.1? How did you setup > your jail? > > -Dimitry > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) ls -l /lib/libc++* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1010848 Jan 25 23:40 /lib/libc++.so.1 Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 26/01/2025 à(s) 11:45): > (...) > > ll /usr/lib/libc++* > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9389840 Jan 25 23:40 /usr/lib/libc++.a > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) ll /usr/lib/libc++* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9389840 Jan 25 23:40 /usr/lib/libc++.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48 Aug 22 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 948 Jan 25 23:40 /usr/lib/libc++experimental.a Why is libc++.so.1 missing? Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 26

poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
? Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: Python: Switch from distutils to pep517

2025-01-09 Thread Nuno Teixeira
should exist to connect all indidual PRs. With an updated pep517 wiki this will be easier to execute. Thoughts? Thanks, Charlie Li escreveu (quinta, 9/01/2025 à(s) 05:41): > Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > How is the status of switching from deprecated distutils

Python: Switch from distutils to pep517

2025-01-07 Thread Nuno Teixeira
eel@${PY_FLAVOR} Or ${PY_SETUPTOOLS} should be replaced with ? ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}setuptools>0:devel/py-setuptools@${PY_FLAVOR} Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: /etc/localtime symlink in poudriere jails

2025-01-03 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Dag-Erling Smørgrav escreveu (quarta, 11/12/2024 à(s) 09:37): > Nuno Teixeira writes: > > I'm trying to find why there is no /etc/localtime in poudriere jails > > and I need to create manually a symlink for some R-cran tests inside > > interactive jail. > > Thi

Re: /etc/localtime symlink in poudriere jails

2024-12-14 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ill search "my" r-cran ports for a good canditate example and post it here. As I remember almost all tests complains about /etc/localtime symlink ist't configured correctly, some tests were fixed already upstream. Cheers, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

/etc/localtime symlink in poudriere jails

2024-12-11 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ore I open a poudriere pr. Thanks in advance, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: thunderbird 128.4.0 build fail on -current

2024-10-28 Thread Nuno Teixeira
https://github.com/joncampbell123/dosbox-x/issues/5259 Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 27/10/2024 à(s) 13:54): > Hello, > > Getting similar results on emulators/dosbox-x: > ### > usr/include/c++/v1/string:2861:5: error: implicit instantiation of > undefined template 'st

Re: thunderbird 128.4.0 build fail on -current

2024-10-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
| ^ > > 1 error generated. > > > > .. which appears to be similar to the issue with devel/poco and fixed > > in commit c55157301f317ab8166349340d4cc0765deaac12, > > FYI, I filed PR282347 with the fix. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282347 > > Jung-uk Kim > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

bugzilla: add url link to a word

2024-08-10 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello all, How can I use a [word] that links to a url in bugzilla? e.g.: 278921 <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278921> Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: Update llvm to newer version

2024-07-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
time I do it in a updated poudriere jail, I will use this change only on my ports collection by using a custom poudriere.d/15amd64-make.conf and leave releases with default values for ports testing. This way I don't get false results for port committing. It will be fun! Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: Update llvm to newer version

2024-07-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
reduce builds dependency to just one llvm instead of two: 15 and 17 happening on my ports list build. Well, as we see, I really need some enlightment in this subject :) Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: Duplicity ResourceWarning: unclosed file

2024-07-15 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) My logs on amd64 main, 141, 140 and 133 are fine without errors. Thanks, Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 14/07/2024 à(s) 13:15): > Hello Xavier, > > I'm running duplicity on amd64 main with no problems (backup and checked > --version). > > I don't have ac

Re: Duplicity ResourceWarning: unclosed file

2024-07-14 Thread Nuno Teixeira
> sys:1: ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.TextIOWrapper > name='/usr/ports/sysutils/duplicity/work/stage/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/duplicity-3.0.0.dist-info/RECORD' > > mode='r' encoding='utf-8'> > > = > > Should I report upstream ? > > Regards, > > Xavier > > -- > Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Engineer > https://www.amdh.fr > > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: Extend go.mk to be able to download from different additional sources

2024-07-01 Thread Nuno Teixeira
tter idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to > produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- > Rich Cook > > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: mesa-dri-24.0.8 failing to build on d1bd097d52cb

2024-06-01 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) commit 108de784513d87bbe850e7b003a73e26b5b54caa Author: Val Packett Date: Fri May 31 08:45:02 2024 -0600 Redefine CLOCK_BOOTTIME to alias CLOCK_MONOTONIC, not CLOCK_UPTIME Nuno Teixeira escreveu (sábado, 1/06/2024 à(s) 09:01): > Hello all, > > Anyone seeing this erro

mesa-dri-24.0.8 failing to build on d1bd097d52cb

2024-06-01 Thread Nuno Teixeira
^ ./src/intel/common/xe/intel_gem.c:66:9: note: previous case defined here 66 |case CLOCK_MONOTONIC: | ^ /usr/include/sys/_clock_id.h:56:26: note: expanded from macro 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' 56 | #define CLOCK_MONOTONIC 4 | ^ 1 error generated. -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: Our ld doesn't like elf_aarch64: error: unknown emulation

