Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> I thought this year we were going to start using people's full names
> instead of the first names, for clarity. No?
OK, I will do this once Josh is done with his modifications.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I thought this year we were going to start using people's full names
> instead of the first names, for clarity. No?
+1 for that approach.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to yo
Bruce,
I thought this year we were going to start using people's full names
instead of the first names, for clarity. No?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
There is an additional incompatibilitiy in pg_largeobject catalog.
We need to rewrite queries to test existences of large objests
from SELECT DISTINCT(loid) FR
> Uh, I did adjust the subcategories based on what we completed for 9.0.
> You will find many added/removed ones compared to 8.4
>
>> warranted. Also, within each subcategory, items should be arranged in
>> descending order according to how much impact we expect them to have on
>> users.
>
> I
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> BTW, I didn't say it before, but thanks for getting this draft out
> *now*. It's a lot more time than we've had in the past.
Sure. For some reason it was easier/faster this time; possible causes:
o I am getting better because I have done it before
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Uh, are you saying you want to remove the exiting release note
> > subcategories and put everything into 7-8 long lists? That hardly seems
> > like an improvement, or are you talking about make a user-focused list
> > that is shorter with 7-8 categories?
>
> I'm talking
Bruce,
BTW, I didn't say it before, but thanks for getting this draft out
*now*. It's a lot more time than we've had in the past.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pge
> Uh, are you saying you want to remove the exiting release note
> subcategories and put everything into 7-8 long lists? That hardly seems
> like an improvement, or are you talking about make a user-focused list
> that is shorter with 7-8 categories?
I'm talking about adjusting which subcategori
Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 3/22/10 7:46 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I do not require them to submit SGML; just some format where I can
> > identify the lines that changed. I can do the same for the release
> > notes. I have to check the diffs anyway so manually merging in the
> > changes isn't a p
Joachim Wieland wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Interestingly the 9.0 release notes contain 201 items, while the 8.4
> > release notes contained 314 items.
>
> Is the following pg_dump change covered by the release notes? I
> couldn't find it. It was the last co
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Interestingly the 9.0 release notes contain 201 items, while the 8.4
> release notes contained 314 items.
Is the following pg_dump change covered by the release notes? I
couldn't find it. It was the last committed patch from the 2010-01
comm
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 23:18, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Uh why? Open the file with a text editor, cut and paste the lines
>> elsewhere.
>
> ... because even one edit by anyone else is a merge conflict. And CVS
> isn't too good with merge conflicts. Also few of the people whom I'd
> want to ask f
> Uh why? Open the file with a text editor, cut and paste the lines
> elsewhere.
... because even one edit by anyone else is a merge conflict. And CVS
isn't too good with merge conflicts. Also few of the people whom I'd
want to ask for help are committers -- the release notes are as much
about
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:18:04PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 3/22/10 7:46 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I do not require them to submit SGML; just some format where I
> > can identify the lines that changed. I can do the same for the
> > release notes. I have to check the diffs anyway so man
On mån, 2010-03-22 at 14:18 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So there are 2 large problems I have with the SGML version, let's see if
> we can deal with them separately:
>
> (1) re-arranging and regrouping the items: the stuff in the release
> notes should end up in 7-8 clear categories, with items arr
On 3/22/10 7:46 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I do not require them to submit SGML; just some format where I can
> identify the lines that changed. I can do the same for the release
> notes. I have to check the diffs anyway so manually merging in the
> changes isn't a problem.
So there are 2 large
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> >> In hindsight I could have loaded the ASCII release notes into a wiki and
> >> people could have modified, them, and later I could have converted them
> >> to SGML,
>
> That was, in fact, *exactly* what you said you'd do 3 months ago when we
> discussed this.
I now remem
>> In hindsight I could have loaded the ASCII release notes into a wiki and
>> people could have modified, them, and later I could have converted them
>> to SGML,
That was, in fact, *exactly* what you said you'd do 3 months ago when we
discussed this.
>
> Yeah, I don't think that would have bee
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> bruce wrote:
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> > On 3/19/10 9:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
>> > >
>> > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
>> > >
>> > > I kept the 9.0-alph
bruce wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > On 3/19/10 9:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
> > >
> > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
> > >
> > > I kept the 9.0-alpha release notes in the SGML because people might want
> > > to
Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2010/3/21 Bruce Momjian :
> > Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> >> 2010/3/20 Bruce Momjian :
> >> > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
> >> >
> >> > ? ? ? ?http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
> >> >
> >>
> >> I wonder if we need note a minor compatibi
2010/3/21 Bruce Momjian :
> Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>> 2010/3/20 Bruce Momjian :
>> > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
>> >
>> > ? ? ? ?http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
>> >
>>
>> I wonder if we need note a minor compatibility from extending window
>> function's
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes:
> > I'd favor a beta sooner rather than later even if some stuff is still in
> > flux. This particular release needs as much testing as possible, and
> > 10x as many people will try a beta as an alpha.
>
> Well, the reason they are willing to try a beta is t
2010/3/20 Tom Lane :
> Josh Berkus writes:
>> I'd favor a beta sooner rather than later even if some stuff is still in
>> flux. This particular release needs as much testing as possible, and
>> 10x as many people will try a beta as an alpha.
>
> Well, the reason they are willing to try a beta is
Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 3/19/10 9:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
> >
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
> >
> > I kept the 9.0-alpha release notes in the SGML because people might want
> > to compare them with the rele
Josh Berkus writes:
> I'd favor a beta sooner rather than later even if some stuff is still in
> flux. This particular release needs as much testing as possible, and
> 10x as many people will try a beta as an alpha.
Well, the reason they are willing to try a beta is that it's supposed to
be more
Tom, Bruce,
I'd favor a beta sooner rather than later even if some stuff is still in
flux. This particular release needs as much testing as possible, and
10x as many people will try a beta as an alpha.
--
-- Josh Berkus
Post
On 3/19/10 9:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
>
> I kept the 9.0-alpha release notes in the SGML because people might want
> to compare them with the release notes I did, and because th
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Well, Tom and I have already posted publicly about it. There is nothing
that either us see on the 9.0 "Bugs" open items list that would delay a
beta:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items
I have just been looking at the xmlconcat bug on th
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think we need you and Tom and other senior community members to
>> weigh in a little more overtly on which of the remaining open items
>> should get fixed prior to 9.0beta.
> Well, Tom and I have already posted publicly about it. There is nothing
>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
>
> Interestingly the 9.0 release notes contain 201 items, while the 8.4
> release notes contained 314 items. Of course we will be adding a few
> more 9.0 ite
Robert Haas wrote:
> > Interestingly the 9.0 release notes contain 201 items, while the 8.4
> > release notes contained 314 items. ?Of course we will be adding a few
> > more 9.0 items before 9.0 final, but not a lot. ?The only explanation I
> > can think of is that we were more focused during this
Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2010/3/20 Bruce Momjian :
> > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
> >
> > ? ? ? ?http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
> >
>
> I wonder if we need note a minor compatibility from extending window
> function's frame.
>
> - Change BETWEEN from
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
>
> I kept the 9.0-alpha release notes in the SGML because people might want
> to compare them with the release notes I did,
2010/3/20 Bruce Momjian :
> I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
>
I wonder if we need note a minor compatibility from extending window
function's frame.
- Change BETWEEN from TYPE_FUNC_NAME_KEYWORD from COL_NAME_KEYWO
36 matches
Mail list logo
