On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ഓം wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram
>> < wrote:
>>>
>>> ഓം wrote:
Whosoever calls for *clear separation* (i think) has a burden upon
self to define what is *clear* and what is
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Desi Penguin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I happened to look at one at croma store in Ishanya mall. I was
> impressed.
I have one. It is kick ass. It comes with a customized version of
Xandros. All the components work in the installed OS - no driver
issues. Asus has announced
ഓം wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram
> < wrote:
>> ഓം wrote:
>>> Whosoever calls for *clear separation* (i think) has a burden upon
>>> self to define what is *clear* and what is *separation* and also what
>>> is *clear separation* as it applies to the work giving enough
>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ഓം wrote:
>>
>> Whosoever calls for *clear separation* (i think) has a burden upon
>> self to define what is *clear* and what is *separation* and also what
>> is *clear separation* as it applies to the work giving enoug
ഓം wrote:
>
> Whosoever calls for *clear separation* (i think) has a burden upon
> self to define what is *clear* and what is *separation* and also what
> is *clear separation* as it applies to the work giving enough
> examples on both the sides...
I am not calling for "clear separation". I am
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Rahul Sundaram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ഓം wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर wrote:
The kernel is GPLed, but the firmware may not be.
>>>
>>> There is in fact a pote
ഓം wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर wrote:
>>> The kernel is GPLed, but the firmware may not be.
>> There is in fact a potential license violation here. Refer "mere
>> aggregation" clauses in the license.
>>
>> Rahul
>
>
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर wrote:
>> The kernel is GPLed, but the firmware may not be.
>
> There is in fact a potential license violation here. Refer "mere
> aggregation" clauses in the license.
>
> Rahul
There is either a vio
Hello,
I happened to look at one at croma store in Ishanya mall. I was impressed.
Please share your experience if you own one.
Is the price justified ?
Other comments also welcome
-DP
--
On the internet, no one knows you are a penguin
--
___
श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This topic has numerous aspects e.g. an open firmware allows to boost powers
> of wireless signals which violates FCC mandates and can cause problems.
You are confining yourself to wireless firmware and FCC has hardly
global jurisdiction and there is no cl
Thanks for the update.. just a thought :-) that anybody following
commitment would have called it Libre-Linux...
without showing any flexibility what-so-ever in terminology
*Termina*ting this comment *logi*cally :-)
Next time you clean my car, don't forget to remove the non-free
eng
http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/20801/
Also see, "Vendors are bad for Security"
http://www.links.org/?p=327
-- Quote --
/I’ve ranted about this at length before, I’m sure - even in print, in
O’Reily’s Open Sources 2. But now Debian have proved me right (again)
beyond my wildest expecta
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:33:13 Arun Khan wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 May 2008, श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर wrote:
> ... snip ...
>
> > The kernel is GPLed, but the firmware may not be.
> The purists would have us less mortals go look for *all* components in
> our systems that have open source drivers, fir
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, श्रीधर नारायण दैठणकर wrote:
... snip ...
>
> The kernel is GPLed, but the firmware may not be.
The purists would have us less mortals go look for *all* components in
our systems that have open source drivers, firmware et al.
My 2 paise.
-- Arun Khan
--
___
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, sudhanwa Jogalekar wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Linux Lingam
> Date: Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:49 AM
> Subject: [ilugd] linux-libre kernel. fork?
> To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> dear all,
>
> dr g nagarjuna of fsfindi
Hi,
This topic has numerous aspects e.g. an open firmware allows to boost powers
of wireless signals which violates FCC mandates and can cause problems. Other
than burrying it in binary blob(worse than a hex dump), there is no other
effective measure.
More importantly, tainted kernels are ille
Forwarded message:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Linux Lingam
Date: Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:49 AM
Subject: [ilugd] linux-libre kernel. fork?
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dear all,
dr g nagarjuna of fsfindia.org was in delhi tuesday,
we met for coffee and
17 matches
Mail list logo
