On 2 avr. 2014, at 16:27, Mark Rizun wrote:
> That is really wierd:)
>
>
> 2014-04-02 17:17 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben :
> Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:16:
>> The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows (just replace cell for
>> self in two lines before should and shouldnt):
>>
>>
That is really wierd:)
2014-04-02 17:17 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben :
> Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:16:
>
> The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows (just replace cell for
> self in two lines before should and shouldnt):
>
> testCellOnState
> | cell |
> cell := BlankCe
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:16:
The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows
(just replace cell for self in two lines before should and
shouldnt):
testCellOnState
| cell |
The mistake is simple. You have to write as follows (just replace cell for
self in two lines before should and shouldnt):
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell := BlankCell new.
self should: [ cell isOff ].
self shouldnt: [ cell isOn ].
2014-04-02 16:12 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 15:07:
Could you give me the code of test that fails?
I can but I did already.
The code is :
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell := BlankCell new.
cell should: [ cell isOff ].
cell shouldnt: [ cell isOn ].
And this is a code which succeeced
Could you give me the code of test that fails?
2014-04-02 16:05 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben :
> Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 14:58:
>
> Does this test fails to assert something or it throws you some error?
>>
>>
> Like I said earlier it fails with this message:
>
> MessageNotUnderstood: BlankCell
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 14:58:
Does this test fails to assert something or it throws you some error?
Like I said earlier it fails with this message:
MessageNotUnderstood: BlankCell >> should.
Which I find wierd because I use should: also on the other test methods
off BlankCell and n
Does this test fails to assert something or it throws you some error?
2014-04-02 15:27 GMT+03:00 Roelof Wobben :
> Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 14:22:
>
> And only on this method the test fail on should:
>>
>> testCellOnState
>> | cell |
>> cell := BlankCell new.
>> cell s
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 14:22:
And only on this
method the test fail on should:
testCellOnState
| cell |
cell := BlankCell
>
> And only on this method the test fail on should:
>
> testCellOnState
> | cell |
> cell := BlankCell new.
> cell should: [ cell isOff ].
> cell shouldnt: [ cell isOn ].
>
Yes it does, inasmuch on the bottom of this page (
http://squeak.preeminent.org/tut2007/html/017.htm
Mark Rizun schreef op 2-4-2014 13:51:
Hi,
You probably misunderstood the task.
On
the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell
which is a su
Camille Teruel schreef op 2-4-2014
13:40:
On 2 avr. 2014, at 13:21, Roelof Wobben
wrote:
Hello,
On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which
is a su
Hi,
You probably misunderstood the task.
On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which is a
> subclass of TestCase.
>
You had to create the class *BlankCellTestCase* (not BlankCell) which is a
subclass of *TestCase*.
BlankCell and BlankCellTestCase are two different classes.
-B
2014-04-02 13:21 GMT+02:00 Roelof Wobben :
> Hello,
>
> On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which is a
> subclass of TestCase.
> So far no problem.
>
No, firstly, all cells are just subclasses of Object (
http://squeak.preeminent.org/tut2007/html/015.html).
And in step http:
On 2 avr. 2014, at 13:21, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On the first part I have to make a class named BlankCell which is a subclass
> of TestCase.
> So far no problem.
> But when you are on the MirrorCell part BlankCell must be a subclass of Cell.
> But then the tests will fail because s
15 matches
Mail list logo