[Just a resend with a corrected email address.]
On 2022-Jan-24, at 22:05, Mark Millard wrote:
I've been experimenting with WITH_DEBUG= port builds via
poudriere-devel --including some testing of bulk -a .
For something like devel/llvm13 the .pkg file generated is
huge (multi-GiBytes) and takes
On 2022-01-24 10:16, Chris wrote:
On 2022-01-24 10:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:29:45AM -0800, Chris wrote:
On 2022-01-24 03:00, Daniel Engberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to chime in on Alexander's (netchild@) mail and I fully agree.
> Looking at base we already
I've been experimenting with WITH_DEBUG= port builds via
poudriere-devel --including some testing of bulk -a .
For something like devel/llvm13 the .pkg file generated is
huge (multi-GiBytes) and takes more time to produce than
the rest of the llvm13 build did. This is with that being
the only acti
Pau Amma writes:
> o/~
> Whatever became of anki?
> Has anyone heard of it?
> Is it broken? Ignored?
> Perhaps deprecated?
> Is a dependency
> Broken?
> o/~
Seems fine. FreshPorts nowadays provides package availability table.
https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:12:amd64/latest/All/anki-2.1.48_3.pkg
>
> From: Dmitry Morozovsky
> Sent: Mon Jan 24 20:45:11 CET 2022
> To:
> Subject: sed trouble when UNAME_* is set in jail (fwd)
>
> I have a jail on my build system, nested-built on a previous major; on the
> case, it's stable/10; for a poudriere, it is d
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > [...] Tho I must admit I find @bapt's recent tcp proposal an
> > interesting and appealing idea. :-)
>
> The proposal is now in anyway ;)
That was fast; excellent service, sir! I now have even more reason to
upgrade my ancient server (FTP is
Sorry for resend colleagues, seem to lost my subscription list
--
Sincerely,
D.Marck[DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:ma...@freebsd.org ]
On 2022-01-24 10:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:29:45AM -0800, Chris wrote:
On 2022-01-24 03:00, Daniel Engberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to chime in on Alexander's (netchild@) mail and I fully agree.
> Looking at base we already have a lot of contrib and since we
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:29:45AM -0800, Chris wrote:
> On 2022-01-24 03:00, Daniel Engberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wanted to chime in on Alexander's (netchild@) mail and I fully agree.
> > Looking at base we already have a lot of contrib and since we need to
> > adapt each
> > software pro
On 2022-01-24 03:00, Daniel Engberg wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to chime in on Alexander's (netchild@) mail and I fully agree.
Looking at base we already have a lot of contrib and since we need to adapt
each
software project to our build framework a lot tends to get dated quickly and
currently is
Isn't that just reinventing libfetch which is already in the base install?
Cheers,
Freddie
Typos due to smartphone keyboard.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:46:39PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
> On 24.01.22 09:12, Chris wrote:
> > On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I did not really have an opinion on this, since we never used FTP,
> > > but I was a bit surprised by the suggestion to use SS
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On 24.01.22 10:56, Helge Oldach wrote:
Jose Quinteiro wrote on Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:40:03 +0100 (CET):
On 1/23/22 13:12, Helge Oldach wrote:
Stefan Esser wrote on Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:08:30 +0100 (CET):
Am 23.01.22 um 18:12 schrieb Jose Quinteiro:
On 1/23/22 09:06, tech-lists wrote:
On Sun, Ja
On 24.01.22 09:12, Chris wrote:
On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi all,
I did not really have an opinion on this, since we never used FTP,
but I was a bit surprised by the suggestion to use SSH instead.
It never occurred to us that anything but HTTP(S) was possible.
We simply run
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:11:52PM +0100, Rosenke wrote:
>
>
> On 21.01.22 19:49, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > 17 janv. 2022 16:22:31 Rosenke :
> >
> > > On 17.01.22 16:20, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 04:17:46PM +0100, Rosenke wrote:
> > > > > On 17.01.22 16:12, Ro
On 21.01.22 19:49, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
17 janv. 2022 16:22:31 Rosenke :
On 17.01.22 16:20, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 04:17:46PM +0100, Rosenke wrote:
On 17.01.22 16:12, Rosenke wrote:
On 13.01.22 13:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:33
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:10:11PM +, Vincent Hoffman-Kazlauskas wrote:
>
>
> On 24/01/2022 08:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:12:20AM -0800, Chris wrote:
> > > On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
>
>
>
> > >
> >
> > based o
On 24/01/2022 08:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:12:20AM -0800, Chris wrote:
On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi all,
based on the discussion I am adding right now, a new protocol: tcp:// which uses
the protocol we made on top of ssh way simple
Hi,
I just wanted to chime in on Alexander's (netchild@) mail and I fully
agree. Looking at base we already have a lot of contrib and since we
need to adapt each software project to our build framework a lot tends
to get dated quickly and currently is so I don't see the benefit
importing more
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:12:20AM -0800, Chris wrote:
> On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I did not really have an opinion on this, since we never used FTP,
> > but I was a bit surprised by the suggestion to use SSH instead.
> >
> > It never occurred to us that an
On 2022-01-23 23:06, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting "Patrick M. Hausen" (from Sun, 23 Jan 2022
19:19:57 +0100):
Am 22.01.2022 um 09:35 schrieb Chris :
I find it's less "housekeeping" to use ftp(1) setup through inetd(8) for
pkg repos, than
via ssh.
I understand the appeal of FTP.
Ma
On 2022-01-23 12:08, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 23.01.22 um 18:12 schrieb Jose Quinteiro:
On 1/23/22 09:06, tech-lists wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 08:55:09AM -0800, Jose Quinteiro wrote:
You can run HTTP on a non-standard port. For example, 8080 is commonly
used. As an added bonus, this means
On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi all,
I did not really have an opinion on this, since we never used FTP,
but I was a bit surprised by the suggestion to use SSH instead.
It never occurred to us that anything but HTTP(S) was possible.
We simply run Nginx in a jail serving the pack
24 matches
Mail list logo
