> 17 июня 2015 г., в 9:48, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> > написал(а): > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As pointed by dev1ant on the original bug report, process_remote_file >> should ignore files named as pg_xlog/xlogtemp.*, and I think that this >> is the right thing to do. Any objections for a patch that at the same >> time makes "xlogtemp." a define declaration in xlog_internal.h?
Declaration seems to be the right thing. Another problem I’ve caught twice already in the same test: error reading xlog record: record with zero length at 0/78000090 unexpected result while fetching remote files: ERROR: could not open file "base/13003/t6_2424967" for reading: No such file or directory The servers diverged at WAL position 0/76BADD50 on timeline 303. Rewinding from Last common checkpoint at 0/7651F870 on timeline 303 I don’t know if this problem could be solved the same way (by skipping such files)… Should I start a new thread for that? > > And attached is a patch following those lines. > -- > Michael > <20150617_rewind_xlogtemp.patch> > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- May the force be with you… https://simply.name
