nothing is impossible if you give it either infinite amount of resources or infinite time. I think it would be a great idea, most likely doable with a good team . That would mean probably the redesign of all FFIs but it would gives us the ability to run tons of java libraries out of the box. Would pharo be the same thing ? who cares, same is boring the real fun is to move forward and improve constantly.
Personally I dont care if pharo moves to JVM or not , I only care that it moves forward and seem people excited and having fun with it. Of course I would never sacrifice the very things that make Pharo special like live coding, in favor of popularity. I have said before and I will say it again I have zero issues with pharo not being popular, I tasted popular, boring and annoying as hell. I am here because pharo is special and I want it to remain special, a rebel , a fun way to code, an alternative way of thinking. If I wanted popular I would be coding in Java. On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > Andy, > > On 22 Dec 2013, at 18:38, Andy Burnett <andy.burn...@knowinnovation.com> > wrote: > > > I am sure it would be a huge amount of work, and may not be a good idea > at all. > > > > However, given the number of dynamic languages that now compile to JVM > > byte codes, I am curious whether there is anything about Pharo that > > would make this impossible? > > > > Cheers > > Andy > > This is a complex subject area which touches on many things/issues. I am > not capable of producing a good writeup, but I’ll try to give some kind of > answer. > > It is really hard to define what makes Pharo (or Smalltalk) unique > compared to so many other environments. As you know, it is the special > combination of language, library, IDE and VM that constitutes the real > magic: a live, dynamic, late bound language with meta level capabilities, > including many libraries, frameworks and tools, written in itself. > > Like with Lisp, many/most of the features of Smalltalk can be found here > and there in other languages. Like with Lisp, there are many > implementations of some kind of Lisp/Smalltalk. This has all been done > before. > > Moving Pharo (or Smalltalk) away from its own VM is certainly possible (up > to a point), but the question is: is it still the same thing ? If you can > no longer write your own debugger implemented in the same language ? If you > cannot read code all the way down ? > > Regards, > > Sven > > >
