Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-16 Thread Josh Triplett
Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 08.10.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Julian Andres Klode: > > I'm wondering if it makes sense to have some sort of systemd > > meta package. I recently wondered very long where machinectl > > was when I wanted to try machinectl shell... > > We added machinectl to the package descri

Re: Bumping dbus depends (Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump))

2015-10-14 Thread Simon McVittie
On 14/10/15 14:21, Michael Biebl wrote: > CCed Simon for this thoughts on this. Maybe it's too early to move the > policy files around Please keep policy files in /etc/dbus-1/s*.d until I work out what needs to be done to make it safe to move them. S

Re: Bumping dbus depends (Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump))

2015-10-14 Thread Martin Pitt
Michael Biebl [2015-10-14 15:21 +0200]: > That's a valid point. I wonder whether we should start moving the policy > files after stretch because of this. > [...] > CCed Simon for this thoughts on this. Maybe it's too early to move the > policy files around I talked to Simon on IRC and already reve

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-14 Thread Martin Pitt
Martin Pitt [2015-10-14 10:39 +0200]: > > > Now that dbus 1.10 is in testing, we can actually move them to > > > /usr/share. \o/ > > > > Wow, cool, that's great. > > Done: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=5daf857 Bad news, I had to revert this (and the cor

Re: Bumping dbus depends (Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump))

2015-10-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 14.10.2015 um 14:48 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > On 14 October 2015 at 08:41, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 14.10.2015 um 10:39 schrieb Martin Pitt: >>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=5daf857 >>> >>> Although this is really a tangent to this thread, as there are o

Bumping dbus depends (Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump))

2015-10-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 14 October 2015 at 08:41, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 14.10.2015 um 10:39 schrieb Martin Pitt: >> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=5daf857 >> >> Although this is really a tangent to this thread, as there are other >> conffiles which we can't remove that easily.

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 14.10.2015 um 10:39 schrieb Martin Pitt: > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=5daf857 > > Although this is really a tangent to this thread, as there are other > conffiles which we can't remove that easily. Small nit: For systemd, where dbus is only a recommends

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-14 Thread Martin Pitt
Julian Andres Klode [2015-10-13 11:06 +0200]: > > > Nod. Although there will have to be shuffling around of at least all > > > the dbus policies, no? > > > > Now that dbus 1.10 is in testing, we can actually move them to > > /usr/share. \o/ > > Wow, cool, that's great. Done: http://anonscm.de

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 06:19:53AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Felipe Sateler [2015-10-12 20:04 -0300]: > > Nod. Although there will have to be shuffling around of at least all > > the dbus policies, no? > > Now that dbus 1.10 is in testing, we can actually move them to > /usr/share. \o/ Wow, coo

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Felipe Sateler [2015-10-12 20:04 -0300]: > Nod. Although there will have to be shuffling around of at least all > the dbus policies, no? Now that dbus 1.10 is in testing, we can actually move them to /usr/share. \o/ Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Devel

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-12 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 8 October 2015 at 12:50, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 08.10.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Julian Andres Klode: >> I'm wondering if it makes sense to have some sort of systemd >> meta package. I recently wondered very long where machinectl >> was when I wanted to try machinectl shell... > > We added machin

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-08 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 08.10.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Julian Andres Klode: > I'm wondering if it makes sense to have some sort of systemd > meta package. I recently wondered very long where machinectl > was when I wanted to try machinectl shell... We added machinectl to the package description, so it should turn up when

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:55:08AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 7 October 2015 at 09:31, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Afaics, that's about 200K. So yeah, I could live with having those > > shipped in the systemd package. > > > > and bootctl is useful on its > >> own, even for people not using sy

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-08 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 7 October 2015 at 09:31, Michael Biebl wrote: > Afaics, that's about 200K. So yeah, I could live with having those > shipped in the systemd package. > > and bootctl is useful on its >> own, even for people not using systemd-boot (it shows the >> boot configuration). > >> You could keep that in

Re: systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

2015-10-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 07.10.2015 um 14:13 schrieb Julian Andres Klode: > > I thought about this a bit. What we need is basically two things: > > > > > (1) a package installing the bootloader tools and updating the > > bootloader in the ESP > > (2)