Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-09 Thread ಓಂ
even in the mistakes I own up every action and am ready for anything that comes my way... and.. i am too learning ... didn't I say that few days back? thanks for your help where it helped me, even though you will know it how! bye for now... -- ___

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-09 Thread ಓಂ
First of all thanks you for sending some relevant links... I myself wanted to end this thread in my last mail to the list .. iwanted to make sure it happens in good spirit and in a lively way.. Many of your observation about my communication here are likely to be wrong but let's not discuss that.

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-09 Thread Devendra Laulkar
Hi, > if a simple question asking information like this > can start a > religious war then either religion (whichever that > religion maybe) is > not mature, and is fickle or at-least war mongerrors > have not > understood their religion well. Or maybe people incite more irrelevant discussion

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-09 Thread Aditya Laghate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ಓಂ wrote: > I was trying to find a single simple *word* used for baby penguins. > So i gave a background information sort of preamble to why i was > asking that question. How can i be responsible for what people take > that information for? Sir, Fir

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-09 Thread ಓಂ
I was trying to find a single simple *word* used for baby penguins. So i gave a background information sort of preamble to why i was asking that question. How can i be responsible for what people take that information for? The question i faced was in the process of converting a possible windows i

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-09 Thread Aditya Godbole
On Nov 6, 2007 10:10 AM, ಓಂ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in my opinion this list is one of the **most** appropriate places to > seek information about Linux (and it's mascot)! With all due respect, you are missing the whole point here. The Linux mascot is not a *real* penguin. It never has had

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-06 Thread Manas Alekar
Hi Flaming Mongrels, Let us stop behaving like a pack of wolves and try to co-operate. Those who do not want to target a particular person as particularly irksome should use filters. Please engage in constructive activities. Please. The person being targeted in this thread and on the list in gen

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread Aditya Laghate
On 11/6/07, ಓಂ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am currently studying the CC licenses... > > Person who gave PLUG it's mascot did not ask anything in return.. did > not specify any license.. > > he can be seen at http://www.flickr.com/photos/guruvision/ > > he does not want his work to be released un

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread ಓಂ
I am currently studying the CC licenses... Person who gave PLUG it's mascot did not ask anything in return.. did not specify any license.. he can be seen at http://www.flickr.com/photos/guruvision/ he does not want his work to be released under any specific license... (rather he wants his photo

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread Devendra Laulkar
Hi, > All of this calling my writing as troll would be > unnecessary if you do either.. > 1. change the MoA to correct name *Pune Linux Users > Groups* as *Pune > Gnu/Linux Users' Group* > OR > 2. Stop portraying the title of the **Pune Linux > Users' Group** as > **Pune Gnu/Linux Users' Group**

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread ಓಂ
On Nov 6, 2007 1:47 AM, Kaustubh Gadkari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 5, 2007 10:56 AM, ಓಂ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I am eager to learn how I can > > teach kids about **Linux** and any personal learning in that effort is > > *not* waste for me... > > Never said it was. My point was, thi

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread Kaustubh Gadkari
On Nov 5, 2007 10:56 AM, ಓಂ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > alright let's discuss FREEDUC under the same thread !! > > will that make it on-topic for you? On *this* thread? No. On a new thread, yes. >I am eager to learn how I can > teach kids about **Linux** and any personal learning in that effort

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread ಓಂ
alright let's discuss FREEDUC under the same thread !! will that make it on-topic for you? I am eager to learn how I can teach kids about **Linux** and any personal learning in that effort is *not* waste for me... i also know that generalizing what you don't like as *troll* is a common tactic us

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread Kaustubh Gadkari
On Nov 5, 2007 9:52 AM, ಓಂ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All of this calling my writing as troll would be unnecessary if you do either. > Not all of your writing. Just this thread in particular. > 1. change the MoA to correct name *Pune Linux Users Groups* as *Pune > Gnu/Linux Users' Group* > OR >

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread ಓಂ
All of this calling my writing as troll would be unnecessary if you do either.. 1. change the MoA to correct name *Pune Linux Users Groups* as *Pune Gnu/Linux Users' Group* OR 2. Stop portraying the title of the **Pune Linux Users' Group** as **Pune Gnu/Linux Users' Group** By not doing either, y

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread Kaustubh Gadkari
On Nov 5, 2007 1:43 AM, ಓಂ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.plug.org.in/plugmemo.php > > Does not have a word F/OSS in it. > From the MoA, Objects of the Society : * Educating the society at large about Linux and GNU. * Funding such or similar projects having similar objects.

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread Devendra Laulkar
Hi, > http://www.plug.org.in/plugmemo.php > Does not have a word F/OSS in it. > Shall we treat F/OSS also off-topic on plug mailing > list? Please refer to http://www.plug.org.in/mailinglist.php Sometime back, we had a complaint that PLUG mailing list rules were too "restrictive". However, when

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-05 Thread ಓಂ
http://www.plug.org.in/plugmemo.php Does not have a word F/OSS in it. Shall we treat F/OSS also off-topic on plug mailing list? -- __ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in) List Information: http:

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-04 Thread Kaustubh Gadkari
> I felt this is likely to be a slang and hence did not attempt to > search on net (which i will do in parallel) > > The subject came up while discussing Linux and hence the querry... > And it is off-topic on this list. It has nothing to do with F/OSS. If it does, please explain what baby kangaroo

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-04 Thread Rahul Sundaram
ಓಂ wrote: a friend (more like a teacher) asked me a question related to penguin and how they rear their off-springs.. I could not answer maybe somebody here will be able to help.. He said baby kangaroo in a mother's stomuch pouch is called "joy" Oh btw, it is "joey", not joy. Rahul -- __

Re: [PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-04 Thread Rahul Sundaram
ಓಂ wrote: a friend (more like a teacher) asked me a question related to penguin and how they rear their off-springs.. I could not answer maybe somebody here will be able to help.. He said baby kangaroo in a mother's stomuch pouch is called "joy" he asked is there a similar word for baby Penguin

[PLUG] techically OT but not..

2007-11-04 Thread ಓಂ
a friend (more like a teacher) asked me a question related to penguin and how they rear their off-springs.. I could not answer maybe somebody here will be able to help.. He said baby kangaroo in a mother's stomuch pouch is called "joy" he asked is there a similar word for baby Penguins (which i b