On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ഓം wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram >> < wrote: >>> >>> ഓം wrote: >>>> >>>> Whosoever calls for *clear separation* (i think) has a burden upon >>>> self to define what is *clear* and what is *separation* and also what >>>> is *clear separation* as it applies to the work giving enough >>>> examples on both the sides... >>> >>> I am not calling for "clear separation". I am merely explaining to you >>> the >>> implication of the license. For further details, you should actually read >>> the license itself especially the sections regarding derived work and >>> relevant copyright laws. >>> >>> Rahul >>> >> >> I think you are refering to copyleft laws while arguing... > > There is no such thing as "copyleft" laws. So no, I am not referring to > anything like that. > > Rahul
:-) if there is a smiley to represent (p)silence... -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
