On 8 October 2015 at 12:50, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Am 08.10.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Julian Andres Klode: >> I'm wondering if it makes sense to have some sort of systemd >> meta package. I recently wondered very long where machinectl >> was when I wanted to try machinectl shell... > > We added machinectl to the package description, so it should turn up > when running apt-cache search machinectl. We tried to do that for the > other split off package, systemd-journal-remote, as well. > >> Or have a systemd-core package containing only what's needed >> to bring up a system, and make the systemd package larger. > > We discussed that at debconf, making systemd a meta-package depending on > all sub-packages. > > This would have meant shuffling around a lot of conffiles and we were > worried a bit about the upgrade path, so we decided against it back then.
Nod. Although there will have to be shuffling around of at least all the dbus policies, no? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
