Re: [Pharo-users] Is there any fundamental technical barrier to compiling to JVM byte codes?

2013-12-24 Thread kilon alios
nothing is impossible if you give it either infinite amount of resources or infinite time. I think it would be a great idea, most likely doable with a good team . That would mean probably the redesign of all FFIs but it would gives us the ability to run tons of java libraries out of the box. Would

Re: [Pharo-users] WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0

2013-12-24 Thread vmusulainen
Stéphane Ducasse wrote > why do you want to use WebClient? Is there something that Zinc does not > provide? > Zinc is fully maintained by Sven and is better code. Yes, you are right - better use Zinc. I didn't found it early. Google search by "pharo http client" returned first link to WebCLient.

Re: [Pharo-users] WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0

2013-12-24 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi why do you want to use WebClient? Is there something that Zinc does not provide? Zinc is fully maintained by Sven and is better code. > Hi, > > I have loaded WebClient from ConfigurationTool on Pharo 2.0. > It seems something changed at system so I had some issues while loading the > packag

Re: [Pharo-users] Fwd: NativeBoost and standard out

2013-12-24 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Hernán Morales Durand wrote > Maybe does this help > ProcessWrapper new >useStdout; >startWithShellCommand: 'dir | sort'; >upToEnd Intriguing! I'll try it when I get access to a Windows machine... Thanks :) - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context:

Re: [Pharo-users] How to contribute [WAS: Re: WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0]

2013-12-24 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
Ok, let's continue in the other thread to avoid (more :) confusion. Hernán 2013/12/24 Esteban Lorenzano > > On 24 Dec 2013, at 14:54, Hernán Morales Durand > wrote: > > Then you better read how populations or languages become extinct. > > > if you can be less generic and more specific, please

Re: [Pharo-users] How to contribute [WAS: Re: WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0]

2013-12-24 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On 24 Dec 2013, at 14:54, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: > Then you better read how populations or languages become extinct. if you can be less generic and more specific, please. I’m trying to understand, not to make any points. Esteban > > Hernán > > > 2013/12/24 Esteban Lorenzano > btw

Re: [Pharo-users] How to contribute [WAS: Re: WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0]

2013-12-24 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
Then you better read how populations or languages become extinct. Hernán 2013/12/24 Esteban Lorenzano > btw that also means that we do not accept code in the form of : simple > packages (without configuration or Issue/SLICE), change sets or code in > mail threads (something that happens a lot

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there any fundamental technical barrier to compiling to JVM byte codes?

2013-12-24 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Andy, On 22 Dec 2013, at 18:38, Andy Burnett wrote: > I am sure it would be a huge amount of work, and may not be a good idea at > all. > > However, given the number of dynamic languages that now compile to JVM > byte codes, I am curious whether there is anything about Pharo that > would make

Re: [Pharo-users] How to contribute [WAS: Re: WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0]

2013-12-24 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
btw that also means that we do not accept code in the form of : simple packages (without configuration or Issue/SLICE), change sets or code in mail threads (something that happens a lot more than it should). On 24 Dec 2013, at 14:06, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Yeah, that part I can understand

[Pharo-users] How to contribute [WAS: Re: WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0]

2013-12-24 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Yeah, that part I can understand it. What I don’t understand is what would be that. Packages part of pharo core are in in Pharo team in smalltalkhub Packages part of pharo extras are un PharoExtras team in smalltalkhub we, as core pharo developers take responsibility over the packages that resid

Re: [Pharo-users] WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0

2013-12-24 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
El 24/12/2013 9:06, Esteban Lorenzano escribió: On 24 Dec 2013, at 12:34, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: I am interested in how to proceed about community packages. I have previously asked and nobody replied: http://forum.world.st/Programmatic-Scoped-Browsing-td4724820.html what is a “comm

Re: [Pharo-users] WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0

2013-12-24 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On 24 Dec 2013, at 12:34, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: > I am interested in how to proceed about community packages. I have previously > asked and nobody replied: > > http://forum.world.st/Programmatic-Scoped-Browsing-td4724820.html what is a “community package”? > > Cheers, > > Hernán >

Re: [Pharo-users] WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0

2013-12-24 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On 24 Dec 2013, at 12:54, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Hello, > > On 24 Dec 2013, at 00:13, vmusulainen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have loaded WebClient from ConfigurationTool on Pharo 2.0. >> It seems something changed at system so I had some issues while loading the >> package and fixed it

Re: [Pharo-users] WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0

2013-12-24 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Hello, On 24 Dec 2013, at 00:13, vmusulainen wrote: > Hi, > > I have loaded WebClient from ConfigurationTool on Pharo 2.0. > It seems something changed at system so I had some issues while loading the > package and fixed it. I would make my fixes public for community. How do > it? > Does ex

Re: [Pharo-users] WebClient Issues on Pharo 2.0

2013-12-24 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
I am interested in how to proceed about community packages. I have previously asked and nobody replied: http://forum.world.st/Programmatic-Scoped-Browsing-td4724820.html Cheers, Hernán El 23/12/2013 20:13, vmusulainen escribió: Hi, I have loaded WebClient from ConfigurationTool on Pharo 2.0