Exactly Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Andrei Stebakov <lisper...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks, Alexandre > Looks like RTResizeableViewContextInteraction has no effect for the tree that > goes beyond the page. > On the other hand RTEmptyViewContextInteraction makes the tree that used to > be shrunk to fit in the page go beyond the page, as expected I guess. > So the RTResizeableViewContextInteraction doesn't work as expected (since the > expectation is to fit in the page as I understand) > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 13:56 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com > <mailto:alexandre.ber...@me.com>> wrote: >> I also stumbled upon RTHorizontalTreeLayout that works much better in terms >> of having more compact representation. >> What I found out though is that when I inspect the view sometimes it >> displays all the ellipses with their specified sizes and sometimes it >> shrinks the view to fit in the viewable area. Can't put my finger on what >> triggers the view be rendered with normal sized (doesn't fit the page) vs >> zoomed out (fits the page) > > Yes, you can have a look at Roassal2GT-Glamour-Roassal-Interaction > > Here are some examples. The default behavior is obtained by: > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > b := RTMondrian new. > b nodes: (1 to: 100). > b layout grid. > b view @ RTResizeableViewContextInteraction. > b > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > If you wish to not have any resize, then you can do: > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > b := RTMondrian new. > b nodes: (1 to: 100). > b layout grid. > b view @ RTEmptyViewContextInteraction. > b > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > The code is not clean at all. This is due to the limitation of GTInspector. > Help is welcome on that front! > > Alexandre > >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 23:21 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com >> <mailto:alexandre.ber...@me.com>> wrote: >>> Alexandre, is there a way to display RTTreeLayout so that it would try to >>> fit elements in a more vertical fashion. >>> Let's say even if the parent node has 8 children it would try to arrange >>> them not in one long horizontal line (which depending on the width of >>> elements can be really wide), >>> but spread them more vertically, so they would be viewable on one page. >>> Or maybe I need to try another layout to reach that goal? >> >> There is the horizontal tree layout that you may want to try. >> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >> b := RTMondrian new. >> b shape circle. >> b nodes: Collection withAllSubclasses. >> b edges connectFrom: #superclass. >> b normalizer normalizeSize: #numberOfMethods; normalizeColor: >> #numberOfLinesOfCode. >> b layout horizontalTree. >> b >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >> >> >> >> Does it help? >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com >>> <mailto:alexandre.ber...@me.com>> wrote: >>> > Thanks, Alexandre, it works! >>> > Also since I use RTView and RTEdgeBuilder I can use >>> > view @ RTDraggableView to achieve the “draggability" >>> >>> Yes! Glad to hear the problem is solved! >>> >>> Alexandre >>> >>> > >>> > On Mar 22, 2018 14:01, "Alexandre Bergel" <alexandre.ber...@me.com >>> > <mailto:alexandre.ber...@me.com>> wrote: >>> > I see. >>> > Do you know you can drag and drop the background to scroll? >>> > >>> > You can also make the view zoomable, using the mouse wheel. >>> > >>> > Try this: >>> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>> > b := RTMondrian new. >>> > b nodes: (RTObject withAllSubclasses). >>> > b edges connectFrom: #superclass. >>> > b layout radial. >>> > b build. >>> > >>> > b view @ RTZoomableView. >>> > RTHTML5Exporter new >>> > directoryPathname: '/tmp'; >>> > export: b view. >>> > >>> > b view >>> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>> > >>> > Alexandre >>> > -- >>> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu <http://www.bergel.eu/> >>> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Andrei Stebakov <lisper...@gmail.com >>> >> <mailto:lisper...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Alexandre >>> >> >>> >> I don't see how I can do without the scroll bars in HTML since the node >>> >> tree that I tender using RTTreeLayout has a big width and only 1/4 of it >>> >> fits in one page view. >>> >> Since I am building a web service I rely on rendering and serving the >>> >> view in HTML and without the scroll bars there is no way for me to view >>> >> all elements of the model in Chrome. >>> >> >>> >> On Mar 22, 2018 11:50, "Alexandre Bergel" <alexandre.ber...@me.com >>> >> <mailto:alexandre.ber...@me.com>> wrote: >>> >> Hi! >>> >> >>> >> Scroll bar are not exportable to HTML, as benefits in doing so are not >>> >> really apparent. >>> >> What would be the ideal behavior? Will removing scrollbars when >>> >> exporting to HTML sufficient for your need? >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> Alexandre >>> >> -- >>> >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu <http://www.bergel.eu/> >>> >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> On Mar 22, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Andrei Stebakov <lisper...@gmail.com >>> >>> <mailto:lisper...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> When I do >>> >>> v @ RTDoubleScrollBar. >>> >>> and then export to HTML >>> >>> the bars are rendered in the middle of HTML page and they don't >>> >>> actually scroll. >>> >>> I checked in in Chrome and IE on windows. Could you guys take a look? >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> <Screenshot 2018-03-28 00.19.54.png> >
