The .sources file has been optional for as long as I can remember.
Is it OK for list that somebody breaks this tradition?
Trygve
On 2020-08-29 04:49, Esteban Maringolo wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to get rid the .sources file in a deployment scenario?
I followed this guide [1], but I cannot get
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
--
/The essence of object orientation is that objects collaborateto achieve
a goal. /
Trygve Reenskaug mailto: tryg...@ifi.uio.no <mailto:%20tryg...@ifi.uio.no>
Morgedalsvn. 5A http://folk.uio.no/trygver/
N-0378 Oslo
a new edition of Windows. I'm hoping
the creator of the program will fix the problem. In the mean time, I
have to remember to start the program manually every morning. This
applies to Win7 and Win 10.
Hope this helps even if it doesn't solve the problem.
--Trygve
On 12.05.2020 21
* A coding experiment.*
Consider a Scrum development environment. Every programming team has an
end user as a member.
The team's task is to code a credit card validity check.
A first goal is that the user representative shall read the code and
agree that it is a correct rendering of their code
Could the class documentation you are looking for be generated
automagically from the class comments? The first para could be a blurb
describing the purpose of the class. The resulting document could be
searchable.
--Trygve
On 26.03.2020 14:43, horrido wrote:
I didn't ask them that,
outdated
and useless by the time it's finished. I'm 90, so the temptation is
resisted and story ends here.
Best
--Trygve
On 08.02.2020 18:02, TedVanGaalen wrote:
Hi Ben
Maybe you misunderstood what I meant.
I was thinking of Pharo-backward-compatibility.
not Smalltalk-backward-compatibi
Here's a video that demonstrates something that has been done with Squeak:
http://folk.uio.no/trygver/2017/Ellen-video-2.6(copy22)-%20AVCHD.H264.1440x1080p24.mp4
--Trygve
On 28.10.2019 21:32, Richard Kenneth Eng wrote:
https://youtu.be/pB0iI6ksW30
--
/The essence of object orientati
I dream of a future with the release of a Loke 1.0 that is firmly
embedded in Pharo. A Loke that is quickly becoming the computing
environment of choice for millions of homeowners and schoolchildren.
Trygve
On 25.07.2019 18:34, Cédrick Béler wrote:
Me too !
And on the huge esug discussion
s
controversial and should probably delete some or all of it to avoid
angry answers. Another reason why I probably shouldn't send it is that I
do not have time to engage in a discussion. I /must /give priority to
finishing my article on DCI and PP. (A ~50 page draft is on my home
page; it will
n7-VM.
I'll update the ZIP if anybody is interested in
actually running BabyIDE
--Trygve
On 08.05.2018 20:06, H. Hirzel wrote:
On 5/6/18, Trygve Reenskaug wrote:
I'm working on a programing paradigm and IDE for the personal programmer
who wants to control his or her IoT.
Of course not. But one of my goals is that future dynabooks will be
backwards compatible. Recent discussions have shown me that this goal is
a research project.
--Trygve
On 09.05.2018 12:19, Marcus Denker wrote:
I go back to Alan Kay's vision of a Dynabook: A/personal/computer
for chi
is a new
research project that I look forward to digging into as soon as time
permits.
Thanks
-Trygve
On 08.05.2018 09:57, Norbert Hartl wrote:
Am 08.05.2018 um 08:30 schrieb Trygve Reenskaug <mailto:tryg...@ifi.uio.no>>:
Norbert,
I stand corrected because I have not followed
tributions to my thinking.
--Trygve.
On 07.05.2018 14:14, Norbert Hartl wrote:
Am 07.05.2018 um 12:42 schrieb Trygve Reenskaug <mailto:tryg...@ifi.uio.no>>:
Please tell me when Java, C, C++, etc programs stopped working
because their runtime systems had changed.
Please tell me whe
pharo version 4. And then for version 5, version 6,….
Sounds like a dream…but hey…it is indeed realistic. It just depends on
how the people approach it
How does this sound?
