Le 29/12/2015 13:18, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
> If you're on Mac/Linux. Windows is another story.
>
Hi,
since Pillar 1.0.0 the only difference is that Pillar doesn't generate a
Windows script to compile the .tex into pdf.
Else Pillar should works on Windows.
> Cheers
Hi,
On 29/12/15 06:01, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
I think in case of Pillar makes sense to create something in Pharo
because the existing solutions are not that powerful anyway with the
notable exception of Latex which is something that Pillar can use and
inline anyway. Personally I love Pilla
I am a huge supporter of Pharo being directly connected to the outside
world and not just recreate (I wont use the term "reinvent the wheel"
because I was always found it a stupid remark anyway) something that it
exists out there without an obvious advantage. However it makes sense in
many cases be
On Pon, 2015-12-28 at 21:41 -0500, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
> Skeletons go beyond themes (grav also have them). They're like
> mini-sites ready to be filled out with your own content.
Like demo-sites or with empty slots to add content?
> The fact that I don't need to compile the sit
On 28/12/15 13:28, Saša Janiška wrote:
On Pon, 2015-12-28 at 11:09 -0500, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
but themes, skeletons and interactivity. (Details in the referred blog
post).
I agree that there could be more themes available, although I'm not 100%
sure I understand what is spec
On 28/12/15 17:05, stepharo wrote:
Yes, that is true. That is a cost of a smaller community. But the
problem here is that your solution creates a self fulfilling
situation. If everybody who comes to Pharo is encouraged to use tools
outside of Pharo rather than using, improving and extending
Yes, that is true. That is a cost of a smaller community. But the
problem here is that your solution creates a self fulfilling
situation. If everybody who comes to Pharo is encouraged to use tools
outside of Pharo rather than using, improving and extending the tools
in Pharo. Then the communi
On Pon, 2015-12-28 at 12:19 -0600, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
> There are so many advantages to using tools in Pharo when using
> Pharo.
I agree with it and that's why I asked what might be some advantages of
using Pillar as documentation tool.
> Do we now adopt yet another language, environment, e
On Pon, 2015-12-28 at 18:03 +0100, stepharo wrote:
Hello Stef,
> have a look at Pillar and you can add footnotes and we will review
> your code and integrate it.
Don't you think it's too early for me to add such feature. ;)
> We are just really busy right now.
Don't worry. I tried Pillar, but
On Pon, 2015-12-28 at 11:09 -0500, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
> but themes, skeletons and interactivity. (Details in the referred blog
> post).
I agree that there could be more themes available, although I'm not 100%
sure I understand what is special about grav's skeleton's since it see
On 12/28/2015 09:21 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
b. It has support for bibliographic references, footnotes a a more
complete feature set.
I wonder how is it that despite being present for so long, it does miss
such features...
Well that's the cost of being part of a small communi
Saša
have a look at Pillar and you can add footnotes and we will review your
code and integrate it.
We are just really busy right now.
Stef
Hi,
On 28/12/15 10:43, Saša Janiška wrote:
On Pon, 2015-12-28 at 10:21 -0500, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
That's why I recommending you pandoc's markdown variant. It has
extensive support for footnotes, bibliographic references, tables,
latex, a lot of exporting formats and extensibil
On Pon, 2015-12-28 at 10:21 -0500, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
> That's why I recommending you pandoc's markdown variant. It has
> extensive support for footnotes, bibliographic references, tables,
> latex, a lot of exporting formats and extensibility via exporting and
> manipulating t
Hi,
On 28/12/15 06:16, Saša Janiška wrote:
On Ned, 2015-12-27 at 18:50 -0500, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
Hiya,
Seems that the reasons exposed in this tread are: It predated
markdown, so was already used inside the community, and gives us
finer control on the overall markup languag
On Ned, 2015-12-27 at 18:50 -0500, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
Hiya,
> Seems that the reasons exposed in this tread are: It predated
> markdown, so was already used inside the community, and gives us
> finer control on the overall markup language, including exporting
> formats.
Nothi
Hi Gour,
It seems that I have some similar quest to you, so I will try to answer
about my approximation to documentation in the Pharo worl, even with the
existance of Pillar (but being by no means any kind of expert on it, and
of course this is my own experience, your mileage may vary).
On 2
On Pet, 2015-12-25 at 15:59 -0500, Robert Withers wrote:
Hello Robert,
> Welcome to Pharo! I view use of Pharo (squeak) as a knowledge
> sacrifice eliminating bondage to Karma. This is not the mainstream and
> a good thing too.
Nice comparison...although, being at the beginning I still do not
u
Sorry, that was meant to be private.
---
robert
> On Dec 25, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Robert Withers
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 25, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Saša Janiška wrote:
>> --
>> As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna, so does the
>> fire of knowledge burn to ashes all reactions to mater
> On Dec 25, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Saša Janiška wrote:
> --
> As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna, so does the
> fire of knowledge burn to ashes all reactions to material activities.
---
The knowledge sacrifice is superior
To any material sacrifice, O Arjuna.
Because, all actions
On Pet, 2015-12-25 at 18:07 +0100, Damien Cassou wrote:
> We wanted to generate slides, Cyril changed Pillar to generate slides.
> We want to generate exercises and questions, we will change Pillar to
> generate questions in a dedicated format for a specific MOOC platform.
> Because Pillar is in P
On Pet, 2015-12-25 at 18:10 +0100, Damien Cassou wrote:
> I don't like footnotes so I never added them.
Heh, that's *you*, but I still wonder about all other Pillar users.
> If you like them,
Let me say that I *need* them - that's the nature of the content I
write...
> I guess it's less tha
On December 25, 2015 6:02:05 PM GMT+01:00, "Saša Janiška"
wrote:
>Can Pillar handle footnotes? (I can't see on the cheetsheet.)
I don't like footnotes so I never added them. If you like them, I guess it's
less than a hundred lines of code using annotations.
>Seeing that quotes are used for *
On December 25, 2015 5:02:13 PM GMT+01:00, "Saša Janiška"
wrote:
>Hiya,
>
>I see that Pharo project has embraced Pillar system for documentation
>purposes and my first question was "Why Pillar?" since, iirc,
>comparison
>was made with e.g Markdown which is, obviously, not sufficient for eg.
>auth
On Pet, 2015-12-25 at 17:36 +0100, stepharo wrote:
> Pillar exists before Markdown.
> We did pillar syntax back in 2002.
Heh, it's interesting that both rst & AsciiDoc are also, according to
Wikipedia from 2002. :-)
What about Pillar and Pharo? Any additional advantage to use it?
> We do that w
Le 25/12/15 17:02, Saša Janiška a écrit :
Hiya,
I see that Pharo project has embraced Pillar system for documentation
purposes and my first question was "Why Pillar?" since, iirc, comparison
was made with e.g Markdown which is, obviously, not sufficient for eg.
authoring books, but there are m
Hiya,
I see that Pharo project has embraced Pillar system for documentation
purposes and my first question was "Why Pillar?" since, iirc, comparison
was made with e.g Markdown which is, obviously, not sufficient for eg.
authoring books, but there are more capable markups with 'standard'
implementa
27 matches
Mail list logo
