On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 10:37 PM, volkert
wrote:
> Is this change resonable. I have no idea, what the Design-Idea behind the
> UIManager what services is should provide.
Sorry I can't comment. I'm not familiar with the design intent.
cheers -ben
> May be it make sense to have the
> extra service
Le 06/06/2015 14:57, Sergio Fedi a écrit :
> So getting back to Pharo's tags, I like the fact that there are some
common namings, such as many packages will have tags like "Examples", or
"Tests", however I still fail to see why would you want to put one class
into multiple tags and what the bene
+1 to subpackages as denomination for tags if they're going to be used
only to organize things hierarchically inside a package instead of used
across packages.
Cheers,
Offray
On 03/06/15 13:42, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Sergio Fedi wrote
If something is a tag, then you should be able to apply
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Francisco Garau
wrote:
>>
>> I am playing with the Coral image downloaded from the CI site.
>>
>>
>> ok now again pay attention. The syntax is not important and stable.
>> What is more important is
>
>
> I understand what you are saying and it's not my intention to
I have opened a new case: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15711/
Am 06.06.2015 um 16:37 schrieb volkert:
Is this change resonable. I have no idea, what the Design-Idea behind
the UIManager what services is should provide. May be it make sense to
have the extra services on UIManager, but think
Is this change resonable. I have no idea, what the Design-Idea behind
the UIManager what services is should provide. May be it make sense to
have the extra services on UIManager, but think the bug is in
FileList>>viewContentsInWorkspace and not in UIManager.
I propose for Workspace to cha
Hi abdelghani
Welcome to this list :)
Hi Guys,
I believe the Ring metamodel has been proposed 4 or 5 years earlier.
Is it acctually in use in the current pharo tools? which ones?
Ring should be improved (probably with stubs) to support that we can
create a method and that it does not create
> So getting back to Pharo's tags, I like the fact that there are some
common namings, such as many packages will have tags like "Examples", or
"Tests", however I still fail to see why would you want to put one class
into multiple tags and what the benefit would be.
In my case I have a hard time d
> There is a little utils in nautilus that propose "good protocol" and we
should brigde the widget to us it.
Is there a Case for this?
Hi Stef,
On 6 June 2015 at 06:55, stepharo wrote:
>
>
> Le 5/6/15 21:37, Francisco Garau a écrit :
>
> Thanks Stefan.
>
> I am playing with the Coral image downloaded from the CI site.
>
>
> ok now again pay attention. The syntax is not important and stable.
> What is more important is
>
I und
>
> I am not clear on the internals dealing with "tag" , but in your
> example I guess the tags needs to be associated with classes, but our
> current "tag"s are associated with a packages?
Yeah at least to me it feels that it is associated more with packages.
GT-Tests-Spotter makes a good examp
As far as I remember Ficus relies on Ring and is a model for handling history.
It’s used by Epicea which is a new changes framework…
Uko
> On 06 Jun 2015, at 09:26, abdelghani ALIDRA wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I believe the Ring metamodel has been proposed 4 or 5 years earlier.
> Is it acctual
Hi Guys,
I believe the Ring metamodel has been proposed 4 or 5 years earlier.
Is it acctually in use in the current pharo tools? which ones?
I have been told that Martin has develloped a different model : Ficus
What are the limitations that Martin tried to fixed?What can be further
unhanced?
Than
13 matches
Mail list logo
