Re: [HACKERS] pg_rewind and xlogtemp files

2015-06-17 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Vladimir Borodin wrote: >> >> 17 июня 2015 г., в 9:48, Michael Paquier >> написал(а): >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Michael Paquier >> wrote: >> >> As pointed by dev1ant on the original bug report, p

Re: [HACKERS] pg_rewind and xlogtemp files

2015-06-17 Thread Fujii Masao
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Vladimir Borodin wrote: > > 17 июня 2015 г., в 9:48, Michael Paquier > написал(а): > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > As pointed by dev1ant on the original bug report, process_remote_file > should ignore files named as pg_xlog/xlogt

Re: [HACKERS] pg_rewind and xlogtemp files

2015-06-17 Thread Vladimir Borodin
> 17 июня 2015 г., в 9:48, Michael Paquier > написал(а): > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> As pointed by dev1ant on the original bug report, process_remote_file >> should ignore files named as pg_xlog/xlogtemp.*, and I think that this >> is the right thing to do.

Re: [HACKERS] pg_rewind and xlogtemp files

2015-06-16 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > As pointed by dev1ant on the original bug report, process_remote_file > should ignore files named as pg_xlog/xlogtemp.*, and I think that this > is the right thing to do. Any objections for a patch that at the same > time makes "xlogtemp."