In a computing monoculture of overcomplex ways of doing programming
and DVCS is refreshing to find a community where alternative ideas
like Pharo and fossil and listened and used.
Indeed...now I'm into learning Pharo trying to adjust to some
alternatives, but those will require to ask some addi
Le 23/12/15 14:23, Saša Janiška a écrit :
On Sri, 2015-12-23 at 20:01 +0800, Pierce Ng wrote:
For now I'm not bothered about integrating Fossil as a Pharo VCS
though. I just use Monticello.
Is Monticello good-enough for collaboration with smaller team of devs?
of course.
Pharo itself is de
On Sri, 2015-12-23 at 09:20 -0500, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
> In a computing monoculture of overcomplex ways of doing programming
> and DVCS is refreshing to find a community where alternative ideas
> like Pharo and fossil and listened and used.
Indeed...now I'm into learning Pharo t
Hi,
On 23/12/15 08:23, Saša Janiška wrote:
On Sri, 2015-12-23 at 20:01 +0800, Pierce Ng wrote:
For now I'm not bothered about integrating Fossil as a Pharo VCS
though. I just use Monticello.
Is Monticello good-enough for collaboration with smaller team of devs?
Yes, if you work only with S
On Sri, 2015-12-23 at 20:01 +0800, Pierce Ng wrote:
> For now I'm not bothered about integrating Fossil as a Pharo VCS
> though. I just use Monticello.
Is Monticello good-enough for collaboration with smaller team of devs?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Saša Janiška wrote:
> Sure, I'm really excited about it and exploring further. However, it's
> nice to find users within Pharo community who can see the merits of
> Fossil DVCS.
I use Fossil as personal wiki, VCS for config files, and ticketing system. I
l
On Uto, 2015-12-22 at 15:23 +0100, Hilaire wrote:
> As for now, you have to use filetree, over fossil repo, but from Pharo
> you can only save to the repo, no way to fetch back I think.
OK.
> But if you are potential Pharo users, you should not waste your time
> on the CVS question but discover
Le 22/12/15 11:39, Saša Janiška a écrit :
On Uto, 2015-10-20 at 11:09 +0200, Hilaire wrote:
Hello,
potential Pharo user here who just installed 5.0 image on his Debian Sid
and researching whether Smalltalk (Pharo) can be used as language for
writing some multi-platform opens-source apps...
Hello,
As for now, you have to use filetree, over fossil repo, but from Pharo
you can only save to the repo, no way to fetch back I think.
The GIT integration is more advanced with dedicated GIT package for Pharo.
As a first iteration, I did some code modifications -- blindly I have to
admit -- o
On Uto, 2015-10-20 at 11:09 +0200, Hilaire wrote:
Hello,
potential Pharo user here who just installed 5.0 image on his Debian Sid
and researching whether Smalltalk (Pharo) can be used as language for
writing some multi-platform opens-source apps...tried/evaluated several
languages, but, consideri
Stef,
There is no problem.
I just *lack time* to keep moving on DrGeo features and migrate to
Pharo4.0 at the same time.
I quickly try Dr. Geo code on Pharo4 and realize it will need some work
and lot of user testing to get DrGeo as robust as it is now. We will
conduct end user experiment in p
2015-10-29 10:26 GMT+01:00 Hilaire :
> Le 24/10/2015 18:44, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> > Hilaire, if you prefer a Smalltalkhub project, just do so and I'll
> > make regular merges back into filetree.
>
> I commited to SqueakSource a few abstractions WIP
> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/istoa/
> I mor
Le 24/10/2015 18:44, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> Hilaire, if you prefer a Smalltalkhub project, just do so and I'll
> make regular merges back into filetree.
I commited to SqueakSource a few abstractions WIP
http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/istoa/
I more or less randomly abstracted the classes but can't
At the end of the day, I would assume that it would be possible to run
travis-ci tests against a fossil repository which would be very useful
to have ... but like I said, I'm fine with whatever you guys decide...
Dale
On 10/24/15 10:12 AM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Le 24/10/2015 18:56, Hilaire a
Le 24/10/2015 18:56, Hilaire a écrit :
I was not aware filetree need to be modified as well? But wait, I can
use it right now with Fossil, so I am bit lost.
No, no. This is just the development of GitFileTree is integrated inside
the main FileTree repository.
