poudriere-devel-3.4.99.20250209 main Using bulk on *existing* repo it loops on both go121 and 123 and also nvidia. Repeat process and same.
Since that repo was build *without* PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes, I cleaned (pkgclean -A) it and I'm building it from scratch at the moment. When it's ready, I will repeat bulk (without updating ports tree) and check results. Thanks [00:00:51] [02] [00:00:00] Warning: go123-1.23.5 will be rebuilt as it misses libc.so.6:32 [00:00:51] [02] [00:00:00] Building lang/go123 | go123-1.23.5: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase [00:00:52] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1: determining shlib requirements [00:00:52] [01] [00:00:00] Warning: go121-1.21.13_1 will be rebuilt as it misses libc.so.6:32 [00:00:52] [01] [00:00:00] Building lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase Guido Falsi <m...@madpilot.net> escreveu (domingo, 2/02/2025 à(s) 08:04): > On 02/02/25 09:02, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Le 1 février 2025 23:36:12 GMT+01:00, Guido Falsi <m...@madpilot.net> a > écrit : > >> On 01/02/25 22:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>>> On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>>>> On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: > >>>>>> On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > >>>>>>> Hello Rainer, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After > all, he has > >>>>>>> > worked intensively on the pkg updates. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes it is. I'm CC'ing bapt@. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Since this issue was pestering me while testing multiple ports with > >>>>>> unnecessarily lengthy rebuilds I took a look. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have posted a pull request for poudriere [1] with a > fix/workaround that > >>>>>> works for me and allows me to have a functional build machine. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm not sure if this fix is completely correct, but maybe it can be > useful > >>>>>> to other people as a work around. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Guido Falsi <m...@madpilot.net> > >>>>> > >>>>> at quick glance it sounds like a bug in pkg I ll have a look at it > next week > >>>>> > >>>>> Bapt > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> After deeper analysis, I figure pkg is right and each time it claims > a need for > >>>> After a deeper analysis: > >>>> 32bits libs, they are actually needed. for reported ports, I think the > >>>> PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes does not work yet with newer pkg version. > >>>> > >>>> I have found while analysing to potential bug at pkg install time for > people not > >>>> using pkgbase, which I will work on fixing, not nothing wrong > regarding the :32 > >>>> handling at pkg build time (aka what you face in poudriere). > >>>> > >>>> I may be wrong, but I am not sure I am. > >>>> > >>>> For people who haven't notice one of the major change of pkg 2.x is > tracking 32 > >>>> bit libraries (and potentially linux one, off for now) AND tracking > base > >>>> libraries always. > >>>> > >>>> After a deeper analysis: > >>>> My understanding if poudriere with PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes would > work ok as > >>>> if, if the building jail was built using pkgbase. > >>>> > >>>> What poudriere lacks for the options if gathering base libaries to > consider them > >>>> as provided. > >>>> > >>>> Note that pkg at runtime if not running on a system install using > pkgbase, will > >>>> scan for base libraries. (Note this is where I found the bug I am > interesting > >>>> in: it does not scan for 32bit libraries yet, which make pkg check -d > unhappy) > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> Bapt > >>>> > >>> > >>> And I was wrong about the pkg install bug, we do scan for 32bit > livraries, so > >>> everything should be fine. > >> > >> Bapt, thanks for the analysis. > >> > >> SO I gather I need to rebuild my jails from scratch, possibly from > pkgbase, but I'm not sure what I can do about my head jail which I build > from source, and do also use to generate pkgbase packages for my > desktops/laptop etc. > >> > >> Or maybe I'm completely missing the point. > >> > > > > I will look into making poudriere support this properly next week > > Thanks a lot for your work on all this! > > -- > Guido Falsi <m...@madpilot.net> > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: <edua...@freebsd.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org
