That's perfect, thank you! Nicolas
On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:39 PM, David T. Lewis <le...@mail.msen.com> wrote: > Yes, that is the correct way to do it. > > I think that the ConfigurationOfOSProcess for Pharo includes a portion of > the CommandShell package, so if you load OSProcess from that configuration > you should also get the necessary PipeableOSProcess. That said, I would > still encourage you to load the full CommandShell package and explore some > of the other things it it :-) > > ConfigurationOfOSProcess and ConfigurationOfCommandShell have both been > recently updated for Pharo. > > Dave > > >> Hi, >> >> I am doing some work with OSProcess and I want to get the output directly >> to pharo (i.e. a stream or a byteString would be cool). >> I have found this on the web >> http://pharo.gemtalksystems.com/book/PharoTools/OSProcess/ where it's said >> that if you want access to the output you have to use PipeableOSProcess >> from CommandShell project. >> My question is: is still this the correct way to do it or meanwhile in >> OSProcess something was implemented to handle this specific case? >> >> Thanks. >> Cheers, >> Nicolas >> > > >
