Hitoshi Harada wrote: > 2010/3/20 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us>: > > I have completed the 9.0 release notes: > > > > ? ? ? ?http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html > > > > I wonder if we need note a minor compatibility from extending window > function's frame. > > - Change BETWEEN from TYPE_FUNC_NAME_KEYWORD from COL_NAME_KEYWORD
I see. The change appears to be from "can be function or type name" to "cannot be function or type name", according to misc.c::pg_get_keywords(). What error will they see if they do use an invalid name? Will it be clear that they just need to rename it? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
