On 2022-01-23 10:19, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi all,

I did not really have an opinion on this, since we never used FTP,
but I was a bit surprised by the suggestion to use SSH instead.

It never occurred to us that anything but HTTP(S) was possible.
We simply run Nginx in a jail serving the packages that Poudriere
produces for us. Setup time/effort: 5 minutes.

Now after this comment:

Am 22.01.2022 um 09:35 schrieb Chris <portmas...@bsdforge.com>:
I find it's less "housekeeping" to use ftp(1) setup through inetd(8) for pkg repos, than
via ssh.

I understand the appeal of FTP.
Maybe this discussion is focusing on the wrong topic. Perhaps
we should consider including a light weight way to serve HTTP(S)
in base? Like Lighttpd, which as far as I know comes with a BSD
3-clause equivalent license.

But then the general tendency has been to remove network services
from base rather than introduce them. Like e.g. BIND.

So I really have no idea what the general opinion is, just wanted
to throw in that IMHO HTTPS is the best protocol to the task and
if some way to serve that could be included in base, I for one would
appreciate that.

OTOH Chris, what's keeping you from installing a web server just
serving static files?
Different environments/ different requirements. But habit as much as anything else. Ftp is trivial, has always been available. So I never even need to think about it. I perform mass installs/upgrades in large networks. There is no overhead using ftp
either through a one-start | inetd. The clients are all started/used at will.
It seems to me that removing features also removes value. IMHO the gain from the
removal of transports as trivial as ftp(1) bring little to the table for all
concerned. But that's just me. :-)

-- Chris

Kind regards,
Patrick
--
punkt.de GmbH
Patrick M. Hausen
.infrastructure

Kaiserallee 13a
76133 Karlsruhe

Tel. +49 721 9109500

https://infrastructure.punkt.de
i...@punkt.de

AG Mannheim 108285
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian Stein

Attachment: 0xBDE49540.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Reply via email to