Norbert
Am 07.05.2018 um 11:31 schrieb Trygve Reenskaug <mailto:tryg...@ifi.uio.no>>:
Thanks for your quick a
er they are doing in
order to adapt their applications to the new Pharo so that you can start
serving your customers again.
Cheers
--Trygve
On 06.05.2018 13:00, Norbert Hartl wrote:
Can you elaborate on what you consider as a kernel? There are always
things moving in the pharo world. The la
alue for millions of non-expert users?
--Thanks, Trygve
On 05.05.2018 13:53, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
I’ve taken a look at what would be needed to
support magma on pharo a few years ago. Chris always told us he uses it
professionally on squeak and/*has not enough capacity to keep up with changes
I rest my case.
--Trygve
On 10.06.2015 20:57, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
If I remember correctly, it was easy to port Moose from VW to Pharo,
because there was a lot of tests.
I'm currently working on porting another software from VW to Pharo
without any tests and I'm suffering;-)
was partly because I believe you
underestimate the work needed to port BabyIDE to Pharo and partly
because you do not appear to appreciate the need that programmers (your
customers) have for a stable programming language.
Trygve
On 09.06.2015 19:59, stepharo wrote:
I'm sorry to say that Pharo
later.
Cheers
--Trygve
On 11.02.2015 18:36, kilon alios wrote:
Well I tried in the past to use openqwaq , but what I learned from the
experience is that sometimes understanding others code can be even
more time consuming than remaking it yourself. I spent like an
afternoon trying to understand
[ :aClass |
aClass -> aClass allInstances size])
sort: [ :a :b | a value > b value ]
It takes some time to run, especially in a larger image.
Stephan
--
/The essence of object orientation is that objects collaborateto achieve
a goal. /
Trygve Reenska
, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Trygve Reenskaug [via Smalltalk]
<[hidden email] > wrote:
Because your drawOn: method doesn't draw anything and needs help
from super.
It seems to me that you need to read more documentation :-)
On 05.02.2015 15:53, nacho wrote:
That work perfec
Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Trygve Reenskaug [via Smalltalk]
<[hidden email] > wrote:
I've tested your code in Squeak and found another bug (I should
have been more careful when I read your code. Shame on me.)
In class Ball you have the methods
position: aPoint
pseMorph handles its position and bounds . This
will not be trivial. Much easier to invent a new instance variable and
use it in the drawOn: method.
Good luck with your apprenticeship
On 05.02.2015 11:56, nacho wrote:
@Trygve
I've checked and it doesn't work. I can't even
hat I can test it)
--Trygve
On 04.02.2015 19:00, nacho wrote:
Hi,
I have the following question:
I want to draw a bouncing ball.
First thing I do is create a class:
EllipseMorph subclass: #Ball
instanceVariableNames: 'position'
classVariableNames: ''
ca
Excellent talk. I was particularly happy with the hammer illustration on
slide 8.
--Trygve
On 04.02.2015 10:43, stepharo wrote:
Better on this list.
Message transféré
Sujet : [Pharo-dev] why smalltalk is the best system to support
object-oriented thinking :)
Date : Tue
It's a fact of life that leverage implies rigidity. A rubber crowbar is
flexible, but useless.
Our challenge is, as I see it, to determine the minimum we need to keep
rigid in order to get maximum leverage for doing the rest.
--Trygve
On 03.02.2015 14:34, Marcus Denker wrote:
On 03 Feb
fterwards, I could read the generated Morphic code and say: Aha! So
that's how I should have done it.
Just a dream.
--Trygve
On 20.12.2014 14:08, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
On 20 Dec 2014, at 13:44, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
kilon.alios wrote
even if continue to use Spec I will stiil h
On 27.09.2014 09:26, Marcus Denker wrote:
On 27 Sep 2014, at 07:17, stepharo <mailto:steph...@free.fr>> wrote:
Trygve
We took exactly the same license process and text than squeak. This
way people cannot argue that this is different
because pharo is based on Squeak. It took squea
RE."
I have no problem with signing this, but I have a problem with signing a
carte blanche.