2024-05-06 Thread Nuno Teixeira
aarch64fbsd aarch64fbsdb aarch64haiku aarch64linux aarch64linux32 aarch64linux32b aarch64linuxb aarch64pe ``` Any clues about "elf_aarch64" and "aarch64elf" mismatch? Thanks, Nuno Teixeira escreveu (domingo, 5/05/2024 à(s) 09:57): > Hello all, >

Our ld doesn't like elf_aarch64: error: unknown emulation

2024-05-05 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ot; Does devel/binutils should be used to fix that? And how? Full log: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere2/data/main-arm64-default/pb78025a96ed9_s3c1be0b2615/logs/slurm-wlm-23.11.6.log Thanks in advance, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: I've started collecting tmpfs usage figures from a poudriere-devel bulk -a for later publishing some of the top ones (handy for TMPFS_BLACKLIST judgments)

2024-05-02 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ng if a dynamic control could exist to put ports on TMPFS_BLACKLIST when a limit is reached? What are your thoughts? Cheers, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org

Re: size of long on all supported arches

2024-04-19 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) If anyone wants to test, I've included patch in commit: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=89e4a1f2c1d1997b8414e2e648c7b4b7c829b63e Nuno Teixeira escreveu (sexta, 19/04/2024 à(s) 08:29): > Hello all, > > I'm testing a fix for tests on a R port (math/R-cran-Rcpp

R: size of long on all supported arches

2024-04-19 Thread Nuno Teixeira
bit supported systems? Upstream are sugesting using OS agnostic check to fix test, so, any better approach or sugestion is welcome. Thanks :) -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: multimedia/webcamd future

2024-04-18 Thread Nuno Teixeira
hard Froehlich escreveu (quinta, 18/04/2024 à(s) 12:35): > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:24:52 +0200 *Nuno Teixeira > >* wrote --- > > Hello all, > > multimedia/webcamd port and upstream is unmaintained and I'm looking for > similar programs but at same time worried about

multimedia/webcamd future

2024-04-17 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello all, multimedia/webcamd port and upstream is unmaintained and I'm looking for similar programs but at same time worried about the future of webcamd. Any help on this matter? Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: Multiple new R ports

2024-04-02 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello Einer, Thanks for waiting and nice that you joined https://reviews.freebsd.org/D44592 . Hope that this week we get all R ports on tree. Cheers, Einar Bjarni Halldórsson escreveu (terça, 19/03/2024 à(s) 13:20): > > > On 19 Mar 2024, at 12:41, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > >

Re: Multiple new R ports

2024-03-19 Thread Nuno Teixeira
t; changes went in, along with > the updated dependencies. > > Should I attempt to revert the changes and update the diff again, or is there > another simple way to just revert > last changes? > > .einar -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: Multiple new R ports

2024-03-19 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Ok, I'll commit it. There's a missing dependency that needs to be added to fix build. You should have received an e-mail from review. Cheers Einar Bjarni Halldórsson escreveu (terça, 19/03/2024 à(s) 10:54): > > > > On 19 Mar 2024, at 10:49, Nuno Teixeira wr

Re: Multiple new R ports

2024-03-19 Thread Nuno Teixeira
y in R ports. Cheers, Einar Bjarni Halldórsson escreveu (terça, 19/03/2024 à(s) 08:41): > > Hi Nuno, > > > On 19 Mar 2024, at 08:14, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > > I'm ready to test ports. > > Just to organize myself, which ones are the three primary ports? &g

Re: Multiple new R ports

2024-03-19 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) D44074 is ready to commit. I will start from there. Nuno Teixeira escreveu (terça, 19/03/2024 à(s) 08:14): > > Hello, > > I'm ready to test ports. > Just to organize myself, which ones are the three primary ports? > > @Gleb Popov could you join review a

Re: Multiple new R ports

2024-03-19 Thread Nuno Teixeira
QLITE than is in ports, I have another PR about updating > it. > > The two PR: > - https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277715 > - https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277716 > > The two diffs in review: > - https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43735 > -

Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken [port building configuration notes]

2024-03-10 Thread Nuno Teixeira
default options in the past because I was concerned about it affects testports. But, I need to give it a go, because build times are impressive. Thanks! -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: Port tree linter

