On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > [...] Tho I must admit I find @bapt's recent tcp proposal an > > interesting and appealing idea. :-) > > The proposal is now in anyway ;)
That was fast; excellent service, sir! I now have even more reason to upgrade my ancient server (FTP is forbidden on my LAN; SSH was trivial to set up). > I am just struggling on the name of the scheme: tcp:// or pkg+tcp:// > (with a rename of ssh into pkg+ssh:// :D) I'm only a minnow here, but that "+" looks pretty ugly; are there any other methods that contain a "+" symbol? It looks like a sort of a port variant (in MacOS terms, which I also use). -- Dave