--Trygve
On 26.09.2014 07:25, stepharo wrote:
Hi guys
do not forget to sign the license agreement
http://files.pharo.org/media/PharoSoftwareDistributionAgreement.pdf
and send us your picture to be
Thanks. Looks like a powerful improvement. --Trygve
On 21.09.2014 19:34, Tudor Girba wrote:
Class categories are system categories :).
Since Pharo 3.0, they are replaced with RPackage. They are still
around at the moment as a backup system, but almost everything in the
image should now
Doru,
"/Now pay attention class categories will not exist in the future./"
I already know about system categories (categories of classes) and
method categories within a class.
I understood you to mean system categories.
What are class categories and why will they be removed?
--T
On 20.09.2014 14:51, stepharo wrote:
This is cool I blog about it.
Now pay attention class categories will not exist in the future.
Stef
Any ref to this development?
aro evolves not to another programming language but rather to a
human language and a human environment liberating the user from the
technicalities of the system. Pharo is small but is going to a very
promising direction.
All hail Pharo :)
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Trygve Reenskaug <m
has lost backward compatibility).
--Trygve
On 11.09.2014 18:10, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
"Smalltalk is not a language, it is an object computer"
Wow, that nails it quite nicely.
And it feels a lot like that, especially with tools like GT-Playground.
Now, the most complicated bit i
On 07.09.2014 12:29, kilon alios wrote:
...
Referring to the rest of your post I dont agree that we need to separate Data
from Code,
I don't know of anybody who wants to separate data and code. May be you
are thinking about DCI without having grokked it.
Smalltalk sees an object as an enti
its not even
environments but tools that are produced in these environments that can vastly
automate coding and hide the increasing complexity of coding solutions. Maybe
one day a child will be able to describe to a computer what kind of software he
or she needs and the computer autom
t;>BabyIDE1>>BB5Bank opens a DCI browser on the same
example.
(Recommended as a first
study.)
enjoy
--Trygve
On 29.08.2014 06:32, H. Hirzel wrote:
Thank you Trygve!
Where will the Powerpoint slides / report be posted?
--Hannes
On 8/18/14, G
ntial reference
--Trygve
On 26.08.2014 03:08, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
Hi Wilfred and welcome,
I have been lurking at the Smalltalk/Squeak community like from ten
years when I used Etoys, Bots Inc and Scratch to teach newbies an
introductory course on "informatics" (whic
m DCI role methods.
--Trygve
On 26.08.2014 01:33, Wilfred Hughes wrote:
Sounds like the Dynabook goal rather overlaps with that of Lisp
Machines. The idea of a single system that allows you to modify any
part at runtime, inspect any part, or drop into a debugger anywhere is
extremely powerful and wo
lications" in which it is commonplace
for users to dig down and modify any level.
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Can-Pharo-meet-all-your-computing-needs-tp4774250p4774868.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.
similar. More
like iOS than an app.
This is fun
--Trygve
---
/I am using the term BOOK rather than Dynabook because Alan Kay has the
moral copyright to the latter and he may not agree with what we are doing./
On 25.08.2014 16:15, S Krish wrote:
" The Dynabook SW architectur
.zip
It would be great if we could do serious work on a realization of the
Dynabook dream together. Pharo may be a good starting point because its
community seems very open to new ideas.
Cheers
--Trygve
PS.
The BabyIDE is an application browser rather than a class browser. There
is a kind of
(I suppose
this is an ST based OS?)
Any takers?
--Trygve
On 23.08.2014 17:04, Wilfred Hughes wrote:
Hi folks
I've been playing with Pharo recently, and really enjoying writing
some programs in the Pharo environment.
As a result, I've been wondering if I can use Pharo the
runtime!/
--Trygve
--
Trygve Reenskaug mailto: tryg...@ifi.uio.no
Morgedalsvn. 5A http://folk.uio.no/trygver/
http://fulloo.info/
N-0378 Oslo http://fullOO.info
Norway Mobile: (+47) 468 58 625
44 matches
Mail list logo
