Exactly
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Andrei Stebakov wrote:
>
> Thanks, Alexandre
> Looks like RTResizeableViewContextInteraction has no
Thanks, Alexandre
Looks like RTResizeableViewContextInteraction has no effect for the tree
that goes beyond the page.
On the other hand RTEmptyViewContextInteraction makes the tree that used to
be shrunk to fit in the page go beyond the page, as expected I guess.
So the RTResizeableViewContextInter
> I also stumbled upon RTHorizontalTreeLayout that works much better in terms
> of having more compact representation.
> What I found out though is that when I inspect the view sometimes it displays
> all the ellipses with their specified sizes and sometimes it shrinks the view
> to fit in the v
Hi Alexandre
Thank you for your suggestion!
I also stumbled upon RTHorizontalTreeLayout that works much better in terms
of having more compact representation.
What I found out though is that when I inspect the view sometimes it
displays all the ellipses with their specified sizes and sometimes it
> Alexandre, is there a way to display RTTreeLayout so that it would try to fit
> elements in a more vertical fashion.
> Let's say even if the parent node has 8 children it would try to arrange them
> not in one long horizontal line (which depending on the width of elements can
> be really wide)
Alexandre, is there a way to display RTTreeLayout so that it would try to
fit elements in a more vertical fashion.
Let's say even if the parent node has 8 children it would try to arrange
them not in one long horizontal line (which depending on the width of
elements can be really wide),
but spread
> Thanks, Alexandre, it works!
> Also since I use RTView and RTEdgeBuilder I can use
> view @ RTDraggableView to achieve the “draggability"
Yes! Glad to hear the problem is solved!
Alexandre
>
> On Mar 22, 2018 14:01, "Alexandre Bergel" wrote:
> I see.
> Do you know you can drag and drop the
Thanks, Alexandre, it works!
Also since I use RTView and RTEdgeBuilder I can use
view @ RTDraggableView to achieve the "draggability"
On Mar 22, 2018 14:01, "Alexandre Bergel" wrote:
> I see.
> Do you know you can drag and drop the background to scroll?
>
> You can also make the view zoomable, u
Forgot to mention that you need to update Roassal
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On Mar 22, 2018, at 3:00 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
> I see.
> Do you know you can d
I see.
Do you know you can drag and drop the background to scroll?
You can also make the view zoomable, using the mouse wheel.
Try this:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
b := RTMondrian new.
b nodes: (RTObject withAllSubclasses).
b edges connectFrom: #superclass.
b layout radial.
b build.
b view @ RTZoomable
Hi Alexandre
I don't see how I can do without the scroll bars in HTML since the node
tree that I tender using RTTreeLayout has a big width and only 1/4 of it
fits in one page view.
Since I am building a web service I rely on rendering and serving the view
in HTML and without the scroll bars there
Hi!
Scroll bar are not exportable to HTML, as benefits in doing so are not really
apparent.
What would be the ideal behavior? Will removing scrollbars when exporting to
HTML sufficient for your need?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel htt
When I do
v @ RTDoubleScrollBar.
and then export to HTML
the bars are rendered in the middle of HTML page and they don't actually
scroll.
I checked in in Chrome and IE on windows. Could you guys take a look?
13 matches
Mail list logo