2024-03-03 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Really nice! I will wait until it gets added to tree to try it out. Cheers, Hubert Tournier escreveu (domingo, 3/03/2024 à(s) 11:48): > > Le 03/03/2024 à 09:22, Nuno Teixeira a écrit : > > Is there plans to add it to our ports tree? > Seems that we don't have PNU deps porte

Re: Port tree linter

2024-03-03 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(with a possible Denial of Service risk, should a file > system be saturated!). > > If there's another simpler way, I would be happy to know about it. > > Best regards, > > Hubert > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: Multiple new R ports

2024-02-24 Thread Nuno Teixeira
): > > > > On 24 Feb 2024, at 06:24, Einar Bjarni Halldórsson wrote: > > > >> On 22 Feb 2024, at 11:43, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > >> > >> I did take a look at review and noticed that TEST_DEPENDS are not used > >> and that could means that test target wor

Re: Multiple new R ports

2024-02-22 Thread Nuno Teixeira
evision on our Phabricator. > >> > > Thanks. I created a revision in Phabricator for all the ports. We’ll see > > how it goes. If needed, I can chop it up into multiple revisions. > > > > .einar > > > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: multimedia/plexmediaserver-plexpass committer please

2024-02-18 Thread Nuno Teixeira
equest?? > > 276735 – multimedia/plexmediaserver-plexpass: Update to 1.400.7775 > (freebsd.org) > > Thank you, > > Ben Shertenlieb > Port Maintainer -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: libX changed its libnameA.h to libnameB.h

2024-02-17 Thread Nuno Teixeira
NSGIF_OK'? 101 | if (code != GIF_OK) { | ^~ | NSGIF_OK I will see if lib have some kind of compability with old version and if not I will disable this port option and put it as broken. Moin Rahman escreveu (sábado, 17/02/2024 à(s) 08:46): > &

Re: libX changed its libnameA.h to libnameB.h

2024-02-17 Thread Nuno Teixeira
.. In that case, consumers should change to support it. Cheers, Moin Rahman escreveu (sábado, 17/02/2024 à(s) 08:11): > > > > > On Feb 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I'm facing a build error causes from graph

