Yes, that is the correct way to do it. I think that the ConfigurationOfOSProcess for Pharo includes a portion of the CommandShell package, so if you load OSProcess from that configuration you should also get the necessary PipeableOSProcess. That said, I would still encourage you to load the full CommandShell package and explore some of the other things it it :-)
ConfigurationOfOSProcess and ConfigurationOfCommandShell have both been recently updated for Pharo. Dave > Hi, > > I am doing some work with OSProcess and I want to get the output directly > to pharo (i.e. a stream or a byteString would be cool). > I have found this on the web > http://pharo.gemtalksystems.com/book/PharoTools/OSProcess/ where it's said > that if you want access to the output you have to use PipeableOSProcess > from CommandShell project. > My question is: is still this the correct way to do it or meanwhile in > OSProcess something was implemented to handle this specific case? > > Thanks. > Cheers, > Nicolas >
