On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:04:59AM +0800, Pierce Ng wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:39:56AM -0400, David T. Lewis wrote:
> > Yes, that is the correct way to do it.
>
> David,
>
> It seems Command Shell doesn't handle REPL applications like the sqlite3
> shell,
> tclsh and goodsrv. How diffic
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:39:56AM -0400, David T. Lewis wrote:
> Yes, that is the correct way to do it.
David,
It seems Command Shell doesn't handle REPL applications like the sqlite3 shell,
tclsh and goodsrv. How difficult is that to implement, in your view?
Alternatively (unless they are the s
That's perfect, thank you!
Nicolas
On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:39 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> Yes, that is the correct way to do it.
>
> I think that the ConfigurationOfOSProcess for Pharo includes a portion of
> the CommandShell package, so if you load OSProcess from that configuration
> you should
Yes, that is the correct way to do it.
I think that the ConfigurationOfOSProcess for Pharo includes a portion of
the CommandShell package, so if you load OSProcess from that configuration
you should also get the necessary PipeableOSProcess. That said, I would
still encourage you to load the full C
