> Alexandre, is there a way to display RTTreeLayout so that it would try to fit > elements in a more vertical fashion. > Let's say even if the parent node has 8 children it would try to arrange them > not in one long horizontal line (which depending on the width of elements can > be really wide), > but spread them more vertically, so they would be viewable on one page. > Or maybe I need to try another layout to reach that goal?
There is the horizontal tree layout that you may want to try. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= b := RTMondrian new. b shape circle. b nodes: Collection withAllSubclasses. b edges connectFrom: #superclass. b normalizer normalizeSize: #numberOfMethods; normalizeColor: #numberOfLinesOfCode. b layout horizontalTree. b -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Does it help? Cheers, Alexandre > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com> > wrote: > > Thanks, Alexandre, it works! > > Also since I use RTView and RTEdgeBuilder I can use > > view @ RTDraggableView to achieve the “draggability" > > Yes! Glad to hear the problem is solved! > > Alexandre > > > > > On Mar 22, 2018 14:01, "Alexandre Bergel" <alexandre.ber...@me.com> wrote: > > I see. > > Do you know you can drag and drop the background to scroll? > > > > You can also make the view zoomable, using the mouse wheel. > > > > Try this: > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > b := RTMondrian new. > > b nodes: (RTObject withAllSubclasses). > > b edges connectFrom: #superclass. > > b layout radial. > > b build. > > > > b view @ RTZoomableView. > > RTHTML5Exporter new > > directoryPathname: '/tmp'; > > export: b view. > > > > b view > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > > > Alexandre > > -- > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > >> On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Andrei Stebakov <lisper...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Alexandre > >> > >> I don't see how I can do without the scroll bars in HTML since the node > >> tree that I tender using RTTreeLayout has a big width and only 1/4 of it > >> fits in one page view. > >> Since I am building a web service I rely on rendering and serving the view > >> in HTML and without the scroll bars there is no way for me to view all > >> elements of the model in Chrome. > >> > >> On Mar 22, 2018 11:50, "Alexandre Bergel" <alexandre.ber...@me.com> wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> Scroll bar are not exportable to HTML, as benefits in doing so are not > >> really apparent. > >> What would be the ideal behavior? Will removing scrollbars when exporting > >> to HTML sufficient for your need? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Alexandre > >> -- > >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Mar 22, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Andrei Stebakov <lisper...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> When I do > >>> v @ RTDoubleScrollBar. > >>> and then export to HTML > >>> the bars are rendered in the middle of HTML page and they don't actually > >>> scroll. > >>> I checked in in Chrome and IE on windows. Could you guys take a look? > >> > > > > >