If you look at
https://github.c
I was not aware filetree need to be modified as well? But wait, I can
use it right now with Fossil, so I am bit lost.
Hilaire
Le 24/10/2015 18:44, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> Hilaire, Dale,
>
> the easiest would be to make a fork of filetree on github, and try
> from there. But a branch in the ma
Hilaire, Dale,
the easiest would be to make a fork of filetree on github, and try from
there. But a branch in the main filetree would work just as well, with
the added benefit of the travis CI integration (and gitfiletree has
tests in there). Running tests locally is often necessary, but setti
Thierry and Hilaire,
If you want to work together up on the github repo, that's up to you and
Hilaire, if you have a github id, let me know and I will add you as a
contributor on the project so that you two can work together ...
Dale
On 10/24/15 6:55 AM, Hilaire wrote:
Le 22/10/2015 10:47,
Le 22/10/2015 10:47, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> Yes, I guess so.
>
> Still, with all the people interested by Fossil, I think the
> motivation is there. And it would be nice to see a bit of refactoring
> to decouple the format from the specific commands used for the
> specific VCS.
>
> Thierry
I
I will write you if needed, I am not there yet.
Hilaire
Le 22/10/2015 22:51, Dale Henrichs a écrit :
> Hilaire, if you are interested in contributing, I would be willing to
> add you to the FileTree project up on GitHub ... Oops, unless you
> don't want to be:)
>
> Dale
>
> On 10/22/2015 01:40 AM
Hilaire, if you are interested in contributing, I would be willing to
add you to the FileTree project up on GitHub ... Oops, unless you don't
want to be:)
Dale
On 10/22/2015 01:40 AM, Hilaire wrote:
Le 21/10/2015 22:03, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
Just use the ConfigurationOfGitFileTree availa
2015-10-22 11:16 GMT+02:00 Hilaire :
> Le 22/10/2015 10:47, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> > Still, with all the people interested by Fossil, I think the
> > motivation is there. And it would be nice to see a bit of refactoring
> > to decouple the format from the specific commands used for the
> > sp
Le 22/10/2015 10:47, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> Still, with all the people interested by Fossil, I think the
> motivation is there. And it would be nice to see a bit of refactoring
> to decouple the format from the specific commands used for the
> specific VCS.
>
Decoupling was my first though loo
2015-10-22 10:40 GMT+02:00 Hilaire :
> Le 21/10/2015 22:03, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> >
> > Just use the ConfigurationOfGitFileTree available in your
> > Configuration browser in the image ;)
> >
> > Or
> >
> > Metacello new
> > configuration: 'GitFileTree';
> > repository:
> > 'http://s
Le 21/10/2015 22:03, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
>
> Just use the ConfigurationOfGitFileTree available in your
> Configuration browser in the image ;)
>
> Or
>
> Metacello new
> configuration: 'GitFileTree';
> repository:
> 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/MetaRepoForPharo30/main';
> loa
Bernardo,
I host my own repos. Is really easy[1]. In my case was just a matter of
enabling cgi on lighttpd[2] and adding the lines at [3] to the
lighttpd.conf file. There is a place that offers fossil hosting as a
service[4] and at some time I tried to make my own in web2py (but code
is not m
Hi Offray
What fossil hosting service do you recommend ?
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <
off...@riseup.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/10/15 13:34, Dale Henrichs wrote:
>
>> This is good to hear
>>
>> I am pro-git, because well you have to pick an
Hi,
On 20/10/15 13:34, Dale Henrichs wrote:
This is good to hear
I am pro-git, because well you have to pick an SCM to talk about and I
do think that the collaboration tools for open source projects on
github are superior to anything else...
My friends think the same, but usually the
Hi Stef,
Thanks for this review. Because of its portability and simplicity I use
it for every project I have. Since 2011 I'm writing my thesis as a solo
"open research" exercise (before it get fashioned ;-) time line at [1]).
Now I used in conjunction with STON to write all the thesis inside
Le 21/10/2015 21:58, Hilaire a écrit :
Thanks for the details it will be helpful, but I wanted to know where is
the .mcz package?
Just use the ConfigurationOfGitFileTree available in your Configuration
browser in the image ;)
Or
Metacello new
configuration: 'GitFileTree';
re
Thanks for the details it will be helpful, but I wanted to know where is
the .mcz package?