libX changed its libnameA.h to libnameB.h

2024-02-17 Thread Nuno Teixeira
~~~ 1 error generated. While I'm looking from upstream recomendation on fix, how do I quick fix it? Is it possible to rename libnsgif.h -> nsgif.h in source code? Also googling about this issue didn't get results since most img pkgs do not have this lib default on. Thanks, -- Nun

Re: Firefox failing at startup (was Re: firefox LTO compile fails)

2024-02-14 Thread Nuno Teixeira
à(s) 09:49): > > On 14/02/24 10:38, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Is there any clues why I have it running ok on amd64 and not on aarch64? > > Both running 15 with couple days diff. > > This is strange, but it could have to do with some other port having > been updated or n

Re: Firefox failing at startup (was Re: firefox LTO compile fails)

2024-02-14 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Is there any clues why I have it running ok on amd64 and not on aarch64? Both running 15 with couple days diff. Stefan Ehmann escreveu (terça, 13/02/2024 à(s) 21:42): > > On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 9:58:54 PM CET Guido Falsi wrote: > > On 13/02/24 15:23, Nuno Teixeira wrote: >

firefox LTO compile fails

2024-02-13 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ig/rules.mk:541: libnssckbi.so] Error 1 Same error on 15-CURRENT. Logs: https://people.freebsd.org/~eduardo/logs/firefox/LTO/15amd64_firefox-123.0_1%2C2.log https://people.freebsd.org/~eduardo/logs/firefox/LTO/140amd64_firefox-123.0_1%2C2.log Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: port shares same binary and manual names with base ztest (ZFS)

2024-02-09 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello! I've e-mailed upstream about it and this is getting interesting. I will paste complete reply here. ## Hello Nuno, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > I'm about to maintain Zutils FreeBSD port ( > https://www.freshports.org/archivers/zutils/ ) and I'm dealing with > conf

Re: port shares same binary and manual names with base ztest (ZFS)

2024-02-08 Thread Nuno Teixeira
STALL= gzip # bin/zcat bin/zcmp bin/zdiff bin/zgrep man/man1/ztest.1.gz and 2- ZFS ztest What's your opinion to introduce this change? Cheers, Tomoaki AOKI escreveu (quinta, 1/02/2024 à(s) 14:05): > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:06:15 + > Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > Hel

Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang

2024-02-08 Thread Nuno Teixeira
(...) This conversation related to "compiler:c++11-lang" on lang/gcc14-devel Nuno Teixeira escreveu (quinta, 8/02/2024 à(s) 10:00): > Ok, let's try other way: > > Suppose that port compiles with c++17. Do you need to set > "compiler:c++17-lang' capabilit

Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang

2024-02-08 Thread Nuno Teixeira
ated? It's essential to figure out the compiler type and version, if > you need that in a port Makefile! > > How are you going to do that otherwise? If you don't set USES=compiler, at > the least, COMPILER_TYPE and _VERSION aren't even defined... > > -Dim

Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang

2024-02-07 Thread Nuno Teixeira
&& __u2) > END QUOTE > > is because C++11 did not have pair constructors being constexpr. > C++14 (and later) does. Yet lang/gcc14-devel 's Makefile says: > > USES= compiler:c++11-lang cpe gmake iconv libtool makeinfo perl5 > tar:xz > > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > > > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

port shares same binary and manual names with base ztest (ZFS)

2024-02-01 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello all, archivers/ztools shares binary ztest and manual ztest.1 with base ZFS. Is there a policy to deal with it? If someone knows a port that shares same issue, please let me know. /usr/bin/ztest /usr/share/man/man1/ztest.1.gz PREFIX/bin/ztest PREFIX/man/man1/ztest.1.gz Thanks, -- Nuno

Re: LDFLAGS= -pthread situation

2024-01-29 Thread Nuno Teixeira
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:27:02 + > Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > Hello all! > > > > I was updating games/exult-devel and I found that build failed with: > > > > ld: error: undefined symbol: pthread_create > > >>> referenced by LowLevelMidi

LDFLAGS= -pthread situation

2024-01-29 Thread Nuno Teixeira
d to a upstream change about threading support from C++11... Using LDFLAGS= -pthread fixed build and it is present in lot of ports. My question is if upstream could do anything to avoid this LDFLAGS addition. This is being discussed at https://github.com/exult/exult/issues/436 Any sugestions are

Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man

2024-01-22 Thread Nuno Teixeira
> The ports I'm interested in should have GNU_CONFIGURE=yes kno Just a doubt: For ports like: GNU_CONFIGURE= yes PLIST_FILES= man/man1/portname.1.gz Should we wait for Mk changes or use GNU_CONFIGURE_MANPREFIX= ${PREFIX}/share now? Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: www/webkit-gtk{3,4}: Flavorize: 4.0, 4.1 and 6.0 APIs

2023-12-29 Thread Nuno Teixeira
: > Sorry for offtopic: I maintain my own webkit port: > https://github.com/shamazmazum/freebsd-ports/tree/master/www > > Do you know if the patch mentioned there is actually needed for new > versions? > > вс, 24 дек. 2023 г. в 15:29, Nuno Teixeira : > >> Hello all, >&g

www/webkit-gtk{3,4}: Flavorize: 4.0, 4.1 and 6.0 APIs

2023-12-24 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello all, I'm working on webkit-gtk port and looking for sugestions on how this update/flavorize should be. Any help is welcome at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275914 Thanks! -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Upstream "separated go module for ", how to build

2023-12-10 Thread Nuno Teixeira
I remember this happening in other ports... Any tips are welcome. Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Optimizing CRAN sites logic between current and old/archive versions

2023-12-09 Thread Nuno Teixeira
las.iastate.edu/CRAN/%SUBDIR%/ \ https://cran.ma.imperial.ac.uk/%SUBDIR%/ \ https://cran.ism.ac.jp/%SUBDIR%/ .endif .if !defined(IGNORE_MASTER_SITE_CRAN_ARCHIVE) MASTER_SITE_CRAN_ARCHIVE+= ${MASTER_SITE_CRAN:S,$,Archive/${PORTNAME}/,} .endif ### Any tips of a better logic for this? Thanks

Re: Best practice to bump consumers portrevision on quarterly

2023-12-07 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello Jan, I can confirm that it worked fine :) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274405 Thanks! Nuno Teixeira escreveu no dia segunda, 27/11/2023 à(s) 12:55: > Hello Jan, > > I'm waiting on 9b214a66ea8788a6da299139decf506a4b4f5ff1 commit to be MFHed > so I

Re: Best practice to bump consumers portrevision on quarterly

2023-11-27 Thread Nuno Teixeira
o dia domingo, 26/11/2023 à(s) 20:29: > Nuno Teixeira writes: > > > Hello, > > > > What is the correct way of bumping consumers in quarterly? > > > > 1. cherry-pick port update > > 2. bump portrevision consumers on quarterly directly? > > Cherry-pick b

Re: Best practice to bump consumers portrevision on quarterly

2023-11-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
t/?id=03eac77c103b637b316d6a73df7cae01986402cf Now I'm in doubt how should I commit it to quarterly. Thanks, Mathieu Arnold escreveu no dia domingo, 26/11/2023 à(s) 09:19: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:30:21AM +, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What is the correct way of bumping co

  1   2   3   4   >