Hilaire
Le 21/10/2015 21:29, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> Le 21/10/2015 21:09, Hilaire a écrit :
>> Le 20/10/2015 16:32, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
>>> Done. The configuration has been updated for Pharo3.
>>
Le 21/10/2015 21:09, Hilaire a écrit :
Le 20/10/2015 16:32, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
Done. The configuration has been updated for Pharo3.
Où dois-je regarder ?
Look the following methods in MCFileTreeGitRepository,
protocole git querying:
gitBranchs
gitCloneRepositoryAndCheckoutIn:
gitNe
Le 20/10/2015 16:32, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> Done. The configuration has been updated for Pharo3.
>
Où dois-je regarder ?
--
Dr. Geo
http://drgeo.eu
http://google.com/+DrgeoEu
Stef,
There is no problem.
I just *lack time* to keep moving on DrGeo features and migrate to
Pharo4.0 at the same time.
I quickly try Dr. Geo code on Pharo4 and realize it will need some work
and lot of user testing to get DrGeo as robust as it is now. We will
conduct end user experiment in prim
This is good to hear
I am pro-git, because well you have to pick an SCM to talk about and I
do think that the collaboration tools for open source projects on github
are superior to anything else...
Git other than that I am glad that folks are finding that FileTree is
working for other d
6.0 Review Of Key Concepts
The fossil program is a self-contained stand-alone executable. Just put
it somewhere on your PATH to install it.
Use the clone or new commands to create a new repository.
Use the open command to create a new source tree.
Use the add and rm or delete commands to add an
2015-10-20 16:07 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier :
>
>
> 2015-10-20 12:21 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier :
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-10-20 12:17 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-10-20 12:13 GMT+02:00 Hilaire :
>>>
Le 20/10/2015 11:20, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> So it looks very similar to a f
2015-10-20 12:21 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier :
>
>
> 2015-10-20 12:17 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier :
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-10-20 12:13 GMT+02:00 Hilaire :
>>
>>> Le 20/10/2015 11:20, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
>>> > So it looks very similar to a filetree + git workflow ?
>>> >
>>> > Any taker on adding a foss
Hilaire
what is the problem that you encounter to still be in Pharo3.0?
Stef
Le 20/10/15 12:13, Hilaire a écrit :
Le 20/10/2015 11:20, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
So it looks very similar to a filetree + git workflow ?
Any taker on adding a fossil interface to filetree with the same
approach
2015-10-20 12:17 GMT+02:00 Thierry Goubier :
>
>
> 2015-10-20 12:13 GMT+02:00 Hilaire :
>
>> Le 20/10/2015 11:20, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
>> > So it looks very similar to a filetree + git workflow ?
>> >
>> > Any taker on adding a fossil interface to filetree with the same
>> > approach as GitFi
2015-10-20 12:13 GMT+02:00 Hilaire :
> Le 20/10/2015 11:20, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> > So it looks very similar to a filetree + git workflow ?
> >
> > Any taker on adding a fossil interface to filetree with the same
> > approach as GitFileTree ?
> >
> > Thierry
>
> Which version of GitFileTree
Le 20/10/2015 11:20, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> So it looks very similar to a filetree + git workflow ?
>
> Any taker on adding a fossil interface to filetree with the same
> approach as GitFileTree ?
>
> Thierry
Which version of GitFileTree should I take for Pharo3?
Hilaire
--
Dr. Geo
http://
Le 20/10/2015 11:20, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
> So it looks very similar to a filetree + git workflow ?
I don't know much git, but I guess it will the same
>
> Any taker on adding a fossil interface to filetree with the same
> approach as GitFileTree ?
I will take a look, adapting should be qui
2015-10-20 11:09 GMT+02:00 Hilaire :
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying Fossil with Filetree, and I was rather please by the
> mutuals use of these tools. So I may share a few feedbacks.
> Fossil[1] itself is a software to manage source code development. It is
> very simple to install and data is saved
Hi,
I have been trying Fossil with Filetree, and I was rather please by the
mutuals use of these tools. So I may share a few feedbacks.
Fossil[1] itself is a software to manage source code development. It is
very simple to install and data is saved in a single sqlite database. It
comes with source
45 matches
Mail list logo
